Êóðñîâàÿ ðàáîòà: Private sector and human-resource development in Georgia
Êóðñîâàÿ ðàáîòà: Private sector and human-resource development in Georgia
TBILISI, GEORGIA
Private
Sector and Human-resource Development in Georgia
Author: Lasha Martashvili
E-mail: lmg@bk.ru
(18.02.2004)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Government Policies. 5
1.1 Government promotion policies of small
and medium size enterprises. 5
1.2 National Investment
Agency of Georgia.. 5
1.3 Georgian Investment
Center. 5
1.2.1 Government’s Export Promotion Policy. 6
1.2.2 Georgian Export Promotion Agency (GEPA) 9
1.4 Foreign Investment
Promotion.. 14
1.3.1 Government’s Foreign Investment Promotion Policy. 14
1.3.2 Foreign Investment Advisory Council (FIAC) 21
1.5 Tax Regime. 23
1.3.3 Taxation System and Tax Rates in Georgia. 23
1.3.4 Existing Taxation Practices. 34
1.3.5 Tax Reform Areas. 38
1.6 Legislative Basis for
the Operation of the Private Companies. 44
1.5.1 Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs (LoE) (Corporate Law) 44
1.5.2 Law of Georgia on Securities Market (SML) 51
1.5.3 Employment Regulations in Georgia. 57
1.5.4 Regulations about Real Estate in Georgia. 59
1.7 The Business
Environment in Georgia.. 61
1.8 Institutional
Arrangements. 64
1.3.1 Securities Industry. 64
2. Society.. 65
2.1 Poverty issues. 65
3. Economics. 70
3.1 Main economic indicators. 70
3.2 Agriculture. 77
3.3 Trade. 104
3.4 Construction.. 106
4. Business. 110
4.1 Company Registration and Licensing
System.. 110
4.1.1 Company Registration System.. 110
4.1.2 Company Licensing System.. 117
4.2 Local Enterprises. 119
4.1.3 Joint Stock Companies traded at Georgian Stock Exchange. 120
4.1.4 Joint Stock Companies not traded at Georgian Stock Exchange. 132
4.3 Human-Resource Development in the Private Sector. 134
5. Other Donors’
Activities. 138
5.1 The World Bank and IMF. 138
5.1.1 List of the Active World Bank Projects in Georgia. 138
S – Satisfactory. 138
U - Unsatisfactory. 138
5.1.2 List of the Closed World Bank Projects in Georgia. 139
5.1.3 Description of the Closed World Bank Projects in Georgia. 140
5.1.4 The World Bank and IMF
Cooperation in Georgia. 149
5.1.5 The World Bank Country Assistance
Strategy for Georgia. 154
5.1.6 The World Bank Partners in
Georgia. 161
5.2 USAID.. 162
5.3 EBRD.. 162
5.4 EU.. 162
5.5 GTZ.. 163
5.6 CIDA.. 163
5.7 DFID.. 163
5.8 The Government of the Netherlands. 163
5.9 IFAD.. 164
5.10 UNDP. 164
5.11 UNICEF. 164
Currency
(Exchange rate as of 01 Feb. 2004)
Currency Unit = Georgian Lari (GEL) |
1 USD = 2.11 GEL
1.0 GEL = 0.47 USD
|
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
|
CAS
|
Country Assistance
Strategy of the World Bank |
CFAA
|
Country Financial
Accountability Assessment |
CIS
|
Commonwealth of
Independent States |
CPIA
|
Country Policy and
Institutional Assessment |
DFID
|
Department for
International Development, U.K. |
EBRD
|
European Bank for
Reconstruction & Development |
EDPRP
|
Economic Dev’t
& Poverty Reduction Program |
EU
|
European Union |
FAO
|
Food and
Agriculture Organization |
FDI
|
Foreign Direct
Investment |
FIAS
|
Foreign Investment
Advisory Service |
FSAP
|
Financial Sector
Assessment Program |
FSU
|
Former Soviet Union |
FY
|
Fiscal Year |
GDP
|
Gross Domestic
Product |
GEL
|
Georgian Lari |
GNP
|
Gross National
Product |
GoG
|
Government of
Georgia |
GSE
|
Georgian Stock
Exchange |
GTZ
|
German Technical
Cooperation |
IDA
|
International
Development Association |
IDF
|
Institutional
Development Fund |
IDP
|
Internally
Displaced Persons |
IFC
|
International
Finance Corporation |
IMF
|
International
Monetary Fund |
IOSCO
|
The International
Organization of Securities Commissions |
JSC
|
Joint Stock Company |
KfW
|
German Financial
Cooperation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLC
|
Limited Liability Company |
MDGs
|
Millennium Development Goals |
MoF
|
Ministry of Finance |
NBG
|
National Bank of
Georgia |
NGO
|
Non-Governmental
Organization |
NBG
|
National Bank of
Georgia |
NGO
|
Non-Governmental
Organization |
OECD
|
Organization For
Economic Coop’n & Development |
PER
|
Public Expenditure
Review |
PPP
|
Purchasing Power
Parity |
PRGF
|
Poverty Reduction
and Growth Facility |
PRSP
|
Poverty Reduction
Strategy Paper |
SAC
|
Structural
Adjustment Credit |
SATAC
|
Structural
Adjustment Technical Assistance Credit |
SEC
|
Security and
Exchange Commission |
SIDA
|
Swedish
International Development Agency |
SIF
|
Social Investment
Fund |
SME
|
Small and Medium
Enterprises |
SRS
|
Structural Reform
Support Project |
TACIS
|
Technical
Assistance to the CIS (EU) |
UNDP
|
United Nations
Development Program |
UNHCR
|
United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees |
USAID
|
United States Agency for
International Development |
VAT
|
Value Added Tax |
WTO
|
World Trade
Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Government Policies
[To be described:] "Small and
Medium Enterprise State Support Program for 2002 - 2004 in Georgia"
[To be described:] Law of Georgia "On Promotion of Small and Medium Enterprises"
[To be described:] Law of Georgia "On National Investment Agency of Georgia"
[To be described:] Activities of the
National Investment Agency of Georgia
[To be described:] Activities of the
Georgian Investment Centre
Foreign Trade Regimes. Reforms carried out in recent years in Georgia, including serious
legal reforms, are working successfully to create a favourable foreign trade
regime in the country. Since 1995 the following major reforms have taken place
in Georgian legislation:
- The system of
quotas has been eliminated.
- Products
included in the nation's export embargo policy include only works of art
and antiques and items of national historical importance.
- There is no
customs duty for exports in Georgia.
- A fiscal
policy aimed at stimulating exports has been introduced whereby all export
goods are free of VAT and excise duty;
Export of goods requiring an export
license have been reduced to the following classes:
Collections and collectors' pieces of
zoological, botanical, mineral, anatomical, historical, archaeological,
paleonthological, ethnographic or numismatic interest (HS - 9705);
Wood and timber (4401, 4403, 4404, 4406, 4407);
Seeds of Caucasus Pine (120999100);
Ferrous and non-ferrous metal scrap (7204, 7404, 7602).
The system of compulsory registration of foreign trade contracts was eliminated in November
1997.
The establishment of favourable trade
regimes with partner countries through bilateral and multilateral agreements
has commenced. During the period 1992 - 1998, Georgia signed trade agreements
with 22 countries. Agreements on free trade have been signed with eight CIS
countries and Georgia already has working free trade agreements with Russia,
Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. Currently a multilateral
agreement on CIS free trade zone is being enforced. According to these
agreements signatories to the agreement need not use customs duties and taxes
for exports or imports of the goods originated in the territory of one party
and destined to the territory of the other party.
Furthermore, Georgia has become a part of several international conventions.
On October 6, 1999 Georgia became a member of the World Trade Organization
(WTO) which granted Georgia the status of the Most Favoured Nation with 135 WTO
member countries. Through the mechanisms of this organisation, Georgia will be
protected from discrimination, unfair competition, falsification and
unjustified limitations.
In 1996 Georgia signed an agreement on partnership and cooperation with the
European Union which deals with economic relations in almost every sector. In
fact the agreement covers all sectors of the economy.
In 1999 Georgia became a member of the Council of Europe with full rights,
which will further facilitate trade-economic relations between Georgia and
member countries of the European Union.
Many countries have granted to Georgia reductions in import customs taxes to
their countries, under the General System of Preferences. These include the
countries of the European Union, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia,
Canada and Japan. This is one of the most important influences on the
successful growth of exports for Georgia. The effective use of facilities such
as GSP will substantially promote Georgian export development.
Law of Georgia "On
Technical Barriers to Trade". The law "On Technical Barriers to Trade" lays down the
basis for eliminating the technical barriers to trade during the process of the
preparation, adoption and application of the technical regulations, standards
and the procedures for the assessment of conformity.
The national technical regulations and
standards should not create unnecessary obstacles to trade, which will put
national products in favourable conditions. Therefore, the development of the
national technical regulations and standards should be carried out on the basis
of a direct use of the international standards.
Georgian legislation did not envisage
the concept of technical regulations. The concept of technical regulations was
defined by Law of Georgia "On Standardization" adopted in 1999. The
technical regulations is a legal act, which defines the technical
specifications for products or service, which is done directly or by means of
referring to Georgian standards and requiring that complying with these
standards is compulsory.
The principles of the state standards
that are effective in Georgia envisage the application of the national
standards on a compulsory basis from the moments of its effectiveness. However,
based on the principles that define the standards as voluntary, the
international practice envisages two-stage approach to making a standard as
mandatory requirement: the standard that was adopted by national body is
optional and it may be used by any party, however it will become mandatory, if
it is defined by:
The legislation;
Such stipulation is indicated in the
technical regulations;
A producer or supplier of services
assumed such responsibility by the assessment of conformity.
The first chapter of the present draft law lays down the legal basis for eliminating
the technical barriers to trade during the process of the preparation, adoption
and application of the technical regulations, standards and the procedures for
the assessment of conformity.
It defines the terms, including
"Technical barriers to trade", which in fact is the discrepancy in
requirements from those used at a national level or in international practice
with respect to the technical regulations, standards and the procedures for the
assessment of conformity.
It defines the different categories of
technical regulations, which include:
Legislative acts, the decrees of the
President of Georgia, which consist of the product requirements;
The national standards, the
application of which is mandatory;
The agency specific normative acts
issued by government bodies, the competency of which, according to the
legislation of Georgia, includes laying down the mandatory product
requirements.
The second chapter defines the requirements to the content of technical regulations,
preparation of technical regulations and procedures for the assessment of
conformity, coordination of the activities related to
the development of technical regulations, and recognizing the technical
regulations of foreign countries as an equivalent to the national technical
regulations.
Chapter three defines the procedure of applying technical regulations and
standards, which includes making references to standards in technical
regulations, fulfillment of standards as a mandatory requirement, fulfillment
of standards as a voluntary requirement, and the national arrangements for
applying the technical regulations and standards with respect to the national
and imported products.
Chapter four defines the principles of providing information relating to
technical barriers to trade. The main emphasis is placed on the Central
Information Center of Standards, the main function of which is the relationship
with the World Trade Organization. The Central Information Center of Standards
provides information about the technical regulations, standards and the
procedures for the assessment of conformity that are already developed or are
in the process of development. It should carry out the coordination of
activities of the centers set up in this field by other government bodies.
Chapter five defines the authority and responsibility of the National
Standardizing Body and other government bodies.
Chapter six lays down the principles of the state control and supervision on
complying with the requirements of technical regulations, as well as the
responsibility for violating the requirements of the law.
Chapter seven states that the process of developing technical regulations has to
be financed by the state on a mandatory basis.
Chapter eight contains the provisional clauses, which states that the government
bodies should adopt and publish those technical regulations, which envisage
complying on a mandatory basis with the standards that ensure the quality of
products, processes and service, security, protection of human life, protection
of the health, property and environment. With this respect it will be
significant to employ, whenever developing the technical regulations, the
directives issued by the countries that are members of the European Union.
Chapter nine defines the amendments that have to be made into Georgian
legislation after this law becomes effective.
The Law of Georgia "On Technical
Barriers to Trade" should initiate the practical efforts towards the
preparation, adoption and application of the technical regulations, which will
be step forward towards setting up voluntary standardization system that is one
of the attributes of modern market relationships.
The Georgian Export Promotion Agency
was set up by the Georgian Government and the European Union's Technical
Assistance Programme TACIS with the principal aim of assisting Georgian
companies to increase exports and thus to stimulate an improvement in the
country's trade balance. The GEPA was established in April 1999. Since then,
the German Government's Technical Assistance Programme GTZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH) has
also invested in the agency both in its personnel and in its activities.
GEPA supports Georgian business
interests in the global marketplace, assists in forging business alliances,
facilitates establishment of international business relationships. GEPA
provides comprehensive information on business opportunities both for Georgian
and overseas companies.
Export Information Center. GEPA Export Information Centre (EIC) promotes Georgian companies
and their products on the global marketplace. It offers the services of two
Georgian business information officers and a librarian who work in cooperation
with specialists from EU countries. The EIC holds a wide range trade
information resources including reference materials, manuals and textbooks on
exporting, sector related journals from overseas, CD-ROM and online databases,
information on local and foreign markets, trade regulations and has wide access
to trade leads databases.
The EIC services include but are not limited to:
Providing market information to
Georgian exporters
Introducing Georgia and Georgian
products to companies around the world
Assisting foreign companies in
sourcing products in Georgia
Offering online trade leads both for
Georgian exporters and overseas importers
Assisting Georgian companies in
developing an export marketing strategy
Overseas Exhibitions and Trade
Missions. GEPA is actively involved in
preparing overseas business visits for Georgian business groups to meet with
new trading partners; we also prepare and part finance Georgian sectors'
participation at international exhibitions. Many foreign delegations,
commercial and governmental, pay a visit to our agency during their visits to
Tbilisi. Study tours for sectors with potential have been organized to Canada,
UK and Germany.
With financial assistance from the German government's technical assistance
programme, GTZ, GEPA part-finance participation of Georgian exporters in
overseas trade shows/exhibitions. GEPA/GTZ have already assisted companies to
take part in exhibitions in Germany, France, Italy and the Middle East.
Conditions for participation are that export products must be of export
quality, prices examined by German specialists and a group of a minimum of
three producers from one sector participates in each exhibition.
Training Center. GEPA offers a wide range of export training courses to Georgian
businessmen, civil servants, and commercial banks, on subjects ranging from
export pricing to utilizing e-commerce in exporting. All courses are taught by
international and Georgian specialists in their given fields of specialization.
A new Training Programme that Georgian
Export Promotion Agency offers to Georgian companies differs considerably from
the Programme already conducted by GEPA within the framework of previous TACIS
project. It includes an In-Company Training that is designed to meet the
training needs of companies participating in GEPA's Export Development Program.
Customized programs have been developed for specific companies to increase the
professional skills of company managers and staff and thereby help them improve
their export activities. In-company training is considered as part of the
consultancy service provided by GEPA to existing exporters and to companies
with the potential to export. Format and content of training depends on
business features of individual companies. Mostly practical exercises and case
studies have been used to achieve the best results.
Alongside in-company training, GEPA continues to offer general training in
Export Marketing, Export Promotion, Strategic Business Planning etc.
GEPA hopes that new arrangements run in the field of training, will be of real
assistance to Georgian companies in enhancing their export marketing activities
and in achieving increased export orders.
Publications. GEPA staff prepares a variety of publications for both Georgian
exporters and overseas companies. These publications include Export Newsletter,
Market Briefs, Fact Sheets and the Directory of Georgian Exporters. Recently a
brochure on Georgian viticulture and winemaking was prepared in corporation
with the Institute of Viticulture.
Export Newsletter. Export Newsletter is available both in print and electronic
formats on our website. It is circulated to Georgian companies and
international organizations. It includes information on opportunities outside
Georgia for exporters, case studies on successful Georgian and foreign
companies and an update on any changes in Georgian, and foreign legislation,
which may affect exporters. It also advises of forthcoming exhibitions and
incoming buying missions from overseas.
Market Briefs. Market Briefs are prepared in Georgian and are available for
Georgian companies interested in specific industries and markets. Market briefs
prepared to date are as follows:
1.
UK Wine Market
2.
Pipes' Market in Italy
3.
Organic Food market in Germany
4.
UK Nuts Market
5.
Timber Market in Germany
6.
UK Tea market
7.
Intellectual Property - overview
8.
EU Fertilizer Market
9.
USA and EU Markets for Essential Oils
10. Wine Market in Japan
11. Mineral Waters in Japan
Sample Market Brief: Wine
Market in Japan
Wine Market in Japan
|
1. |
Market Overview |
1.1 |
Market conditions |
1.2 |
Trends in local production |
1.3 |
Wine imports |
1.4 |
Consumption trends |
2. |
Import regulations |
2.1 |
Import restrictions and application procedures |
2.2 |
Labelling requirements |
2.3 |
Tariff rates |
3. |
Distribution Channels |
4. |
Consumption trends |
4.1 |
Prices |
4.2 |
Wine categories |
4.3 |
Japanese consumption traditions |
5. |
Market Entry |
5.1 |
Entering Japanese market |
5.2 |
Wine sales promotion strategies |
6. |
Annexes |
|
Sample Market Briefs: Mineral
Waters in Japan
Mineral Waters in Japan
|
1. |
Market Overview |
1.1 |
Supply Trend |
1.2 |
Import Trend |
2. |
Import System and Regulations |
2.1 |
Imports Regulated by Food Sanitation Law |
2.2 |
Tariff rates |
2.3 |
Classification of Mineral Water |
2.4 |
Labelling requirement and a labelling sample |
2.5 |
Outline of Container/Packing Recycling Law |
2.6 |
International Standards for Mineral Waters |
3. |
Distribution |
3.1 |
Distribution Routes |
3.2 |
The Function of Wholesalers |
3.3 |
Distribution Expenses |
3.4 |
Sales Promotions |
4. |
Consumption trends as shown by survey of retailers
and consumers |
4.1 |
Consumption trends seen in retailers |
4.2 |
Trends revealed by consumer research |
5. |
Current Sales and consumption and future prospects |
5.1 |
Current sales and consumption |
5.2 |
Future prospects |
6. |
Advise on Accessing the Japanese Market |
Appendix
|
1 |
Outline of provisions on mineral water provided for
under the Foods Sanitation Law |
2 |
Example Retail Price of Mineral Water |
3 |
Selected domestic Suppliers and Importers |
4 |
Wholesalers, Distribution Agents |
5 |
Relevant Organization |
6 |
Exhibitions and Trade Fair |
|
Removing Administrative Barriers
to Investment in Georgia. FIAS (Foreign Investment Advisory Service, a joint service of the
International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the World Bank) conducted a study
of administrative barriers to investment in Georgia. The principal counterpart
for this project was the Presidential Commission on Support of the Private
Businesses in Georgia. The Presidential Commission on Support of Private
Businesses is the lead counterpart for this project (for more details refer to
Paragraph 1.3.1 describing the activities of Foreign
Investment Advisory Council - FIAC). The
main objective of this study was to identify the major administrative
impediments to investment and to
recommend the steps for streamlining, simplifying and increasing transparency
in order to help improve the environment for business in Georgia. Although the
primary focus of the study was foreign investment, the administrative
procedures and regulatory framework affect domestic investors as well.
Therefore, applying the principle of national treatment (i.e. no preferential treatment
for foreign investors), this study is intended to help strengthen the business
environment for all investors—domestic and foreign alike.
The study covers the core
administrative processes for:
·
Establishing a
business - including investor entry (visa and residency requirements for
expatriates) and business registration.
·
Locating a
business - including land acquisition, site development, construction and
operation.
·
Operating a
business - including taxation, trade regime and customs, licensing, permits,
inspections, intellectual property issues, and product standardization.
Establishing a Business—Investor
Entry and Business Registration. The procedures
for obtaining entry visas are relatively transparent and present no significant
administrative impediments. Most notably, foreign investors and expatriate
employees do not require special work or residence permits to live and work in
Georgia.
The court registration procedures have
been simplified in the past 2 years. However, because of the lack of technical
and human capacity, court registrars are unable to fulfill the provisions of
the Law on Entrepreneurs aimed at guaranteeing timely service, ensuring public
availability of information on companies, publishing data on newly registered
companies, and protecting company names. The most pressing issues relate to
length of time required to register (2 to 3 weeks) and to retrieve information
on companies.
The
principal recommendations for improving the business registration process and
the access to company records include:
·
Modernization of the registration and data filing systems by taking advantage of
new technologies (including the internet) to speed up processing and to improve
the access to information, as provided under the law.
·
Centralization of
the court registration system.
·
Publication and dissemination of information on business registration
procedures, requirements and fees.
·
Resolution of the legal provisions for
information disclosure under the Law on Entrepreneurs and the Tax Code.
Locating a Business. Locating,
acquiring and constructing or rehabilitating real estate for business
activities are not perceived as significant problems by either foreign or
domestic investors in Georgia. The current system may not pose an overwhelming
difficulty for investors because of the low volume of transactions and the
institutionalized system of unofficial payments and influence peddling to
facilitate the process. However, there are a number of specific areas where
regulations, requirements, and procedures need to be clarified, simplified and
streamlined. The report includes a number of detailed short and long-term
recommendations for strengthening the laws related to the privatization of
agricultural land and improving the quality of service provided by the various
bureaus responsible for processing the permits necessary for property
development and construction in Georgia.
One of the principal recommendations relates to the Law On
Privatization of Agricultural Land. The set of laws on privatization of
real estate exclude a legal basis for privatization of large agricultural
holdings, all of which are presently held under government leases. To the
extent that investment in commercial scale agriculture is viewed as having
significant potential in Georgia, privatization of larger agricultural holdings
is an appropriate next step. A law on privatization of large agricultural
holdings is being developed and is an element of the government’s longer-term
plan for further development of property relationships.[1]
Enactment of this law should be a priority.
Operating a Business - Tax Administration. On the basis of interviews with representatives of the private
sector, government officials, and technical assistance experts, it appears that
the tax administration system is fraught with problems that seriously constrain
the activities of private enterprises. The recurring themes voiced by the
private sector as being burdensome for business included the complexity of the
tax system, the lack of clarity in some aspects of the Tax Code and the sheer
number of taxes itself. Foreign-owned enterprises seem to be particularly
affected under the existing system. In keeping with the scope of this study,
the discussion is focused on taxation administration. Recommendations on tax
policy are confined to those issues that directly affect administrative
procedures and impede business activity. It should be noted that the
International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and USAID are currently providing
assistance to the Government of Georgia on taxation policy issues.
The main
recommendations include the following (for more detailed discussion of tax
issues please refer to the next paragraph - "1.4 Tax Regime"):
·
Adopt and implement the proposed amendments
to the Tax Code. These proposed amendments cover a
number of policy and tax administration issues. They are broadly in line with
IMF recommendations, except the
Government proposal for the fixed tax and the elimination of the payroll tax.
·
Simplify the procedures for filing VAT. The proposed measures include allowing quarterly, rather than
monthly filings for small
businesses.
·
Establish an effective tax-refund system. The International Monetary Fund has outlined a refund strategy
that includes limiting entitlement to immediate refunds, distinguishing
claimants with a history of compliance, and using pre-refund audits for
high-risk refund claims and post-refund audits for claims of lesser risk.
·
Review the micro level target-based system
for tax collection. It is important to distinguish
between the fiscal macro targets which are an important aspect of revenue
administration and micro or firm-level targets which are often arbitrarily
established within tax jurisdictions. These targets must be realistic and they should
be part of a number of efficiency and effectiveness indicators.
·
Improve information compilation and
dissemination. Taxpayers must be informed of
changes in the Tax Code and related regulations, legal interpretations, and
instructions in a timely manner. Also, a credible resource must be established
to respond to queries offer binding interpretations of the Tax Code.
Operating a Business – Customs. The
State Customs Department (SCD) operates an inland clearance system that
requires considerable resources and logistical support for effective control of
cargo. In practice, the current system is largely ineffective and prone to
fraud and corruption. There is no compendium of the legislation on customs
available to the customs service employees or the public. In the absence of
common information and an official interpretation of the rules and regulations,
the discretionary authority of individual customs officers and offices is
strong thereby facilitating corruption. There is significant leakage of cargo
transported for inland clearance. Some sources estimate that as much as 50
percent of fuel and cigarette imports are diverted.
Management of the SCD has suffered as a result of frequent changes
in the management. Efforts to reform the SCD have been impeded by the lack of
political will, competing political agendas, and the frequent changes in
leadership. Under these circumstances, the inputs of external advisers have
been marginalized and the reforms implemented by previous chairmen have been
reversed in many instances. The detailed action plan prepared under the ITS
contract and endorsed by the government has been stalled with only marginal
progress. The customs reform committee established by the President to lead the
reform effort has met irregularly.
The
principal recommendations for strengthening and improving the customs service
include:
·
Implementation of the already approved customs
reform program. This is a well developed and comprehensive program that can be
implemented over time. It encompasses a number of the IMF and FIAS
recommendations. One of the immediate tasks would be to assign priorities for
implementation.
·
In light of the decision not to renew the ITS
contract, it is necessary to immediately develop and implement a framework for
carrying out efficient pre-shipment inspection services if it is to be
continued after December 30, 2001. The SCD clearly lacks the capacity or the
expertise to carry out this function independently.
·
Review of the existing regulations for the
valuation of cargo and implementation of guidelines that are consistent with
the provisions of GATT.
·
Revision of the declaration processing
procedures to eliminate contact between the import (or broker or freight
forwarder) and the customs officer.
·
Expansion of the ASYCUDA system to all major
customs clearance offices.
·
Implementation of risk-based criteria for
selecting goods and documents to be examined at all locations where imported
goods are cleared.
·
Implementation of an information publication and
dissemination program.
Operating a Business - Licensing and Permits. The existing regime for licenses has benefited from extensive
efforts to streamline and simplify the legal framework for licenses. As a
result, the current licensing procedures do not appear to present significant
barriers to investment and business activity in Georgia, particularly compared
with other former Soviet Union countries. However, some of the sectoral
licensing laws and regulations do not conform to the provisions of the
framework Law on Licensing.
The Law on Local Charges and related normative acts (including
municipal regulations) are not entirely clear in defining the purpose and scope
of permits. The criteria and conditions for authorizing and terminating permits
(similar to licensing conditions) are not clearly specified in the laws and
regulations. In effect, the enforcement of the permit system is arbitrary and
subject to abuse of the compliance provisions and the assessment of violations.
While this permit regime does not generally impede business in Georgia, it does
create unequal conditions for newcomers and arbitrary enforcement can cause
significant problems for individual companies.
The main
recommendations for strengthening the framework for the system of licensing and
permits and facilitating the streamlining and simplification of the current
system in Georgia include:
·
Passage and adoption of a strong and clear
framework law and implementing regulations on the licensing and permit regimes.
·
Review and rationalization of the number and
level of legally permissible permits to avoid the proliferation of permits for
revenue generation.
·
Development of a basic set of guidelines on the
procedures for processing and enforcing permits (similar to those in place for
licenses).
·
Development of a monitoring mechanism within the
Ministry of Justice that will ensure consistent enforcement of provisions for
permits.
·
Publication and dissemination of information on
the legally sanctioned licenses and permits (e.g., regulations, procedures,
documentation requirements, fees and appeals mechanisms).
Operating a Business - Inspections.
The passage of the Law on Supervising Entrepreneurial Activity represented the
most recent of a series of attempts to streamline the business inspection
process by state and local governments. It is, however, too early to assess the
effect of this new law. At the time of the FIAS mission, the implementing
regulations had not been completed and the law had not been fully implemented.
The main
recommendations to strengthen the implementation of the new regime for
inspections include:
·
Articulate and publish the mandate of each
inspectorate as well as information on definitions of violations, criteria for
selecting businesses for inspection, the penalties that may be assessed under
specific conditions, and the rights and responsibilities of inspectors and
businesses.
·
Halt extralegal inspectorate activity pending
the registration of all sanctioned inspection activities.
·
Establish and enforce procedures for conducting
on-site inspections.
·
Regulate the payment of penalties and fines
resulting from inspections to a central cashier in order to avoid on-site
payments and minimize opportunities for corruption.
·
Coordinate and rationalize the activities of
inspection agencies; implement initiatives for joint training and information
sharing among inspection agencies; introduce a code of conduct for inspectors;
and train inspectors to understand that their primary function is to ensure
public health and safety.
Conclusions and Next Steps. There
is a general agreement within Georgia that the existing environment for
investment needs to improve if the country wishes to attract new FDI flows and
secure the expansion of existing investments. This report has focused on the
principal administrative barriers that increase the cost and risk of doing
business in Georgia.
Pervasive corruption and the apparent lack of political will to
implement reforms have emerged as two fundamental issues affecting the business
environment in Georgia. While the degree of corruption may not be the worst in
the region, it has a negative effect on business activity and increases the
risks and costs of doing business in Georgia. The process of streamlining and
simplifying administrative procedures must go hand-in-hand with anti-corruption
programs. In a similar vein, it should be noted that number of reforms (e.g.
Customs reform) have been stalled as a result of resistance to change and the
apparent lack of political will effect change.
In addition to making recommendations for solving some of the
regulatory, administrative, and institutional issues that need to be addressed
in order to improve the business environment in Georgia, the report points out
the areas where further review is necessary and where significant technical
assistance is already being channeled, albeit with limited impact.
The experience of other countries clearly demonstrates that
sustainable change cannot be achieved without government commitment at the
highest political levels. Successful and sustained change requires leadership,
strong champions, and shared goals among all stakeholders within the government
and the private sector. On the basis of shared goals, the process of
rationalizing, streamlining, and simplifying bureaucratic procedures can
develop, gain momentum, and improve the values of government agencies and
transform them into service-oriented organizations. A comprehensive approach to
change is necessary, and commitment and time are essential ingredients.
Procedural and institutional reforms will require the support of public
servants at all levels of government, plus their support for changes in the
systems of performance monitoring, evaluation, and rewards.
The Presidential Commission on Support of Private Business already
exists as a champion of this initiative. However, the framework for the change
agenda must include the participation and inputs of stakeholders at all levels.
Stakeholders must be drawn from the public and private sectors. In addition,
there is a role for the international donor community in this framework since
the incorporation of related donor-sponsored initiatives must be integrated
into the change agenda. Chapter V of the report proposes a framework for the
development and implementation of the change agenda.
The institutional structure to support the change agenda should include:
·
The Presidential Commission. The
Commission should serve as the focal point of the change agenda and it should
be given the mandate to promote and advocate reforms in collaboration with
other parts of the Government.
·
An implementation team. The staff of the
commission’s secretariat should constitute the core group of the implementation
team. The responsibilities of the team would include the development of the
Action Plan, coordination of implementation activities, solicitation of donor
funds and resources to support reform, coordination of related initiatives, and
regular reporting on progress to the Commission.
·
A consultative committee. The committee
should provide a mechanism for regular consultation with a broad group of
stakeholders on various reform initiatives.
The above - mentioned Action Plan should be utilized to document the
agreed-upon changes, establish priorities and timeline, provide a basis for
accountability, and keep an ongoing record of progress. Therefore, it must be
emphasized that the Action Plan is not a static document but one that must
evolve over time.
Law of Georgia "On
Investment Activity Promotion and Guarantees". On 12 November 1996 the Parliament of Georgia adopted the law of
Georgia "On Investment Activity Promotion and Guarantees", which
replaced the Law of the Republic of Georgia "On Investment Activity"
adopted on 10 August 1991 and the Law of the Republic of Georgia "On
Foreign Investments" adopted on 30 June 1995.
The Law defines the legal bases for realizing
both foreign and local investments and their protection guarantees on the
territory of Georgia. The purpose of the Law is to establish the
investment-promotional regime in Georgia.
Investments. Investments shall be deemed to be all types of property and
intellectual valuables or rights invested and applied for gaining possible
profit in the investment activity carried out in the territory of Georgia, such
as:
a)
Monetary assets, a share, stocks and other
securities;
b)
Movable and immovable property (real estate) -
land, buildings, structures, equipment and other material valuables;
c)
Lease rights to land and the use of natural
resources (including concession), patents, licenses, know-how, experience and
other intellectual valuables;
d)
Other property or intellectual valuables or
rights provided for by the law.
Investor. An investor shall be deemed to be a physical (individual) or legal
person, as well as an international organization investing in Georgia. A
foreign investor shall be deemed to be:
a)
A foreign citizen;
b)
A stateless person temporarily residing on the
territory of Georgia;
c)
A Georgian citizen permanently residing abroad;
d)
A legal person registered beyond Georgia.
An enterprise with a foreign investment of not less than 25%
shall enjoy the same rights as the foreign investor.
In order to assist foreign investment
inflow into Georgia, improve investment climate in the country and support
private sector development, it became necessary to create a special government
agency, which would serve the above-mentioned goals. Therefore, on March 30,
1997, according to the presidential decree N87, Foreign Investment Advisory
Council (FIAC) was created under the supervision of the President of Georgia,
intended to assist the development of the private sector and improve the
investment environment in the country, to coordinate donors and donor financed
projects, to monitor these projects and to ensure a transparency and accounting
of foreign aid inflow into Georgia.
The Investment Council operates through its secretariat, which is responsible
for the fulfilment of the responsibilities assigned to the Foreign Investment
Advisory Council. The Secretariat of the Investment Council works in three
directions:
Prepares the Council's meetings;
Cooperates with the donors and
coordinates the donor financed projects;
Assists the private sector.
Preparation of the council's meetings. The secretariat of the
council plans, prepares meeting and monitors their procession. The meetings are
preceded by a preparatory phase, during which the Secretariat identifies
priority issues, gathers relevant information, processes, analysis it and identifies
a range of possible conclusions. One of the responsibilities of the Secretariat
is to control the fulfilment of assigned works and appraise their compliance
and produce relevant recommendations.
Cooperation with the donors and
coordination of the donor financed projects.
Activities related to the cooperation with donors and coordination of the
donor-financed projects are a part of the Secretariat's daily job. The
Secretariat of FIAC conducts permanent monitoring and control of the projects.
Among the donor related activities, a notable obligation of the FIAC
Secretariat is to identify the strategy of cooperation with the donors and
direct flow of further assistance to relevant channels and to target further
projects. Daily work of the FIAC Secretariat includes collection of information
on problems related with investment projects and identification of ways of
their solution. The council cooperates with short term missions of donors,
organizes meetings, drafts agendas and prepares background information for
topics of discussion for the Government members as well as for the President of
Georgia. The FIAC Secretariat actively works on elaboration of
financial-economic, and particularly international relations related
legislation of Georgia.
Private sector related activities. To fulfil this obligation the
council works in few directions. According to the presidential decree N1324, a
Presidential Commission on Support of the Private Businesses in Georgia was
formed in the year 2000. By means of close cooperation of the Commission and
FIAS, it became possible to study all administrative barriers to investment
(see above). As a result, the problems impeding the development of business in
Georgia were identified. On the basis of the results of this study, the recommendations
were drafted and action plan was compiled, which was approved by the president
of Georgia. The commission of cooperation with investors conducts permanent
monitoring of fulfilment of the action plan, appraises its fulfilment and
prepares relevant recommendations. The Secretariat of Foreign Investment
Advisory Council actively cooperates with other donor organizations in terms of
the private sector development projects.
Legal Framework. The Tax Code of Georgia,
adopted on June 13, 1997,[2] is the principal law on taxation policy and administration. Other
legislation that regulate taxation include the Administrative Offences Code, the
Criminal Code, bankruptcy legislation, customs legislation, the Law on the Road
Fund of Georgia, and the Law on the Medical Insurance Fund of Georgia.
The taxation system in Georgia
includes both national and local taxes; the latter are set by local authorities
following guidelines and limits set forth in the Tax Code. Every taxpayer must
register with their regional tax inspectorate and is given a tax identification
number, which must be indicated on all tax documents.
Taxes Paid by Individuals, Individual
Enterprises.
Income Tax. Income tax must be paid on wages and income earned from economic
activity, including income received in non-monetary form. Physical persons,
both resident and non-resident, individual enterprises, and entrepreneurs are
subject to this tax. Under Georgian law, residents are physical persons in the
territory of Georgia for more than 182 days during any 12-month period ending
in a given tax year.
An individual enterprise is defined as
an entity owned and managed by a single person, an enterprise run solely by
family members, or a farm solely owned by an individual or members of that
individual’s family. Physical person entrepreneurs are individuals who engage
in entrepreneurial activity without first establishing themselves as legal
persons (and in accordance with the entrepreneurs law). Physical person
entrepreneurs and individual enterprises with annual gross income equal to or less
than 24,000 GEL are subject to a presumptive tax in lieu of an income tax. The
presumptive tax is described in the next section.
Georgian residents must pay income tax
on gross income from all sources (Georgian and non-Georgian) received during
the tax year, regardless of where the income was earned or paid, less allowable
deductions.
Non-residents must pay income tax, but
only on income received from Georgian sources. Non-residents who engage in
economic activities through a permanent establishment are subject to profit tax
on gross income received during the tax year from Georgian sources connected
with the permanent establishment, less allowable deductions.
Taxable income is composed of the
following:
·
Salaries and wages
·
Dividend, interest, and royalty payments
·
Income from the lease or rental of property
·
Income from the write-off of debts
·
Income received from the supply of goods or performance
of services
·
Gains from the sale of assets
·
Income received as a result of the restriction
or closing of an entrepreneurial activity
·
Income from the sale of shares in an enterprise
·
Income in the form of insurance payments paid
under agreements for the insurance or reinsurance risk in Georgia.
In addition to monetary wages,
benefits are considered wage income and are taxable as part of gross income.
Generally, benefits are included in income at the market price at the moment of
receipt, reduced by any portion of the benefit paid by the employee. These
include: use of an automobile for private service; gifts of goods or gratuitous
performance of services; educational assistance to the employee or dependents;
and employee expenses reimbursed by the employer.
Table 1.4.1.1 shows income tax rates.
Income tax on dividends, interest payments, and payments to non-residents are
withheld at the source of payment and are subject to different rates. Dividends
and interest payments are taxed at the rate of 10 percent. Dividends and
interest payments received by physical persons, taxed at the source of payment,
are not subject to additional taxation. Further, taxes paid on the first 3,000
GEL of combined interest and dividends may be applied to reduce the taxpayer’s
tax liability, assuming adequate documentation of the tax payment is provided.
Table
1.4.1.1: Income Tax Rates
Amount of taxable income during the tax year
|
Tax rate
|
Up to 200 GEL |
12% of the taxable income |
201 to 350 GEL |
24 GEL +
15% of the amount in excess of 200 GEL |
351 to 600 GEL |
46.5 GEL + 17% of the amount in excess of 350 GEL |
More than 600 GEL |
89 GEL + 20% of the amount in excess of 600 GEL |
Source: Tax
Code.
Tax agents who withhold tax at the
source of payment are required to:
·
Transfer the tax to the budget when making
payments to physical persons;
·
When paying wages, issue to the physical person
receiving the income (at his or her request) a statement with the person’s
name, amount and type of income paid, and amount of tax withheld; and
·
Within 30 days of the end of the tax year,
present to the tax agencies and, if requested, to the person paid, a statement
containing the person’s registration number, total income, and total amount of
tax withheld during the year.
Physical person entrepreneurs and
individual enterprises are required to submit income tax payments in three
instalments, based on their income tax liability for the previous year.
Instalments are applied against the taxpayer’s actual liability. Payments may
be reduced if income in the current year is expected to be at least 30 percent less
than income in the previous year. Taxpayers with no income from the previous
year must make payments based on actual income during the previous quarter.
Tax payers[3]
are required to submit returns before April 1st of the year following the
reporting year. Before the income tax return due date, taxpayers may apply to
the tax authorities for an extension of time to submit their returns. Taxpayers
who cease entrepreneurial activity must submit a tax return within 30 days of
the cessation of activities.
Taxes Paid by Enterprises.
Profit Tax. Profit taxes must be paid by Georgian entities and foreign
entities with permanent establishments in Georgia. Foreign entities that do not
have permanent establishment presence in Georgia are taxed via a withholding
tax at the source of payment, as stated above. Enterprises are defined as:
·
Legal persons established according to the
legislation of Georgia
·
Corporations, companies, firms, and other
entities established pursuant to the legislation of foreign states
·
Branches and other separate units that are
structural units of the entities indicated in the first bullet and that have
their own balance sheet and a separate settlement or other account.
Georgian and foreign enterprises are
distinguished by place of activity and management. A Georgian enterprise has
its place of activity or management within the territory of Georgia, whereas a
foreign enterprise has its place of activity or management outside the
territory of Georgia. If there is more than one place of management or
activity, or the place of management and activity do not coincide, then the
predominant location should be used to determine the place of activity or
management.
Individual enterprises and physical
person entrepreneurs are subject to income tax (or presumptive tax), not profit
tax. Branches and other units of an enterprise do not pay profit tax
separately, but aggregate profit with the main enterprise, which pays the full
profit tax.
Georgian enterprises are taxed on
gross income, which includes all income regardless of its source or place of
payment, less allowable deductions. The profit tax is a flat rate of 20
percent. Foreign enterprises are also subject to profit tax, the extent to
which depends on whether the foreign enterprise is connected to a permanent
establishment.
Foreign enterprises that conduct
economic activity through a permanent establishment are subject to profit tax
on gross income, less deductions, from Georgian sources connected to the
permanent establishment. Foreign enterprises that do not conduct economic
activities through a permanent establishment must pay profit tax on gross
income from Georgian sources (no deductions are allowed), and the tax is
withheld at the source of payment. However, non-resident taxpayers (including
foreign enterprises) who receive certain types of income (e.g., insurance
payments, royalties, management fees, income from works or services) may file a
return and claim deductions as if this income was connected to a permanent
establishment. The withholding rates for certain types of income are as
follows:
·
Dividend and interest payments—10 percent
·
Insurance proceeds—4 percent
·
Telecommunication and transportation services,
shipments, and oil and gas transactions—4 percent
·
Royalties, management fees, income from
performing work or rendering services (except income earned as wages), income
from leasing movable property, income from management, financial, and insurance
services—10 percent
·
Certain oil and gas profits—10 percent.
Foreign enterprises receiving profits from the sale
of some stocks, assets, and property not connected to their permanent
establishment must pay profit tax, with allowable deductions, on the income
from these sales. Annex D provides a listing of profit tax exemptions as well
as allowable deductions from gross income.
Table 1.4.1.2 summarizes the asset categories into
which fixed assets subject to depreciation are grouped.
Table 1.4.1.2: Summary of Asset
Categories
Group
|
Types of Fixed Assets
|
Percentage Depreciation
|
1 |
Passenger automobiles, automobile and tractor
equipment for use on roads, special instruments, miscellaneous accessories,
computers, peripherals and equipment for data processing and storage. |
20 |
2 |
Automotive transport, trucks, buses, special
automobiles and trailers, machines and equipment for all sectors of industry
and the foundry industry, forging and pressing equipment, electronic
equipment, construction equipment, agricultural machines and equipment,
office furniture. |
15 |
3 |
Railway, sea, and river transport vehicles; power
machines and equipment; turbine equipment; electric motors and diesel
generators; electricity transmission and communication facilities; pipelines. |
8 |
4 |
Buildings
and structures |
7 |
5 |
Assets subject to depreciation not included in other
groups. |
10 |
Source: Tax Code.
Buildings and structures are each depreciated
separately, whereas the other asset groups are depreciated using the balance of
the asset group at the end of the tax year. The balance of the asset group is
adjusted for purchases, sales, and repairs. The maximum deduction for repair
expenses is 5 percent of the balance of each asset group. Any repairs that
exceed 5 percent are added to the balance of the asset group and depreciated as
such.
Physical persons who incur a loss in a tax year
(i.e., deductions exceed gross income) and who are not connected to employment
may not deduct such losses from employment income, but may carry forward and
deduct the loss from non-wage income for a period up to 5 years after the tax
year in which the net loss occurred. Legal persons who incur a loss in a tax
year may carry forward and deduct losses from profit for a period of up to 5
years after the tax year in which the net loss occurred.
Tax credits are subtracted directly from the tax
liability. There is a tax credit against Georgian taxes for income and profit
taxes paid outside of Georgia, as long as the credit does not exceed the amount
of tax charged in Georgia.
A taxpayer may record income and expenses under
either the cash basis method or accrual basis method of accounting, but must
use the same method for both accounting and tax purposes, and must use the same
method throughout the tax year. A physical person must keep records using the
accrual basis method for income from entrepreneurial activity.
Profit taxes must be paid in three installments based
on the profit tax liability of the previous year. These are:
·
Before May 15th: 30 percent of the previous
year’s tax liability
·
Before August 15th: 30 percent of the previous
year’s tax liability
·
Before November 15th: 40 percent of the previous
year’s tax liability.
Taxpayers who have no taxable income in the previous
year make payments according to the actual income of the previous quarter.
Installment payments may be reduced if
current year income is expected to be at least 30 percent less than income of
the previous year. Permission of the head of the tax agency, requested 1 month
before the date of payment is required to do so. Resident legal persons and
nonresident legal persons who have income from a Georgian source that is not
taxed at the source of payment must submit a tax return before April 1st of the
year following the year of the reporting year to the tax agency at the place of
registration. Before the due date of a profit tax return, the taxpayer may
apply to a tax body for an extension of time to submit the return.
Profit taxpayers who cease their entrepreneurial
activity in Georgia must submit an income tax return to the tax agency within
30 days of ceasing activities. Legal persons who decide to liquidate must
immediately notify the tax service in writing of their plans to liquidate and
must file a profit tax return within 15 days of the decision to liquidate.
Value Added Tax. Value added tax (VAT) is collected at every stage of production
and distribution. Persons or enterprises with annual taxable turnover less than
24,000 GEL per year are not required to register with the tax authority and pay
VAT, although they may.
An enterprise charges VAT on its sales and pays VAT
to the suppliers of materials and providers of services it receives. The
enterprise then accounts to the tax department for the difference between the
tax that it charged on its sales and the tax that it paid on the goods and
services supplied to it. This difference usually results in a net payment to
the budget, but in some circumstances it can result in a credit to the
enterprise.
An enterprise registered for VAT that carries out a
taxable transaction is required to prepare and issue a tax invoice to the
person who receives goods or services. VAT invoices are purchased from
respective regional tax offices at a cost of 0.18 GEL per invoice. The
purchaser is given two copies of the invoice and both the seller and the
purchaser must submit one copy to their local tax agencies for control
purposes. Buyers and sellers are required to submit VAT declarations every
month, no later than the 15th of the month following the reporting period. The
total VAT an enterprise pays to the budget each month is the total VAT charged
on its outputs (sales) less the total (allowable) VAT paid on its inputs
(purchases) during that month. VAT paid on inputs can be credited against VAT
paid on outputs if inputs are used for economic activities (offset for
charities, entertainment, representative expenses are not allowed) and the
enterprise has an invoice of paid VAT. VAT paid on exempt goods or on
automobiles cannot be offset. If the input tax exceeds the output tax, the
enterprise receives a credit for the excess. VAT on taxable imports is levied
and collected by customs agencies.
The VAT rate in Georgia is 20 percent. A zero percent
rate applies to exports and the categories of goods and services identified
below. Annex D provides a list of VAT exemptions.
Exemption means that producers or suppliers of exempt
goods and services do not charge VAT on their output, but cannot claim a credit
on the VAT paid on inputs used to produce the exempt output.
Social Taxes. Social taxes include both social and employment taxes and are
imposed on monetary and non-monetary wages and other forms of compensation paid
to employees, as well as on income earned by physical person entrepreneurs from
their economic activities. The social tax rates are summarized in Table
1.4.1.3.
Table
1.4.1.3: Social Tax Rates
Taxpayers
|
Taxes Paid by Employers and Entrepreneurs
|
Taxes Paid by Employees
|
Social Tax
|
Employment Tax
|
Social security Tax
|
Physical person entrepreneurs and legal
persons who pay wages to employees.
Physical person entrepreneurs and legal
persons who pay physical persons for services.
|
27%; not less than 16 GEL per month |
1% |
|
Physical persons who receive remuneration as
employees or on a contract basis. |
|
|
1% |
Physical person entrepreneurs. |
27%, not less than 16 GEL per month |
1% |
|
Physical persons who carry out non-entrepreneurial
economic activities in Georgia. |
27%, not
less than 16 GEL per month |
1% |
|
Source: Tax Code.
Social taxes must be paid by:
·
Physical person entrepreneurs and legal persons
who make wage payments to employees working in Georgia or who make payments to
physical person who render services in Georgia
·
Physical persons receiving remuneration from
employment or the performance of services
·
Physical person entrepreneurs who conduct
entrepreneurial activity in Georgia
·
Physical persons who perform non-entrepreneurial
activity in Georgia, including lawyers, doctors, notaries, and other
professions.
For public organizations of disabled persons as well
as enterprises that have a workforce of 70 percent or more disabled persons and
pensioners, the 27 percent tax rate is reduced to 10 percent.
Employers who pay wages to employees or to
individuals performing services must remit social taxes to the tax
administration at the time that wages are paid. Employees’ social taxes are
withheld and remitted along with the employer’s social tax payment. Employers
are required to submit their social tax returns before the 15th day following
the reporting month.
Physical person entrepreneurs and physical persons
who carry out economic activities classified as non-entrepreneurial (under the
Law on Entrepreneurs) must remit social taxes along with their income taxes.
The social tax return must be submitted along with the income tax return.
Excise Taxes.
Excise taxes are levied on specific excisable goods produced in Georgia or
imported into Georgia. Unless exempted, all physical and legal persons who
produce excisable goods on the territory of Georgia or who import excisable
goods must pay excise taxes. Exports of excisable goods are taxed at a zero
rate.
Several products are exempt
from excise taxes, including:
·
Alcoholic beverages produced by a physical
person for personal consumption
·
The import of 2 litres of alcoholic beverages
and 200 cigarettes by a physical person for personal consumption
·
The transit and temporary import of excisable
goods into the customs territory of Georgia
·
The re-export of excisable goods
·
The import of automobiles and tires for
humanitarian aid during a natural disaster
·
Aviation fuel to be supplied on board for
international flights
·
Import or supply of oil products necessary to
carry out oil and gas transactions (specified by the oil and gas law of
Georgia).
Excise taxes must be paid up to the 10th of the next
month after carrying out the taxable transaction. The taxable transaction for
products produced in Georgia is considered to occur at the earlier of 90 days
from the delivery (transfer) of goods or the moment of payment. In the case of
imports, the taxable transaction is considered to occur at the time the goods
are imported, and the excise tax is collected by customs agencies. For
excisable products subject to excise stamping, the taxable transaction is
considered to occur at the time the goods are delivered, and the total amount
of excise must be paid upon purchasing the stamps. Excise stamps are required
for most imported and domestically produced alcohol products and tobacco
products, except for pipe tobacco.
For goods produced on the territory of Georgia, the
amount of the taxable transaction is the payment received or to be received by
the taxpayer from the customer, excluding the amount of the excise tax and VAT.
This amount cannot be less than the wholesale market price excluding the excise
tax and VAT. For goods sold at the retail level, the amount of the taxable
transaction is the market price of the goods at the wholesale level not
including the amount of the excise tax and VAT. For alcohol products, the
amount of the taxable transaction is based on the volume of alcoholic
beverages. For imported goods, the amount of the taxable transaction is the
customs value of the goods determined in accordance with the customs
legislation of Georgia (but not less than the wholesale market price, excluding
the excise tax and VAT) plus the amount of duties and taxes payable on the
import of the goods (except for the excise tax and VAT).
Property Taxes. Georgian enterprises, branch offices, and other similar subsidiary
enterprises that have an independent balance sheet and settlement account,
foreign enterprises operating through a permanent establishment, and
organizations whose property or part of property is used for economic activity
must pay property tax.
Property subject to this tax includes fixed assets,
installed equipment, uncompleted capital investment, intangible assets that are
listed on the balance sheet of an enterprise, as well as such property listed
on the balance sheet of an organization and used for economic activity. For
foreign enterprises, only property connected with the permanent establishment
of the enterprise is subject to property tax.
The property tax rate is 1 percent of the value of
the property. The tax is due in four equal payments, before February 15th, May
15th, August 15th, and November 15th.
Tax on the Use of Land. Physical and legal persons who are owners or users of land plots,
including land used for agricultural and non-agricultural purposes, are subject
to tax on the use of land.
The base rate of the tax for the use of
nonagricultural land is 0.24 GEL per square meter of land. This tax is due in
equal parts before August 15th and before November 15th of the reporting year.
The base rates for agricultural land are set on a per
hectare basis and vary depending on location and use. This tax is due on or
before November 1st of the reporting year.
Tax on Economic Activity. This local tax is paid by all physical and legal persons engaged
in any economic activity on the territory of a corresponding city (region).
This tax rate is set by local governments, but cannot
exceed 1 percent of income (less material expenditures and VAT). For port
services (loading and unloading ships) the maximum rate is 2 percent of income
(less VAT).
Other Taxes.
Tax on the Transfer of Property. This tax is imposed on the transfer of real estate located in
Georgia, inheritances and gifts, and the transfer of motor vehicles. The
transferee is subject to the tax. Transfers of title, as well as certain leases
of real estate are taxable.
The taxable amount is the amount of compensation
transferred (but not less than the market price), including assumed
indebtedness. In the case of a lease or tenancy, the taxable amount is
determined by discounting the amount payable under the lease or tenancy
agreement.
The tax rate on the transfer of real estate is 2
percent of the taxable amount. The tax is due prior to the registration of the
documents transferring the property. If the property is not registered, the tax
is due at the time the property is transferred.
For property received as inheritance, the tax is due
no later than 6 months from the receipt of documents transferring title. For
property received as gifts, the tax is due within 1 month of the transfer.
Tax on the Use of Natural Resources. Physical and legal persons engaged in any activity that requires a
license for the use of natural resources (with the exception of land) owned by
the state must pay this tax. The tax is imposed on the volume of natural
resources extracted.
The tax rates vary by natural resource. For minerals,
the rate is between 1 and 15 percent (of the price of the mineral resources
extracted), timber 2–34 percent, water 3–10 percent, animals 2–55 percent.
The tax for the use of natural resources is due
before the 15th of the month following the reporting month. However, the tax
for timber and flora resources should be paid at the time of their
transportation from the forest; the tax for water resources should be paid
before December 1st of the relevant year; and the tax on hunting birds in
migration should be paid on receipt of the license.
The tax on natural resources must be paid within 3
months after receiving the license for using the natural resources.
Exempt from this tax are the mineral resources gained
in the course of underground construction. In addition, the tax rate is reduced
by 70 percent for use of natural resources in connection with scientific and
cultural activities and for users of natural resources that have carried out
restoration or replacement of natural resources from their own funds, within
the limits of the volume of restored resources.
Environmental Taxes. This tax must be paid by physical and legal persons engaged in any
activity listed in categories 1–4 of the Law of Georgia on Environmental
Permits (October 15, 1996), who pollute the environment from fixed sources or
who import or produce gasoline, diesel fuel, kerosene, natural gas (except as
used as a raw material for production of goods), or liquid gas.
Tax rates are based on the pollutant emitted, whether
it is emitted into the atmosphere or water (either directly or through sewers
and storm drains), and geographic region. For other items the tax is based on
the amount imported or produced. Imported goods that are later exported are
exempt from this tax.
Tax rates apply to pollutants emitted within limits
set by environmental laws. Pollutants emitted in excess of established limits
are subject to a fine equal to five times the tax rate for pollution within the
limit (see the section on fines and penalties below).
Taxpayers who pollute the environment from fixed
sources must submit a tax return certified by the Ministry of Environment and
Natural Resource Protection to the tax agency and pay the tax by the 15th of
the month following the reporting quarter. Taxpayers who produce or supply
gasoline, diesel, kerosene, natural gas, or liquid gas must submit a tax return
by the 15th day of the month following the reporting month.
Taxpayers who import any products subject to the
pollution tax must pay the tax before the customs agency clears the products.
Customs may clear the products only after the tax agency issues a receipt
indicating that the tax has been paid.
Background. Georgia was one of the first CIS countries to codify its tax
legislation in a comprehensive Code. However, since its adoption in 1997, there
have been numerous amendments, which have considerably reduced the consistency
of the Code. Some of the mayor changes in recent amendments include:
i) changes in the tax rates for tobacco products and the tax rates of the
motor vehicles ownership tax; ii) repealing provisions in the Code
allowing the tax administration to seize and sell delinquent taxpayers’
property; iii) introduction of exemptions from property taxation for
enterprises and physical persons in mountainous regions. The IMF carried out a
review of tax policy in 2000 and a number of the recommendations from this
review were actually included in a tax reform package prepared by the Ministry
of Finance in September 2001. However, this package has not been presented to
Parliament so far. Key issues remaining on the tax policy side are:
Unstable tax policy framework. The history of tax policy changes in Georgia since adoption of the
tax code demonstrates a lack of long-term policy planning and a focus on
short-term policy measures, disregarding the general consistency of the Code.
Such approach has led to constant changes to Article 273 (on transitional
provisions). Even fundamental policy changes are not introduced as permanent
features of the tax system, but as temporary ones. A typical example is the
cigarette taxation, which has been modified six times (!) since the Code entered
into force. New taxation schemes are often introduced late in the year, for
short periods of time and without clarification as to their duration. The
current taxation scheme for tobacco products was introduced for the year 2001
only on December 2000 and was extended for another year through another
amendment to the Code on December 2001. An even worse case is the excise tax on
the importation of pyrolysis liquid products which was set at a rate of 400 GEL
per ton on December 2000 and reduced to 50 GEL per ton less then four month
later. There are numerous similar examples of short-term tax policy measures
and frequent changes of tax legislation Such an approach neither allows the
business community to calculate its tax burden over a longer period of time,
nor does it permit the revenue authorities to design appropriate taxation
strategies and develop a long-term planning of resource mobilization. The strong
influence of lobbies in Parliament and the obvious tendency of parliamentarians
to further narrow the tax base by granting sector and specific exemptions and
rate reductions also contributes significantly to the low quality of tax policy
making in Georgia.
VAT Threshold. Currently, VAT registration is mandatory for businesses with an
annual taxable turnover of 24,000 GEL or more (and voluntary for a businesses
below this threshold).[4] As a result of the low registration threshold, the tax
administration has to deal with a large number of small businesses as VAT
taxpayers who contribute little to total VAT revenues. For example, an increase
of the threshold from 24,000 to 100,000 GEL would reduce the number of
mandatory taxpayers from around 13,000 to 3,200. It would at the same time
reduce the total VAT collection by around 23 percent. A reduction in the
number of taxpayers could substantially facilitate the administration of the
tax and help combat VAT evasion by permitting a more comprehensive
cross-checking of VAT invoices and making it more difficult to establish shell
companies for evasion purposes. [5]However, this result can only be achieved if the scope for voluntary
registration is reduced. The Ministry of Finance therefore should consider to
limit voluntary registration, e.g. by excluding businesses with a turnover
below 50,000 GEL.
VAT Distortions. There is increasing frustration with the performance of VAT and
the distortions its creates because the tax net is narrow and businesses are
often unable to deduct VAT payments on their inputs. First, despite the low
threshold, the number of 17, 000 businesses registered is quite
low by international standards. Second, a true VAT, which is supposed to avoid
tax cascading and economic distortions, requires a prompt and full refund of
the part of the tax on inputs which exceeds the tax due on outputs. This is
especially important for exporters. In Georgia the amount of unpaid VAT refunds
is large (about 29 million GEL at the end of 2001). Tax inspectors should
eliminate the practice of treating VAT as advanced payments against future tax liabilities in order to meet their
monthly revenue targets (see section on tax administration below). Third, while
many countries have introduced limited exemptions or reduced rates in their VAT
laws to reduce regressive elements of the tax, the
scope of tax privileges in the Georgian VAT continues to increase, and the
country has embarked on the dangerous path to use tax privileges as a way to
compensate for administrative or legal deficiencies.
Frustration with the distortion effects
of the VAT has caused some policy makers to consider whether to replace the VAT
with a sales tax. The objective would be to reduce compliance risks by applying
the tax to one stage of the business cycle only. There are serious concerns
regarding this idea. VAT despite its relatively low efficiency has become the
main revenue source, contributing 45 percent to total gross tax revenues in
2001. Experience in other countries shows that sales taxes have a far lower
revenue potential than the VAT, because it does not capture the total value
added in the production and distribution phases and their rates normally are
not higher than 5 percent--because of administrative difficulties.
In addition, compliance risks and compliance management challenges would not be
reduced because collection would have to rely on the retail sector which is
more difficult to administer. Rather than replacing the VAT with a sales tax,
the focus should be to improve VAT administration and actually implement the
key principles of the tax, such as an effective refund system for exporters. A
performance of the tax improves; consideration could then be given later to
lowering the standard VAT rate.
Proposed simplified tax. To compensate for the revenue loss caused by increasing the VAT
threshold, MoF plans to introduce a simplified tax for taxpayers who are not
registered for VAT, and to modify the current presumptive tax for individual
enterprises, which raises relatively little revenues (in 2000 actual
presumptive tax collection was only 5 million GEL or 0.7 percent of total tax
revenues), by changing it to a fixed tax with a broader tax base. The MoF
proposal is to levy the simplified tax rate of 7 percent on gross income, which
will require some basic accounting. The fixed tax will, similar to the current
presumptive tax, be based on the nature of the business activity, the size of
the business and the business location; it will include more types of small
businesses than the presumptive tax. Although some (Foreign Investor Advisory
Service (FIAS) December 2001 report[6])
consider a fixed tax to be extremely complicated, it need not be so. The fixed
tax, if well designed, can be transparent and easy to administer tax. It
offers no scope for negotiation to taxpayers, does not require detailed
bookkeeping, and could reduce the opportunity for corruption and the compliance
costs for taxpayers. There are some issues regarding this presumptive taxation
scheme:
The combined fixed tax and simplified
tax is supposed to compensate for the increase of the VAT threshold. However,
estimated revenues from the fixed and the simplified tax are 27 million GEL, which
is far less than the expected decrease in VAT revenues. While the increase of
the VAT threshold and the introduction of the fixed tax are laudable reforms,
the revenue impact of the reform will need to be studied further.
Parliament has rejected the proposed
simplified tax because it considers the rate (7 percent) too high and the
coverage too narrow. According to some parliamentarians, the scope of the tax
should extend to some larger businesses, which clearly reflects the interest of
certain business sectors to simplify and reduce taxation. Presumptive taxation
based on gross figures should be limited to Small & Medium-Sized
Enterprises (SMEs) with no sufficient bookkeeping, while all larger businesses
are required to keep books and records and are taxed on a net basis. There is
no good reason to extend the scope of the simplified tax to larger tax payers.
Excise Taxation. Due to its open borders and weak administrative capacity Georgia
faces major problems collecting excise taxes. Reduction in excise tax rates has
been the preferred method to improve compliance, but with no positive results
so far. Despite this experience the trend to reduce excises continues, which is
worrisome. Georgian excise taxes are actually very low by international standards
already, and the focus should more be on efficiently enforcing the excise tax
regime. Compared to the CIS country average, excise tax revenues in Georgia are
low; in 2000 excises in Georgia contributed 1.5 percent to GDP, while the CIS
average was 2.1 percent. Looking at neighbouring countries, excise revenue
performance is much higher in Armenia with 2.5 percent of GDP and somewhat
higher in Russia with 1.9 percent of GDP; it is much lower, however, in
Azerbaijan with only 0.5 percent of GDP (which is together with Tajikistan the
lowest figure in the CIS region). The fact that Georgia has managed to
accumulate a surprisingly high level of tax arrears in an area where arrears
normally should not build up – according to IMF data the amount of tax arrears on
excises was equivalent to 2.7 percent of GDP by beginning of 2000 – shows,
however, that excise revenue increases will also depend on the ability and
support of the tax administration to collect revenues from major businesses in
the oil and cigarette industry.
Income and social tax. The high tax burden of the personal income tax (PIT) and the social
security tax provides a strong incentive to evade the payment of these taxes.
Although the personal income tax has reasonably progressive rates (from 12 percent
to a maximum of 20 percent), the marginal cost of taxes for both employees and
employers creates strong incentives not to formalize the labor contract:
employees prefer current to future consumption, while employers seek to reduce
costs and increase competitiveness. Overall, the taxation rate of the PIT and
the social security tax over the net wage is 68 percent. This implies that for
each additional GEL paid to worker in net wage, there is 0.68 GEL to be paid in
taxes if the contract is formalized. Financing of the pension system continues
to suffer from low compliance in the area of social taxes. (for more details
see Social Protection Chapter).
Corporate and income tax
exemptions. The Tax Code currently includes a
number of exemptions from corporate and personal income tax, which narrow the
tax base, increase the discretion of tax inspectors and the potential for
corruption. The IMF has recommended to review and abolish many of these
exemptions. The Ministry of Finance has started preparing an amendment to the
Code eliminating most of the current exemptions from personal and corporate
income tax. This includes in particular the exemptions from CIT for enterprises
in mountainous regions, the exemption of profit generated by energy renewable
sources, consumer appliances and energy saving equipment. However, this
proposal to amend the Code will still have to be finally presented to the
Parliament, after it was withdrawn in September 2001.
Administrative provisions for
tax enforcement. An essential feature of a good
tax code is a clear definition of tax administration procedures and rights and
obligations of taxpayers and tax officials. A reasonable balance needs to be
defined between the interests of the taxpayer to simplify taxation procedures
and reduce administrative burden and the interest of the tax administration to
effectively enforce taxation. In Georgia, the possibility to enforce tax
collection has been unduly restricted by reducing the powers given to the tax
administration in chapter 42 of the tax code to seize and sell delinquent
taxpayer property. As a consequence the only remaining enforcement measure,
which does not require a court ruling, is the freezing of a taxpayer’s bank
account. Considering the absence of specialized tax courts and the weakness of
the court system in Georgia, this does not provide the tax administration with
sufficient means to improve its compliance management. Enforcement powers of
the tax administration should be harmonized with current practice in
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.
Abolishing nuisance taxes. Earlier the World Bank and IMF reports have recommended the
elimination of nuisance taxes because they typically have extremely low revenue
yield and are a burden for small businesses. The tax package prepared Ministry
of Finance included the elimination of some of these nuisance taxes, (e.g., the
tax on economic activities, the resort tax, the hotel tax, the advertisement
tax, and the tax on the use of local symbols), but no progress has been made
partly because these taxes are assigned to local governments. However, due to
their very limited revenue potential, they contribute less than 10 percent of
total local revenues. Considering the administrative and compliance costs of
these taxes the actual revenue gains might even be negative, efforts to
eliminate these taxes will need to continue.
General. The public perception of the quality and fairness of tax and
customs administration in Georgia is generally very negative.[7] Substantial and visible improvements on the ground will be needed
to begin dispelling this perception. This also requires a political commitment
to abolish practices which protect and support special interests of taxpayer
groups by introducing special exemptions in the tax legislation, thus eroding
the tax base, or/and executing pressure on the revenue authorities to grant
favourable treatment to specific taxpayers. It will also be necessary to reduce
the incentives for revenue officials to participate in corrupt practices and to
develop the necessary control mechanisms to detect and punish such behaviour.
Efforts to reduce capture and
corruption are to be complemented by long-term strategies to improve the tax
policy design and build revenue administration capacity. Tax policy reforms
should focus on overall policy design issues instead of exclusively discussing
the level of tax rates. Eventual tax rate reductions will only be feasible if
accompanied by broadening of the tax base and administrative improvements. Key
to improving administration is the effective implementation of self-assessment
and the fair and equitable treatment of all taxpayers. Two areas that require
special attention are (a) customs administration, and (b) enforcement of
personal income tax and social security contributions.
Short-term Reform Priorities. While substantial capacity building in
tax and customs requires long-term strategies, there are a number of essential
short-term reform initiatives, which should be launched immediately, to improve
revenue performance and reduce tax-related distortions.
Tax policy. The main challenge is to stabilize the
tax policy framework, and avoid ad-hoc short-term policy measures. In general,
the revenue impact of tax exemptions should be properly analyzed, and no
further exemptions/tax reductions should be introduced without such analysis is
explicitly presented in Parliament. Any tax policy changes should be taken in
the context of the annual budget. It also recommended that the 2001 tax package
prepared by MoF be re-submitted to Parliament, including key elements such as:
reducing the scope of exemptions, raising the VAT threshold to GEL 100,000 (or
US$50,000) and introducing complementary simplified tax.
Tax administration. A number of actions could be take to
support long-term reform efforts:
Discontinue the practice of soliciting
advanced payments to meet revenue targets and Design a new performance
measurement system with appropriate indicators, supplemented by special
incentives to improve revenue administration practices;
Centralize revenue accounts in the
Treasury and make payments on “a first come first served basis”;
Begin implementation of special
program to control imports through the railway system, especially of petroleum
products;
Increase coverage of LTI and focus on
improving LTI performance.
- Prepare legislative changes to
reintroduce sufficient powers for the tax administration to enforce tax
collection.
A Longer-term Agenda. A more
comprehensive reform program for the medium and long-term reform of the
Georgian revenue system will then need to consider the following issues:
Broadening the base and lowering
tax rates. While some taxes may
be relatively high and may promote non-compliance –
especially the general VAT rate of 20 percent and the combined tax burden on labor
– taxes from excisable products are not fully
exploited. A longer term tax policy reform objective for a poor economy like
Georgia should be to reduce the tax burden on
consumption and labor. However,
this can only be achieved by (a) broadening the tax base of VAT and
profit/income taxes; (b) increasing collection by improving the efficiency and
effectiveness of tax and customs administration.
Past experience with tax policy reform in Georgia has shown that mere
tax rate reductions without corresponding improvements in enforcement and
compliance management will not contribute to increasing tax compliance. Rate
reductions therefore do seem not feasible as long as
revenue losses from the rate reduction cannot be compensated by a broader tax base and a better
enforcement. Tax policy reform in Georgia therefore will need to mirror
experience with tax reform in OECD countries in the last two decades, where
rate reductions (mainly in the area of direct
taxation) were achieved through base broadening and improving tax
administration.
VAT Reform. The VAT should not be replaced by a
sales tax. Rather, the VAT as the mainstay of the revenue system in Georgia
should be strengthened. The VAT design appears buoyant, albeit if its base has
been eroded by exemptions, privileges, and fraudulent practices involving both
tax inspectors and tax payers. Increasing the threshold and reducing the
number of taxpayers will help improve its administration and implement the true
spirit of the VAT. Corresponding decreases in revenues can be compensated by
introducing a simplified tax, as proposed by Government, and reducing
exemptions to broaden the tax base. The implementation of a true VAT
necessarily has to ensure refunds for exporters and zero rated goods. On the
administrative side, it is important to advance existing initiatives to improve
cross-checking, monitor registration, and regulate invoices.
Tax Simplification. The elimination of nuisance taxes will facilitate administration
and reduce the administrative burden on small businesses. In Georgia, nuisance
taxes are local taxes generating little revenue. The best would be to eliminate
these taxes and find alternative (more solid) own revenue sources for local
governments, such as the land and property tax, which are not currently
collected centrally (see Chapter IV on Inter-governmental Fiscal Relations). In
some cases, these are complemented by a small turnover tax, as is already the
case in Georgia.
Addressing corruption. The creation of an Inspector General
Office (IGO) within the MoR has been a step in the right direction. The work of
the IGO should be provided with the appropriate legal and technical instruments
to carry out its function. Technically, it is important to develop accurate
assessments of where the opportunities for corruption arise, through an
analysis of the business process and the use of indirect statistical methods.
Legally, the IGO must have the powers to access relevant information from
tax-offices and taxpayers. It should also be clear to the agencies and to the
public how the recommendations of the IGO would be implemented. The role of the
Chamber of Control in evaluating tax performance will no doubt be helped as the
IGO builds up strength. The government needs to consider if the current profile
of corruption requires development of legal instruments, other than those
dealing with corrupt practices in the public sector, to address corruption in
the revenue agencies.
Making effective a functional
organization. The
centrepiece of a modern approach to tax administration is self-assessment. To
properly implement self-assessment requires changing the culture, both in
government and society, of how taxes are calculated and collected. The direct
contact between officials and taxpayers should be reduced, with emphasis
shifted to taxpayer services, quick attention to arrears enforcement and
selective but effective auditing. Internal control and anti-corruption services
should help keep taxpayers and officials honest. Appeals mechanisms should
serve to protect taxpayers rights. The extensive advise provided by donors has
already acquainted the authorities with the principles of self-assessment.
However, the reform agenda continues to be broad and will take time to
implement. Te following issues would seem to require special attention:
Registration. It is necessary to review the current
registry with emphasis on taxpayers that are not active and looking for quality
taxpayers that may be hiding as small or not even registered.
Arrears enforcement. The current stock of arrears plus fines
and penalties is large but a large portion of it might not be collectable. It
is necessary to make a realistic assessment of what can be collected from the
stock and develop timely methods to prevent new arrears from aging, setting
clear priorities.
Auditing. There should be a sustained effort to
build the quality of auditing. Special attention initially could be placed on
critical aspects of the VAT such as VAT refunds, cross-checking of credits and
fake invoices. Important to good auditing is the development of risks profiles
to guide selection and improve effectiveness. Greater information management
capacities available now have to be used to develop such profiles.
LTI.
The LTI in not a centre of excellence. Efforts to
update the roaster of large taxpayers and to reach coverage of at least 50
percent of the revenues collected by the tax agency are worthwhile, but they
have to be sustained. The LTI has to take a more proactive attitude to
performance and reform and it is good place to begin developing new incentive
mechanisms away from simple revenue targeting.
IDA Support to the Private Sector in
Georgia
IDA's Policy. To support private sector development and attract needed foreign
investment, the World Bank (namely IDA) has developed the Country Assistance
Strategy (CAS), which focuses on removing key policy and institutional
(including governance) constraints, as well as financial, energy and
infrastructure bottlenecks. On the basis of the FY03 Integrated Trade
Development Strategy IDA will provide reform support and progress
monitoring through the ongoing Enterprise Rehabilitation Project, an FY06
Private Sector Development Project, and the ongoing Business Environment
Surveys and Studies. IDA will also provide support (in conjunction with USAID)
for improving access to affordable finance through further financial sector
reform, and will help reduce trade, transit and marketing costs through the FY05
Trade and Transport Facilitation Project, building on the FY03 South
Caucasus Trade and Transport Facilitation Study. IFC will complement these
activities through investments in small and medium-sized businesses and, in
coordination with USAID, through technical assistance for business development.
Support for alleviating energy bottlenecks will be provided by IDA’s ongoing
energy portfolio and dialogue.
Support to SMEs. The Small and Medium Scale Enterprise (SME) sector is a crucial
area for potential private sector growth, and IDA has been supporting the
sector through its ongoing Enterprise Rehabilitation Project. IDA plans,
through the FY06 Private Sector Development Project to provide expanded
support for management training, creation of export-oriented clusters of SMEs,
advice to business associations and government, and monitoring of the business
environment. Additionally, IFC will conduct a targeted study of the SME sector
in Georgia to identify key obstacles to its development, and then recommend
specific improvements in the regulatory and administrative environment.
IFC Financial Support to the Private
Sector in Georgia
IFC's Policy. IFC’s
lending and investments in Georgia have been tailored to the country’s special
circumstances: limited foreign investments, the non-existence of large local
companies, limited access to financing for a nascent SME sector, and the lack
of advice for private companies on business related issues such as corporate
governance and leasing. IFC would also provide support directly to the private
sector through the Georgia Business Development Project, a five-year technical
assistance program implemented by the Private Enterprise Partnership with the
support of the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). The main
components of the project, as already stated in the above, include development
of the leasing sector and improvement of corporate governance practices. The
corporate governance initiative is helping Georgian businesses improve their
practices to build investor confidence and increase their access to financing.
This component of the program also includes advice to the Government on
improving corporate governance policies and regulations.
Assistance to SME Sector. To reach small and medium enterprises, IFC provided equity and
long-term credit lines to TBC Bank and helped establish Georgia Microfinance
Bank – the ProCredit Bank - the country’s first bank specializing in lending to
micro and small enterprises. In June 2000, IFC purchased a 10 percent stake in TBC Bank. IFC’s
support helped TBC to grow from a “pocket” bank into the largest and one of the
best performing commercial banking institutions in Georgia. In 1999, IFC helped
establish the ProCredit Bank - the first bank dedicated to
lending to micro and small enterprises in the country, and now the fastest
growing banking institution in Georgia. IFC has also supported other Local
Companies, for example, GG&MW, a mineral water
production company, where IFC’s loans supported the company’s acquisition of
key strategic assets and strengthened control over its key brand, Borjomi
mineral water. IFC’s equity investment helped the company rehabilitate two
mineral water bottling facilities, diversify its product mix and develop the
distribution network. IFC sold its stake in the company in 2002.
Development of Mortgage Lending. In the financial sector, IFC has focused on supporting the
development of the housing finance market. The introduction of mortgage
financing has allowed individuals for the first time to leverage their
residences to increase their standard of living. In 2000, IFC extended a $3
million credit line to the Bank of Georgia, and together with re-flows,
this credit line financed over 500 projects totalling $4.5 million. In June
2003, IFC provided a second $5 million credit line to the Bank of Georgia for
housing finance and for on-lending to small and medium enterprises. In August
2001, IFC provided a second $3 million loan to TBC Bank to
support the development of its mortgage lending.
Facilitation of
Foreign Investments: IFC invested in equity and provided loans to Ksani Glass Factory, a
producer of high-quality glass bottles and packaging. IFC’s The $2.5
million equity investment and $6.3
million loan supported Ksani’s expansion and modernization. At project
completion, the facility will be producing 40,000
tons of high quality glass bottles annually with a high level of product
flexibility. In the power sector IFC provided a
$30 million loan to AES Corporation to support the newly privatized Tbilisi
area power distribution company. The loan was pre-paid in August 2003, when
the AES Corporation sold Tbilisi electricity distribution system to UES.
General. The operation of the private companies
in Georgia is mainly regulated by the following two laws: a) Law on
Entrepreneurs (LoE) (Corporate Law), which sets the corporate governance
principles for the private companies (i.e. Limited Liability Companies and Joint
Stock Companies); and b) Securities Market Law (SML), which regulates the
activities of the private companies permitted to issue and trade the shares on
the securities market (i.e. Joint Stock Companies). Both laws are reviewed
below.
Under the Law of Georgia on
Entrepreneurs the following forms of commercial entities may be established in
Georgia:
i.
Sole proprietorship—An enterprise operated by a physical
person with unlimited liability and no minimum capital requirement. A sole
proprietorship is not considered a legal entity under the commercial code of
Georgia.
ii.
Joint Liability Company—A legal entity with unlimited liability
established on the basis of a partnership of several individuals or companies.
iii.
Limited Partnership—A legal entity consisting of general
and limited partners. The limited partners have limited liability and general
partners bear full and direct liability for the obligations of the company.
iv.
Limited Liability Company—A legal entity that is separate and
distinct from its shareholders (one or more legal or physical persons). The
company’s liability is limited to its authorized capital. Founders and
shareholders are not liable for the obligations of the company.
v.
Joint Stock Company—A legal entity characterized by the
limited liability of the partners. The company’s liability is limited to its
authorized capital.
vi.
Cooperative—A legal entity characterized by the
limited liability of the shareholders. In Georgia, this is a common form of
organization for agricultural enterprises.
Sole proprietorships, joint liability,
limited partnerships and cooperatives are rarely established by foreign
investors in Georgia. Therefore, the following focuses on the legal
requirements for Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and Joint Stock Companies
(JSCs), which are the most popular forms of incorporation used by foreign
investors in Georgia.
The Law on Entrepreneurs does not set
limitations on the domicile of partners. A partner in a legal enterprise can be
a citizen or resident of any country. Foreign companies can be established as
fully foreign-owned enterprises or in partnership with Georgian companies or
physical persons. In accordance with the Law on the Promotion and Guarantees of
Investment Activities of November 12, 1996, companies with foreign investments
enjoy national treatment and the same rights as Georgian companies.
Provisions of the Law on Entrepreneurs for Limited Liability
Companies (LLC):
·
An LLC can have a maximum of 50 shareholders.
The minimum equity capital requirement is 2,000 GEL. The share of the equity
capital to be covered by each of the partners may be determined freely, but it
must be divisible by 10;
·
At least 50 percent of the equity capital must
be paid up at the time of incorporation, with the remaining 50 percent due
within one year;
·
The Law stipulates that a partners’ meeting be
held at least annually. Special meetings may be called at the request of
partners or directors of the firm;
·
Partners’ meetings are required to consider
issues such as amendments to regulations, reorganization or liquidation of the
company, appointment of directors, and so on;
·
Day-to-day management of the company is carried
out by one or more directors who are appointed and dismissed by the general
meeting or the supervisory board, when such a board is established at the
discretion of the general partners meeting;
·
A partner may sell his shares without seeking
consent of other partners, unless otherwise stated in the charter of the
company;
·
Partners who posses 5 percent and more of the
equity capital are authorized to call a general meeting.
Provisions of the Law on Entrepreneurs for Joint Stock Companies
(JSC):
·
An entity with more than 50 partners is required
to have a legal form of a Joint Stock Company (JSC);
·
Minimum equity capital for JSC is 15,000 GEL;
·
A JSC with more than 100 shareholders is
required to maintain its share registry through an independent registrar (In
2003 amendments were adopted into the law requiring that a JSC with more than
50 shareholders is required to maintain its share registry through an
independent registrar);
·
A general shareholders' meeting must be held in
two months time form publishing annual financial accounts;
·
A general shareholders' meeting is entitled to
elect the supervisory board members, make amendments into the charter of the
company, approve the annual report presented by the company directors, elect
auditors and so on;
·
Creation of a supervisory board is mandatory for
a JSC. Supervisory boards must have between 3 and 21 members, but the number
must be divisible by 3. The Law provides for representation of company staff on
the supervisory board (up to 1/3 of the members);
·
Supervisory board is elected for the period of 4
years. The company directors may not be the members of the supervisory board;
·
Supervisory board meeting must be held al least
once in a quarter;
·
Day-to-day management of the company is carried
out by one or more directors who are appointed and dismissed by the supervisory
board;
·
Supervisory board oversees the activities
carried out by the company directors, checks the annual financial accounts,
appoints and dismisses the company directors, etc.;
·
The consent of the supervisory board is needed
to conduct the following activities: purchasing or selling more than 50% share
of entities, purchasing or selling the assets of the company, setting up or liquidating
the branches of the company, etc.;
The law envisages a cumulative voting
for electing the members of a supervisory board to protect minority
shareholders, but this is not a mandatory requirement.
Representative Offices and
Branches. A foreign company may operate a
branch or a representative office in Georgia. A branch is not a separate legal
entity and it is allowed to engage in commercial activities that would
constitute all or part of the activities of foreign head office. For purposes
of registration, representative offices are treated as branches and are obliged
to fulfil the same requirements.
All actions on behalf of a company can
be performed by the head of the company (executive body) or by any person
authorized to perform such actions by a power of attorney of the relevant body
of the company. Foreign legal entities bear full liability for the activities
of branches or representative offices.
Analysis - Law on Entrepreneurs
(LoE). As the main
company law for Georgia, the Law on Entrepreneurs provides a good basis for
corporate governance for all the private companies including those with traded
securities. However, based on the experience of other central and eastern
European countries, there are several provisions in the Law on Entrepreneurs
that could be amended to further strengthen the corporate governance
provisions. They are: (1) although the LoE envisages a cumulative voting for electing the members of a supervisory board to
protect minority shareholders, it should be made a mandatory requirement. As a
result, there will be a mandatory cumulative voting for members of supervisory
boards as a means of allowing shareholders with small shareholdings to vote at
least one member of the supervisory board; (2) requirement that the
shareholders’ meeting approve the auditing company’s contract (covering the
scope of work and annual auditing fees) so that shareholders interested in a
highly quality audit, requiring more time from the auditing company, can obtain
such an audit, and (3) There is a need to establish a minimum quorum below
which no shareholders’ meeting may be considered valid; (4) although the LoE
requires the financial statements of JSCs to be prepared on the basis of the
International Accounting Standards (IAS), it does not specifically require that
audits are conducted in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing
(ISA), which needs to be amended; and (5) the LoE does not provide takeover
rules to protect the interests of minority shareholders.
More specifically, the World Bank (WB)
and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) conducted the Assessment of the
Implementation of the Corporate Governance Principles of the Organisation of
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in Georgia. It is interesting to
note that the assessment identified a number of the shortcomings in the
corporate governance practice existing in Georgia. Namely, according to the
study: (i) There are uncertainties in knowing if shareholders are sharing in
company’s profits; (ii) It is not uncommon practice of failing to hold the
required shareholders’ meetings; (iii) Markets for corporate control are
limited; (iv) Court system has not yet made any decisions on the cases
concerning corporate disputes; (v) Minor role is played by
supervisory boards in the strategic guidance of companies; (vi) There is a less
than complete disclosure by most reporting companies, particularly of financial
and operating results; (vii) There are weak auditing
practices;
More detailed results of the assessment are summarised in
Table 1.2.1.1 below:
Table 1.2.1.1.
Georgia: Assessment of the Implementation of the OECD Principles
of Corporate
Governance
OECD Principles
of Corporate Governance
|
O[8]
|
LO[9]
|
MNO[10]
|
NO[11]
|
NA[12]
|
Comments
|
Principle 1 - Basic shareholder rights. The
corporate governance framework should protect shareholders’ rights. Basic
shareholder rights include the right to: (i) secure methods of ownership
registration; (ii) convey or transfer shares; (iii) obtain relevant
information on the corporation on a timely and regular basis; (iv)
participate and vote in general shareholder meetings; (v) elect members of
the (supervisory) board; and (vi) share in the profits of the corporation.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Difficult
to access the records of the court enterprise registers and uncertainties in
knowing if shareholders are sharing in company’s profits |
Principle
2 - Fundamental corporate changes. Shareholders have the right to
participate in, and to be sufficiently informed on, decisions concerning
fundamental corporate changes, such as: (i) amendments to the governing
documents of the company; (ii) the authorization of additional shares; and
(iii) extraordinary transactions that in effect result in the sale of the
company.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
3 - Shareholder meetings. Shareholders should have the opportunity to participate
effectively and vote in general shareholder meetings and should be informed
of the rules, including voting procedures that govern shareholder meetings.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Not
uncommon practice of failing to hold the required shareholders’ meetings |
Principle
4 - Proportionate control. Capital structures and arrangements that enable certain
shareholders to obtain a degree of control disproportionate to their equity
ownership should be disclosed.
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
5 - Markets for corporate control. Markets for corporate control should be
allowed to function in an efficient and transparent manner. The rules and
procedures governing the acquisition of corporate control in the capital
markets, and extraordinary transactions such as mergers and sales of
substantial portions of corporate assets, should be clearly articulated and
disclosed so that investors understand their rights and recourse.
Transactions should occur at transparent prices and under fair conditions
that protect the rights of all shareholders according to their class.
Anti-takeover devices should not be used to shield management from
accountability.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Limited
by low liquidity in stock market |
Principle
6 - Equal treatment of shareholders. The corporate governance framework
should ensure the equitable treatment of all shareholders, including minority
and foreign shareholders. All shareholders should have the opportunity to
obtain effective redress for violation of their rights.
All
shareholders of the same class should be treated equally. Within any class,
all shareholders should have the same voting rights. All investors should be
able to obtain information about the voting rights attached to all classes of
shares before they purchase. Any changes in voting rights should be subject
to shareholder vote.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Effective
redress requires review under a court system that is heavily overburdened and
has not yet made any decisions on similar cases |
Principle
7 - Procedures for shareholder meetings. Processes and procedures for general
shareholder meetings should allow for equitable treatment of all
shareholders. Company procedures should not make it unduly difficult or
expensive to cast votes.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
8 - Insider trading. Insider trading and abusive self-dealing should be prohibited.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Effectiveness
of legal restrictions limited by low liquidity of the stock exchange and
small size of the business community |
Principle
9 - Insider disclosure. Members of the (supervisory) board and management board should
be required to disclose any material interests they have in transactions or
matters affecting the corporation.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Minor
role played by supervisory boards in the strategic guidance of companies |
Principle
10 - Rights of stakeholders. The corporate governance framework should recognize the
rights of the stakeholders as established by law and encourage active
cooperation between corporations and stakeholders in creating wealth, jobs,
and the sustainability of financially sound enterprises.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
11 - Corporate disclosure. The corporate governance framework should ensure that timely and
accurate disclosure is made on all material matters regarding the corporation,
including the financial situation, performance, ownership and governance of
the company. Channels for disseminating information should provide for fair,
timely and cost-efficient access to relevant information by users.
Disclosure
should include, but not be limited to, material information on: (i) the
financial and operating results of the company; (ii) major share ownership
and voting rights; (iii) members of the board and key executives, and their
remuneration; (iv) material foreseeable risk factors; (v) material issues
regarding employees and other stakeholders; (vi) governance structures and
policies.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Less
than complete disclosure by most reporting companies, particularly of
financial and operating results |
Principle
12 - Accounting and auditing. Information should be prepared, audited and disclosed in
accordance with high quality standards of accounting, financial and
non-financial disclosure, and audit. An annual audit should be conducted by
an independent auditor in order to provide an external and objective
assurance on the way in which financial statements have been prepared and
presented.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Weak
auditing practices and an audit law that allows liability to be capped in the
contract between the company and the auditor |
Principle
13 - (Supervisory) Board responsibilities. The corporate governance framework
should ensure the strategic guidance of the company, the effective monitoring
of management by the (supervisory) board, and the (supervisory) board’s
accountability to the company and the shareholders.
(Supervisory)
Board members should act on a fully informed basis, in good faith, with due
diligence and care, and in the best interests of the company and the
shareholders.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Absence
of detailed guidelines for supervisory boards |
The Securities Market Law (SML)
regulates the Joint Stock Companies whose shares are traded at Georgian Stock
Exchange.
The main principles of the Securities
Market Law (SML) are the following:
The purpose of the Law is to develop
securities market in Georgia, to protect the investors' interests on securities
market, as well as to establish fair and transparent public trading in
securities and free competition;
The Georgian Securities Market is
regulated by the National Securities Commission of Georgia (NSCG);
The public offering of securities is
an offer to sell securities directly or indirectly on behalf of the issuer to
at least 100 persons or to unspecified numbers of persons;
A company, which has a class of
Publicly Held Securities, shall be deemed to be a reporting company;
All reporting companies shall prepare
and submit to the National Securities Commission of Georgia (NSCG) and publish
or distribute to registered owners:
I.
Annual reports;
(b) Semi-annual reports; and
(c) Current reports.
II.
Every person who is a member of a managing body
of a reporting company shall file with the National Securities Commission of
Georgia (NSCG) a report regarding the percentage of this company's securities
of which he is the beneficial owner;
III.
A person, acting independently or together with
other persons (a "group"), shall inform the National Securities
Commission of Georgia (NSCG) about the substantial acquisition of securities;
IV.
Substantial acquisition of securities means
beneficial ownership of securities, which provide 5% or more of the voting
rights in a reporting company and also when level of beneficial ownership
changes by more than 5% from that originally reported;
V.
Members of the managing body of a reporting
company shall exercise their rights and perform their duties: a) in good faith,
b) with the care that an ordinary prudent person in a similar position would
exercise under similar circumstances, and c) in a manner that they believe to
be in the best interest of the company and its security holders;
VI.
A Stock Exchange shall be the exclusive organizer
of secondary public trading in securities;
VII.
All purchases and sales of Publicly Held
Securities shall be concluded through a licensed Brokerage Company;
A licensed Central Depository shall
perform the following functions:
a) open, operate and close securities accounts of participants in accordance
with its rules;
b) facilitate the settlement of securities transactions without physical
delivery of securities certificates and, in furtherance thereof, provide
facilities for comparison of data respecting the terms of settlement of
securities transactions.
Licensed Stock Exchanges and a
Licensed Central Depository shall be designated Self‑Regulatory
Organizations (SROs) under this law;
The main objective of such an
organization, as an SRO, shall be to:
a)
Pprepare rules for its
members and supervise compliance with such rules;
Apply sanctions provided for in its inner regulations and rules or charter
against members for non-compliance with its rules.
Insider means any person who, by
virtue of his membership in the managing body of a reporting company, his
holdings in the capital of such company, or based upon his access to such
information by virtue of the exercise of his employment, profession or duties,
possesses inside information. Other persons obtaining inside information that
evidently originated with an insider shall be likewise considered insiders.
It shall be unlawful for any insider,
and any person who knowingly receives inside information from an insider, to:
a) Acquire or dispose of, for his own account, or the account of a
third party, either directly or indirectly, Publicly Held Securities of the
reporting company or companies to which that inside information relates;
b) Disclose inside information to any third party unless such
disclosure is made in the normal course of the exercise of his employment,
profession or duties;
c) Recommend to or procure a third party, on the basis of inside
information, to acquire or dispose of Publicly Held Securities.
Analysis - The Securities Market
Law (SML). The SML is
drawn on German model and mostly reflects the international best practice in
the field described in "The Objectives and Principles of Securities
Regulation" adopted by the International Organization of Securities
Commissions (IOSCO), but it has the following weaknesses: (i) It does not cover
collective investment schemes (CIS), such as investment funds, and therefore
there is currently no legal basis for the operation of CISs in Georgia[13]. Meanwhile, the experience obtained from the Central and Eastern
Europe indicates on crucial importance of CIS, such as investment funds, in
increasing the corporate governance standards and facilitating the trust
amongst investors towards stock markets; and (ii) The NSCG does not have an
authority to supervise private placements.
More specifically, the World Bank (WB)
and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), also conducted the Assessment of the
Implementation of the Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation of The
International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in Georgia. The
assessment identified quite a lot of problems in the operation of the
securities regulator, the functions of which is assumed by the National
Securities Commission of Georgia (NSCG). Namely, the report lists the following
problems: (i) NSCG has a seriously insufficient budget; (ii) Code of ethics for
NSCG staff is awaited; (iii) No specific oversight program to supervise
self-regulatory organizations (SROs) has been established; (iv) Inspection and
investigation powers of the NSCG over Reporting Companies and their major
shareholders are not adequate; (v) Enforcement power of the NSCG on the basis
of criminal legislation is limited; (vi) International Accounting Standards
(IAS) are recognized but are not fully adopted in practice; (vii) There in no
legislation on Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) in Georgia; (viii) There is
no market surveillance and stock watch system to detect abnormal movements and
unfair trading practices.
More detailed results of the assessment are summarised in
Table 1.2.2.1 below:
Table 1.2.2.1 Georgia:
Assessment of the Implementation of the IOSCO Principles
for Securities
Regulation
IOSCO Principles
for Securities Regulation
|
C[14]
|
PC[15]
|
MNC[16]
|
NC[17]
|
NA[18]
|
Comments
|
Principle 1 - Clear responsibilities. The
responsibilities of the regulator should be clearly and objectively stated.
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
2 - Independence and accountability. The regulator should be operationally
independent and accountable in the exercise of its functions and powers.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
· The scope of accountability is limited.
· Lack of legal immunity for NSCG staff
acting in good faith.
|
Principle
3 - Adequate power, resources and capacity. The regulator should have adequate
powers, proper resources and the capacity to perform its functions and to
exercise its powers.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Seriously insufficient
budget. As the market develops, more revenue from fees can be expected. |
Principle
4 - Clear and consistent regulatory process. The regulator should adopt clear and
consistent regulatory processes.
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
5 - Professional standards. The staff of the regulator should observe the highest
professional standards, including appropriate standards of confidentiality.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Code of ethics
awaited, and introduction of a system of independent assessment may be
considered. |
Principle
6 - Use of Self‑Regulatory Organizations (SROs). The regulatory regime should
make appropriate use of SROs that exercise some direct oversight
responsibility for their respective areas of competence, to the extent
appropriate to the size and complexity of the markets.
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
7 - Supervision of Self‑Regulatory Organizations (SROs). SROs should be subject to the
oversight of the regulator and should observe standards of fairness and
confidentiality when exercising powers and delegated responsibilities.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
No specific
oversight program to supervise SROs has been established. |
Principle
8 - Adequate inspection, investigation and surveillance powers. The regulator should have comprehensive
inspection, investigation and surveillance powers.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
· Inspection power over Reporting Companies
and their major shareholders is not adequate.
· Investigation power not adequate.
|
Principle
9 - Adequate
enforcement power. The regulator should have comprehensive
enforcement powers.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Enforcement
power on the basis of criminal legislation limited. |
Principle
10 - Effective use of
the powers. The regulatory system should ensure an effective and
credible use of inspection, investigation, surveillance and enforcement
powers and the implementation of an effective compliance program.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Limited power was well used. Faced
with a severe resource constraint. |
Principle
11 - Authority to
share information. The regulator should have the authority
to share both public and non‑public information with domestic and
foreign counterparts.
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
12 - Information
sharing mechanisms. Regulators should establish information
sharing mechanisms that set out when and how they will share both public and
non-public information with their domestic and foreign counterparts.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
No specific MOU or other agreement
/ procedure has been established. |
Principle
13 - Assistance to
foreign regulators. The regulatory system should allow for
assistance to be provided to foreign regulators who need to make inquiries in
the discharge of their functions and the exercise of their powers.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Lack of legal immunity of NSCG
staff in handling sensitive information in good faith. |
Principle
14 - Full, timely and
accurate disclosure. There should be full, timely and accurate
disclosure of financial results and other information that is material to
investors’ decisions.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Sound rule but compliance needed
(due to the lack of enforcement power of NSCG over Reporting Companies?) |
Principle
15 - Fair and
equitable treatment of securities holders. Holders of securities in a company should
be treated in a fair and equitable manner.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Compliance needed. (Private rights
of action including class action are not established while the NSCG’s
enforcement power over Reporting Companies is limited.) |
Principle
16 - Accounting
standards. Accounting and auditing standards should be of a
high and internationally acceptable quality.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
IAS recognized but not fully
adopted in practice. |
Principle
17 - Eligibility
standards. The regulatory system should set standards for the
eligibility and the regulation of those who wish to market or operate a
collective investment scheme.
|
|
|
|
|
X |
No law, no CISs. |
Principle
18 - Legal form and
structure. The regulatory system should provide for rules
governing the legal form and structure of collective investment schemes and
the segregation and protection of client assets.
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
No law, no CISs. |
Principle
19 - Disclosure for
suitability and valuation. The regulations should require
disclosure, as set forth under the principles for issuers, which is necessary
to evaluate the suitability of a collective investment scheme for a
particular investor and the value of the investor’s interest in the scheme.
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
No law, no CISs. |
Principle
20 - Basis for
valuation and pricing for redemption. The regulations should ensure that there
is a proper and disclosed basis for asset valuation and the pricing and the
redemption of units in a collective investment scheme.
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
No law, no CISs. |
Principle
21 - Entry standards. The regulations should provide for minimum entry standards for market
intermediaries.
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
22 - Initial and
on-going prudential requirements. There should be initial and ongoing
capital and other prudential requirements for market intermediaries that
reflect the risks that the intermediaries undertake.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Monthly capital.
adequacy report not audited. NSCG does not have power to reject an auditor. |
Principle
23 - Internal
organization and operational conduct and risk management. Market intermediaries should be required to comply with standards for
internal organization and operational conduct that aim to protect the
interests of clients, ensure proper management of risk, and under which
management of the intermediary accepts primary responsibility for these
matters.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
No specific
requirement of compliance officer / dept. with specific responsibilities. |
Principle
24 - Procedures for
failure. There should be procedures for dealing with the
failure of a market intermediary in order to minimize damage and loss to
investors and to contain systemic risk.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
No procedures to
manage winding down of a failed broker although other investor protection
legislation, and regulations have been prepared. |
Principle
25 - Authorization
and oversight of exchanges. The establishment of trading systems
including securities exchanges should be subject to regulatory authorization
and oversight.
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle
26 - On-going
supervision of exchanges and trading systems. There should be ongoing regulatory
supervision of exchanges and trading systems which should aim to ensure that
the integrity of trading is maintained through fair and equitable rules that
strike an appropriate balance between the demands of different market
participants.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
· NSCG has no real time access to trading
information, no real time oversight.
· SML does not expressly require fair
trading rules for different members.
|
Principle
27 - Trading
transparency. The regulations should promote transparency of
trading.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
SML does not
expressly require real time transparency of pre-trade information for direct
market participants. |
Principle
28 - Detection and
deterrence of unfair trading practices. The regulations should be designed to
detect and deter manipulation and other unfair trading practices.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
No requirement
of market surveillance / stock watch system to detect abnormal movements. |
Principle
29 - Management of
exposures, default risk and market disruption. The regulations should aim to ensure the
proper management of large exposures, default risk and market disruption.
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle30
- Oversight of
clearance and settlement systems and management of systemic risks. Systems for clearing and settlement of securities transactions should
be subject to regulatory oversight, and designed to ensure that they are
fair, effective and efficient and that they reduce systemic risk.
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
· The GCSD needs to comply with the requirement
of ownership structure.
·
The legal requirement
for efficiency in settlement arrangements could be stated more explicitly.
|
Labor Code. The Labor Code of Georgia regulates labor relations between workers
and employees living in Georgia and enterprise, institution and organization
(regardless their ownership and organizational legal form), supports to
realization of human rights and freedoms through labor fair reimbursement
(legal payment), creation of safe and healthy working conditions for all
employees and workers including the working conditions for minors and women. On
the basis of international agreements regulating labor relationships, the state
protects the labor rights of Georgian citizens abroad. Foreign citizens and
stateless persons living in Georgia have the rights and obligations equal to
the rights and obligations of citizens of Georgia with some exceptions
envisaged by the Constitution and law.
Nondiscrimination. Under the constitution labor is free. Each person has right to
choose its field of activity and profession. Discrimination in obtaining a job,
or in the workplace, based on race, skin color, language, sex, religion,
political and other beliefs, national, ethnic and social origin, property and
title of nobility or place of residence is prohibited.
Minimum and Maximum Age of Employment.
According to the legislation of Georgia minimum
working age is 16 years. Maximum working age is not determined, but pension can
be given to a man in the age of 65 years and a woman in the age of 60 years.
Working Hours. According to the Labor Code of Georgia the duration of the
working period is:
- 41 hours per week,
with five working days;
- 36 hours per week
in certain dangerous or unhealthy activities or jobs.
- The duration of a
working day totals 8 hours and 15 minutes.
- Thus, the number of
working days per month equals 21,1 days.
- Minimum leave is
equal to a total of 24 working days.
Wages. Reimbursement of labor is carried out according to labor amount and
quality. According to the legislation, minimum level of salary is determined in
the amount of 20 GEL. The nominal average monthly salary of an employee in 2001
made up 91.4 GEL. Higher labor reimbursement is considered for employees
working in certain dangerous or unhealthy climatic conditions. However, the
wages for each professional category are usually negotiated in labor
agreements.
Social Taxes. The article on Social Taxes of the Tax Code of Georgia stipulates a
new system of social tax payment. According to the tax code of Georgia, social
tax rates are as follows: The amount to be paid into the United State Fund of
Social Security is equal to 28% of the salaries paid, out of which the employer
has to contribute 27% and the employees have to contribute 1%, and the payment
to the United State Fund of Employment is equal to 1% of the salaries paid,
which has to be contributed by the employers.
Medical Insurance Fee. Medical Insurance Fee for legal entities is equal to 3% of the
salaries paid. Medical Insurance Fee for all employed persons is equal to 1% of
their income (exemptions: compensation surplus for annual leave; bonuses;
awards; pensions and allowances).
Social Security System. The social security system of Georgia is based on compulsory
social insurance. According to the Presidential Decree dated by June 29, 2000
(No 278), issues relating to the assignment and distribution of state pensions
and aids, definition of vulnerability and other medical-social expertise are
the responsibility of the Ministry of Health and Social Security. The reform in
social insurance system, which was recently carried out in Georgia, encourages
the improvement of the social security system and the establishment of private
pension funds.
Georgian Trade Unions League. Georgian Trade Unions League is a joint national professional centre
of trade unions in Georgia. The main goal of the league is to protect the labor,
socio-economical, legal rights and interests of its members. The league
includes 33 trade unions and 2 member organizations. Currently, there are 900
000 trade union members in the different organizations of the league. Under the
Constitution of Georgia all employees (workers) have the right to join Trade
Unions. Georgian Trade Unions League, together with the member organizations,
co-operates productively with the General Confederation of Trade Unions,
International Labor Organizations, Trade Unions of United States of America,
Germany, Denmark, France, Turkey, Israel and other countries. At present,
treatment of an issue on accepting the League of Trade Unions of Georgia as a
member of Free Trade Unions International Confederation is in progress.
Freedom of Association and the
Right to Collective Bargaining. The law prohibits discrimination by employers against union
members, and employers may be prosecuted for antiunion discrimination and
forced to reinstate employees and pay back wages; however, there are reports of
managements warning staff not to organize trade unions. Some workers, including
teachers in the Imereti region, employees of various mining, winemaking,
pipeline, and port facilities, and the Tbilisi municipal government reportedly
complain of being intimidated or threatened by employers for union organizing
activity. Observers also claimed that employers failed to transfer compulsory
union dues, deducted from wages, to union bank accounts. The Ministry of Labor
has investigated some complaints, but no action has been taken against any
employers to date. There are no legal prohibitions against affiliation and
participation in international organizations. The Constitution and the law
allow workers to organize and bargain collectively, and some workers exercise
this right; however, the practice of collective bargaining is not widespread.
Forced Labour. The Constitution prohibits forced or
bonded labour, including by children, and provides for sanctions against
violators.
Trafficking in Persons. The law does not prohibit trafficking
in persons specifically, although trafficking could be prosecuted under laws
prohibiting slavery, forced labor, illegal detention, and fraud. Georgia is
both a source and a transit country for trafficked persons. There have been
unconfirmed reports that government customs and border officials were involved
in the trafficking of persons. The Government has prosecuted some traffickers
using fraud statutes, but otherwise has no active programs to address the
problem of trafficking. A government program for combating violence against
women included a proposal for measures to eliminate trafficking in women for
the purpose of sexual exploitation; however, it has not been implemented due to
budgetary constraints. Georgia itself is generally not a destination place for
trafficked persons.
Effective Abolition of Child
Labor. According
to the law, the minimum age for employment of children is 16 years; however, in
exceptional cases, the minimum age can be 14 years. The Ministry of Health,
Social Service, and Labor enforces these laws and generally they are
respected. The Government has not ratified the ILO Convention 182 on the worst
forms of child labor.
Elimination of Discrimination in
Employment.
The Constitution provides for the equality of men and women. Women's access to the labor market has improved but
remained primarily confined, particularly for older women, to low-paying and
low-skilled positions, often without regard to high professional and academic
qualifications. Salaries for women continued to lag
behind those of men. Reportedly men were given preference in promotions. Of the
114,512 registered unemployed persons throughout the country, 46 percent were
women. Women sometimes, but not often, filled leadership positions. According
to UNDP, employers frequently withheld benefits
connected to pregnancy and childbirth.
Acquisition of real estate in
Georgia. The transfer
of ownership
rights on a real estate are regulated by the Civil Code of Georgia (set in
force on November 25, 1997), by the Laws of Georgia on "Ownership of
Agricultural Lands" (adopted on March 22, 1996), "Managing and
Disposal of State-owned non-agricultural Land" (adopted on October 28,
1998), "Managing and disposal of non-agricultural land being in usage of
physical persons and public legal entities"(adopted on October 28, 1998).
Real estate includes land-lots with fossils (minerals), plants and real estate
premises as well.
For the purchase of a real estate legally (notary) approved
document and purchaser’s registration in general list is required. The
application for registration could be submitted by the seller or purchaser as
well.
The right of ownership on agricultural and as well as
non-agricultural lands is granted only to citizens of Georgia and to private
legal entities registered according to Georgian legislation.
The fee for getting legal (notary) approval on real estate
transactions is different in each case and depends on the value of real estate.
The fee decreases with the increase of property value and fluctuates within
3-0,05%. The fee should not exceed GEL 10 000.
Transfer of real estate, except new dwelling constructions
(new constructions are defined to be dwelling constructions built up within 2
years period) are free from VAT. Tax for transfer of immovable thing makes up
2% of property value.
For the registration of right on ownership on land-lot and related real estate and issue of relevant
registration notice, the state registration fee makes up GEL 26.
Investors face a difficult environment in Georgia starting with the
fundamental issue of geopolitical instability. In addition, several surveys of
existing and potential domestic and foreign investors show that the business
environment is generally perceived as bureaucratic, non-transparent and
corrupt. Georgia is perceived as having significant obstacles to investment in
the areas of taxes and regulations, policy instability/uncertainty and
corruption. While the average official and unofficial fees for business
procedures and the resources required (staff and time spent) may not be the
highest in comparison to other countries, the unpredictability of costs and
delays related to administrative procedures combined with uneven implementation
and enforcement of regulations increases business risk and results in
differential treatment among firms.
As shown in the above Figure, when scores on general constraints to
business operations for enterprises in Georgia are compared to regional
averages, the constraints are shown to be worse in Georgia for every category
except the performance of the judiciary and anti-competitive practices. This
substantiates the earlier observation that the business environment is
perceived as being much more constrained in Georgia compared to competitors in
the region. Further, it emphasizes the need for the Government of Georgia to
address these critical constraints in order to help improve the country’s
attractiveness for domestic and international investors.
Time and again it has been observed that decrees and programs of
reform have been adopted but weakly implemented in the absence of the strong
political will necessary to effect change. For example, the State Customs
Department (SCD) reform committee was established by Presidential Order to finalize
a reform strategy and implement an action plan. To date, little has been done
on implementation. The committee rarely meets. Reform has been impeded by
competing agendas and frequent changes in SCD leadership due to absence of
strong political will to reform the customs department.
Corrupt practices significantly affect the process of doing business
in Georgia by increasing the cost and the risk associated with a range of
administrative procedures. From the perspective of foreign investors in
particular, facilitation payments or bribes do not simply increase business
costs. They constitute significant risk because in Georgia they are
unpredictable and uneven. Also, in all OECD countries bribery constitutes a
serious legal offence that can be prosecuted in the home country. Finally,
corrupt taxation administration (income tax evasion) and customs procedures
(smuggling) result in unfair competition for legitimate, law-abiding
enterprises.
In addition, the following fundamental issues have the impact on administrative
procedures in Georgia, particularly in the areas of customs and tax
administration, licensing, and inspections:
·
Inconsistent implementation of legislation
and lack of transparent implementing regulations and procedures. Since 1991, a number of laws have been revised and new laws have
been written and promulgated. Although these laws are generally modern and well
written, poor implementation and enforcement effectively undermine the intent
of the laws. Throughout this report, it is clear that the legal framework and
official requirements for most administrative procedures are relatively sound.
However, problems and inconsistencies arise in implementation as officials
often seek to maintain and exercise discretionary authority and control of administrative
procedures.
·
Lack of published information on the various
administrative procedures required for business establishment and operation. For example, the official gazette is significantly behind schedule
and the business stamp approval procedure is still issued by the police at the
cost of 10 GEL. The challenge of publishing and disseminating timely and
current information among officials and the public is even greater because of
the ongoing changes to existing laws. However, timely publication and
dissemination is necessary in order to minimize information gaps and
opportunities for corruption.
·
Absence of effective mechanisms for holding
public officials accountable. In principle, the
Administrative Code and the Civil Code include provisions on the conduct and
accountability of public officials. However, in practice these provisions are
not enforced. Efforts to introduce and implement codes of conduct for taxation and
customs officials have had limited effect to date.
·
Absence of effective appeals mechanisms and
the inadequate capacity of the courts. The
Administrative Code provides for the public’s right to be heard in protesting
or seeking clarification on the actions of most government agencies. However,
there is no provision for an independent or autonomous arbiter to provide
recourse. This function is apparently to be carried out by the courts. However,
the integrity of the courts is often suspected and the capacity of the courts
to address these issues is limited.
The institutional structure of the
securities industry includes the following market participants: reporting
companies (i.e. the private companies whose shares are traded at Georgian Stock
Exchange), securities brokerage companies, share registrars, clearing banks, Georgian Central Securities Depository (GCSD) and Georgian Stock
Exchange (GSE). The overall supervision is carried out by the National Securities Commission of Georgia (NSCG). The rights of the securities market
participants are protected by the Georgian Securities
Industry Association (GSIA). The structure of Georgian Stock Market is
presented in Fig. 1.3.1.1:
Fig. 1.3.1.1. The
Structure of Georgian Stock Market
2. Society
Poverty Trends. The
relatively slow rebound from the economic collapse after independence has led
to a severe decline in welfare. Georgia’s annual income per capita is about 56
percent below the pre-independence level, unemployment rates are high (16
percent in 2001) and many Georgians are underemployed. In the circumstances,
poverty, vulnerability and inequality have all increased over the period.
Georgia clearly needs to achieve and sustain higher economic growth rates to
improve living conditions. Given the small size of the domestic market, this
can be achieved only through a stronger expansion in export activities,
especially of those in which Georgia has a comparative advantage and the
potential to generate new job opportunities, such as agro-processing.
Poverty Profile. Strengthened economic
performance resulted in an reduction of poverty in the mid 1990s. However,
Georgia’s growth rate slowed considerably between 1998 and 2000, and
consequently inequality and poverty increased as measured by any of several
methodologies increased (see Table 2.1.1). Growth was affected by a number of
shocks, including the 1998 Russian crisis, severe droughts in 1998 and 2000,
and the increase in the price of energy imports in 2000. These problems were
compounded by internal and external political instability. Growth recovered in
2001-02, leading to a slight reduction in overall poverty.
Table 2.1.1. Change in
poverty in Georgia between 1997 and 2002
|
Poverty Headcount (% of population) |
Poverty definitions (lines) |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002a/
|
Official minimum
|
46.6
|
50.5
|
53.0
|
52.5
|
52.0
|
51.3b/
|
Urban
|
46.7
|
53.3
|
60.4
|
56.6
|
54.3
|
53.7
|
Rural
|
46.4
|
47.1
|
44.6
|
48.0
|
49.6
|
48.8
|
US$4.30 per capita/day at PPPc/
|
13.6 |
19.8 |
23.2 |
23.0 |
22.8 |
21.7 |
Recommended poverty line (baseline)
|
13.6
|
19.8
|
23.2
|
23.0
|
22.8
|
21.7
|
Urban
|
13.8
|
22.2
|
27.4
|
24.6
|
24.1
|
22.6
|
Rural
|
13.4
|
16.8
|
18.4
|
21.4
|
21.3
|
20.7
|
US$2.15 per capita/day at PPP c/
|
9.7 |
11.8 |
14.5 |
15.4 |
14.8 |
13.5 |
US$1.075 per capita/day at PPP c/
|
1.7 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
Source: SDS SGHH primary data and World Bank, see Georgia Poverty Update,
Report No. 22350-GE. Note: The official poverty line
uses a normative basket and CPI price data to cost it and is around 100 GEL
(about US$50 at current exchange rate) per equivalent adult per month. The recommended
poverty line was developed jointly by the World Bank and SDS in 1998; it
uses actual consumption patterns of the population and survey prices (its
non-food component is fixed in real terms to 1996 and deflated using the CPI
for non-food items); it is about 55 GEL (US$25) per month per equivalent
adult. The equivalence scale used in the official and recommended
methodology is the scale developed by SDS and used in Georgia to determine
the social assistance payments. International poverty lines expressed in
dollar terms (US$ in PPP) are per capita and use the latest (1996) revision
of the World Bank, updated with the Georgia CPI. All figures are averages of
quarterly data. a/ Preliminary estimate; corrections for changes in the
Survey not made. b/ Bank estimates using official methodology. c/ Using
0.33 as PPP conversion factor.
|
Differential
Impact of Rising Poverty. IDA, in close
collaboration with the State Department of Statistics, prepared a Poverty
Update covering the 1998-2000 period. The study found that the increase in
poverty affected various socioeconomic groups differently, with growing
differentiation among the poor, and signs that the poorest became even poorer.
Poverty depth and severity increased in the observed period by 84 and 94
percent respectively. Driven by the volatile economic environment and absence
of an adequate safety net, vulnerability to poverty for the average household
rose significantly, with female-headed households being the most vulnerable.
Although the extent of absolute poverty at any point in time remained around
20-24 percent, 40 percent of the population experienced poverty at least once
during the year 1999-2000, and 60 percent of the population faced a real risk
of experiencing poverty in the medium term. The high degree of vulnerability
of households led them to apply strategies which may tend to increase chronic
(long-term) poverty (e.g., shifting to subsistence farming, or pulling children
out of school).
Urban
and Rural Poverty. The trend in overall poverty
reflects somewhat different developments in urban and rural poverty. In 1997,
rural and urban poverty incidence were almost the same. In 1999, the urban
poverty headcount doubled in comparison to 1997, whilst the rural headcount
increased by 37.3 percent. Then in 2000, responding to the non-agricultural
sector recovery after the Russian crisis, urban poverty dropped by 10.2
percent, stabilized in 2001 and declined further by 6.2 percent in 2002.
Because of the drought, rural poverty increased in 2000, remained unchanged in
2001 and only in 2002 decreased by 2.9 percent. As a result, the difference
between the urban and rural headcount has narrowed -- while in 1999, the urban
poverty headcount was almost 50 percent over that in the rural population, in
2002 it was 9 percent higher.
Determinants of Poverty. The Georgia
Poverty Update identified that the strongest determinants of poverty risk in
Georgia in the period between 1998 and 2000 were economic: employment status,
sector of employment, ownership of productive assets and education. It found
an elevated poverty risk among urban households, households with an unemployed
head and female headed households, as well as children aged 7-15, the
disabled, those with low levels of education, single pensioners and orphans
were experiencing. The working poor are becoming the majority, often employed
in the informal sector with insecure, temporary and low productivity jobs.
Non-Income Indicators of Poverty.
Non-income indicators of poverty in Georgia, inherited from Soviet times, still
compare favorably with those of countries with similar per capita income. The
UNDP 2003 Human Development Report ranks Georgia 88th among 175
nations. However, Georgia faces a major challenge in sustaining these
relatively favorable indicators. Studies conducted by various international
organizations (UNICEF, USAID, EC, etc.), indicate that there has been no
improvement in the indicators during the 1990s. In fact, maternal mortality
rate, immunization rates, access to health and education, access to safe water
and sanitation and other living conditions indicators have deteriorated and the
quality of social services has worsened substantially in comparison to the
pre-transition situation.
Internally Displaced People. IDPs vulnerability to poverty is magnified by
their lack of access to land. Thus IDPs living in collective centers are
3½ times less likely to have access to land than the local population,
and those living in private accommodations half as likely. In addition, IDP’s
rate of unemployment is very high -- 40% among IDPs living in collective
centers. Government benefits do seem, however, to be reaching the IDPs, with
80% to 90% receiving a government benefit.
Millennium Development Goals. The estimates of Georgia’s prospects for achieving the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) show a mixed picture based on Georgia’s current
performance, as indicated in Table 2.1.2.
Table 2.1.2: Millennium Development Goals
Millennium
Development Goal
|
Present
Situation
|
Prospects
for Achievement by 2015
|
Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger.
Target 1: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the
proportion of people whose income is less than $2.15 a day.
NOTE: While the MDG indicator and target include $1 a
day, a higher poverty line such as $2.15 is considered more appropriate in
ECA given the extra expenditure on heat, winter clothing and food. (“The
Millennium Development Goals in ECA”, World Bank, forthcoming)
Target 2: Halve between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of
people who suffer from hunger.
|
In 2002, the
poverty incidence at the international poverty line of US$2.15 per
capita/per month at PPP was 13.5 percent.
While the exact percentage of
people suffering from hunger in Georgia is not known, there is no evidence
that would indicate that hunger is an issue in Georgia.
|
Likely. The Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Program of
Georgia envisages economic performance that would allow Georgia to meet the
MDG.
|
Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education.
Target 3: Ensure that by 2015, children everywhere, boys and
girls alike, will be able to complete a full course of primary schooling.
|
Enrollment rates in basic education (grades 1-9) are
close to 100 percent. |
Likely.
|
Goal
3: Promote gender equality and empower women.
Target
4: Eliminate gender disparity in primary
and secondary education, preferably by 2005 and in all levels of education no
later than 2015.
|
Surveys show no significant gender
differences in access to primary and secondary education. |
Likely.
|
Goal 4: Reduce child mortality.
Target 5: Reduce by two-thirds, between 1990 and 2015, the
under-five mortality rate.
|
According to the Human Development Report
2003, the under-five morality rate in Georgia in 2001 was 29 per 1,000 live
births. This was better that the average for ECA (36/1,000); and much better
than the average for medium human development group of countries – 61 per
1,000 live births. |
Due to current efforts and actions planned under the
EDPRP to keep immunization rates at high level, improve breast-feeding rates,
provide appropriate case management and home and in community for acute
respiratory infection, pneumonia and diarrhea and improve access to
appropriate health care, reliable water and improved sanitation, it is
estimated that Georgia will make a significant progress in reducing the
U5MR. However, the MDG target (U5MR of 9.7 per 1,000 live births,
which is close to the current U5MR level in developed countries) is
estimated as unlikely to be met, given Georgia’s very low public spending on
health.
|
Goal 5: Improve maternal health.
Target 6: Reduce by three-quarters, between 1990 and 2015,
the maternal mortality ratio.
|
Available
data suggests the MMR doubled over the last 10 years to almost 59 per 100,000
live births in 2001. Only 59 percent of women complete the mandatory 4
antenatal visits but 96% of births are attended by skilled health personnel |
Planned actions aimed at improving antenatal care
are expected to result in decreased maternal mortality. However, given high
maternal mortality rate and its recent increase, the MDG target (15
per 100,000 live births) is estimated as unlikely to be met.
|
Millennium
Development Goal
|
Present
Situation
|
Prospects
for Achievement by 2015
|
Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases.
Target 7: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the
spread of HIV/AIDS.
Target 8: Have halted by 2015, and begun to reverse, the
incidence of malaria and other major diseases.
|
HIV/AID is spreading fast. The number of
new HIV cases in 1997 increased nearly threefold compared with the previous
year and accounted 21 cases; in 2001 93 cases were registered. From 1998
through 2001 more then a half of newly registered HIV cases have been
attributed to IDUs. The percentage of new cases attributed to heterosexual
contacts also increases, suggesting that the epidemic is leaking into the
general population. HIV/AIDS is predominantly present in young people (21-35
years old). In 2001 over 87 percent of all new AIDS cases have been detected
in 26-35 age group.
The prevalence of TB has increased from
28.2 in 1991 to 85.8 in 2001, reflecting the spread of disease, but also better
recording of incidence.
|
While Georgia has improved HIV recording
and reporting, there is an urgent need to introduce prevention &
education on a broad basis, as well as surveillance among high risk groups. The
MDG target for HIV/AIDS is unlikely to be met
Political commitment and additional
resources are required to keep the spread of TB under control. An upcoming
PHC Development program is expected to further improve the effectiveness of
control measures. If measures are appropriately implemented, it is
possible to arrest and reverse the trend.
|
Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability.
Target 9: Integrate the principles of sustainable
development into country policies and programs and reverse the loss of
environmental resources.
Target 10: Halve by 2015 the proportion of people without
sustainable access to safe drinking water.
|
The National
Environmental Action Plan and Biodiversity Strategy are a framework for
environment and sustainable use of natural resources. The EDPRP highlights steps
to mainstream environment into development, but implementation is limited.
An environmental permitting system and other legislation are in place, but
institutional weaknesses (unclear responsibilities, weak monitoring and
enforcement, sometimes excessive and non-transparent regulations) limit
enforcement. With regard the specific indicators, despite its unique
ecosystems in Georgia 2.8% of the land area is protected to maintain
biological diversity compared with the world average of 6.5%. Forest cover is
40% but the quality of management is inadequate. Energy intensity and carbon
emissions indicators are not high, but there are severe problems with
delivery of energy services to the population.
In 1999, about 86% of urban population
and 43% of rural population had access to piped water supply. Reliability
and quality of services are serious problems. Water systems are largely in a
state of severe disrepair. Low capacity of people to pay for the services
together with limited government budgets represent real constraints to
mobilize resources into the sector. Involvement of IFIs is critical to avoid
total collapse of sector.
|
Political will
and strong commitment as well as human and financial resources are needed to
ensure environmental sustainability. If the governance environment and
institutional capacity improve, and if resources for environment and natural
resource management could be increased, it would be possible to meet
target 9.
About US$ 8-10 million annually will be
needed for the rehabilitation of old deteriorated existing systems and
expansion of access to piped water supply to an additional 0.5 million
people if the target 10 were to be met. Given current low level of
investments in the sector, it is unlikely that Georgia will meet this
target.
|
3. Economics
Sectoral Growth. Agriculture,
industry, trade and transport dominate the structure of the Georgian economy.
Agriculture is the largest sector accounting for just under 20 percent of GDP
and 50 percent of employment, although its share in GDP has decreased
steadily (from over 30 percent of GDP in 1996). Industry contributes about 14
percent of GDP and 6 percent of employment, with its share changing little.
The share of transport and telecommunications has nearly tripled from 4.6
percent in 1996 to 12.1 percent by 2002. Transport has been the fastest
growing sector, growing at over 20 percent annually because of the rapid
expansion of oil transit from the Caspian Sea. Although transport turnover has
tripled, it is still at one third of the pre-independence level. Other fast
growing sectors include construction and financial services. Trade has grown
slightly faster than overall GDP. Sectoral growth index is presented in Fig.
3.1.1.
According to
information from 2001 88.6% of the economically active population was employed,
thus the unemployment rate was 11.4%.
The distribution of
the employed work force by economic sectors is as follows:
Sector
|
%
|
Agriculture
& forestry, fishery |
53,4 |
Mining
Industry |
0,3 |
Processing
Industry |
6,5 |
Energy, gas or
water production and supply |
1,2 |
Construction |
1,6 |
Trade &
household goods technical service |
8,6 |
Hotels &
Restaurants |
0,9 |
Transport,
Warehouse economy and communications |
4,0 |
Financial
mediation |
0,7 |
Operations
with real estate, lease (rent) and business activity, research and projecting
works |
2,1 |
State
management and self-defense, compulsory social insurance |
5,8 |
Education |
7,4 |
Health care
and social service |
4,3 |
Other
communal, social and personal service, culture, entertainment, rest |
2,4 |
Hired
(engaged) service in private domestic economy |
0,4 |
Ex-territorial
(International) organization |
0,1 |
Unidentified |
0,1 |
Total |
100 |
According to 2001 data, the minimum
subsistence level for a medium sized family (4 persons) at average prices was
205.2 GEL.
Introduction. Only 44 percent of Georgia’s land is used for agriculture.
Twenty-six percent is arable land, 9 percent is used for perennials, 65 percent
is pastureland, and 0.4 percent is fellow land. Sixty percent of the arable
land needs artificial irrigation. The soil is mainly moderately fertile and
easy to cultivate. Table 1 below shows the distribution of the agricultural
land by agricultural product.
Table 1 Distribution of
Agricultural Land by Product
Product |
Land occupied (thousand ha) |
Cereals |
379,0 |
Citrus |
10,9 |
Fruit |
60,0 |
Potato |
34,0 |
Sunflower |
40,0 |
Tea |
40,0 |
Vegetables |
40,0 |
Vineyards |
61,3 |
In the 20th century, Georgia became a country of agro-industry, with
well-developed agriculture and food industry and with a good level of
production. More than half of its GDP came under the agro-industrial sector of
the country; 47 - 48% of the main funds were accumulated within the sector and
it employed 41 - 42% of the total population of Georgia.
Georgia used to be an important exporter of food and one of the main
suppliers of vegetables, tea, citrus fruits, wine, mineral waters, brandy,
canned and fresh vegetables and fruits to the markets of the former Soviet
Union. In the second half of the 1980s, the Georgian share of the food market
of the former Soviet Republics was 10 percent. The total amount of exported
food products was 1.7 times more than imported ones. The country is now
undertaking actions to re-establish this exporting.
Since independence in 1991 the country
experienced many years of civil war and ethnic conflicts, with 260,000 people
internally displaced.
However, Georgia's economy is still
strongly linked to the Russian Federation and the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS). Approximately 50 percent of its trade is with the CIS.
Agriculture is a main source of income
and employment for the majority of the population, accounting for more then 30
percent of GDP. Output in the sector is only about 40 percent of its 1990
level, but employment in the sector has doubled and it now accounts for over 50
percent of the total employment.
Land privatisation has focused on the
small-scale (household/subsistence) sector with little real progress in
restructuring the former large state farms. Land reform has resulted in the
allotment of small parcels of land up to 1.25 hectares to each rural family and
the lease, through district authorities, of state owned land to persons or
legal entities, with the aim of creating a subsistence sector for small farmers
and a market sector controlled by large leaseholders.
Private producers account for the
significant share of fruit, vegetable and livestock production, when their
share in wheat production is about two thirds of the total wheat production in
the country. The bulk of the domestic wheat production is consumed on farms for
food, seed or feed. Indications are that only 20 percent of domestic production
of wheat is marketed.
Low yields, also as a result of poor infrastructure, inadequate
access to credit for inputs and suitable machinery, and high costs associated
with transport and marketing have had a negative impact on food production and
the earning capacity of a significant proportion of the population and thus on
household food security.
The state of irrigation and drainage
systems is also a major constraint to increasing crop yields and the
competitiveness of domestic produce with imports. More than 60 percent of
grain, 60 percent of dairy products and 33 percent of meat consumed in the
country are imported.
Agricultural production in Georgia
dropped sharply in 2000 due to a serious drought. WFP/FAO Crop and Food Supply
Assessment mission carried out in mid-August 2000 estimates that Georgia will
face a severe food crisis due to the drought. This situation is being
exacerbated by on-going serious economic problems.
After droughts, agricultural
production showed a slight increase of 5.6 percent in 2001, however the share
of agricultural output in GDP dropped from 21 percent in 2000 to 19.2 percent
in 2001.
During the present year, USAID has
launched a five year program, called Support Value Added Enterprise (SAVE) that
will promote economic growth through expanded production and sales of
added-value agricultural products on international markets. Through this
program the US government will support agriculture development through market
expansion, standards on organic food production, distribution, improved credit
and whole-chain food distribution networks.
Key Agriculture Indicators.
Agricultural output per hectare of
agricultural land and per capita (US $)
Year |
Per 1 ha of
agricultural land |
Per capita |
1990 |
1195 |
725 |
1995 |
481 |
272 |
1996 |
539 |
302 |
1997 |
583 |
328 |
1998 |
531 |
301 |
1999 |
435 |
285 |
Source: Georgian
Agriculture 1999
Agriculture in GDP
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
29,7 |
|
|
|
|
41,7 |
31,0 |
28,2 |
24,8 |
25,0 |
21,5 |
19,2 |
31,9 |
28,8 |
55,5 |
70,4 |
34,2 |
39,5 |
32,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: State
Department for Statistics of Georgia (1st Row), GEPLAC , 1997(2nd
Row).
Trends in Share of Total Agricultural
Production, (%)
|
1985 |
1990 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
Crop production |
68.1 |
68.7 |
58.4 |
49.8 |
59.3 |
56.4 |
56.8 |
45,8 |
Livestock
Production |
31.9 |
31.3 |
41.6 |
50.2 |
40.7 |
43.6 |
43.2 |
54,2 |
Source: SDS, Georgian Agriculture 2000, p.9.
Agricultural output (Current prices, mln.
lari)
Agricultural
Production |
1980 |
1985 |
1990 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Total production |
3219 |
4167 |
5199 |
1851 |
2062 |
2299 |
2266 |
2650 |
2024 |
1860 |
Of which: Plant-growing |
2240 |
2838 |
3571 |
1081 |
1027 |
1363 |
1278 |
1506 |
927 |
|
Livestock |
979 |
1329 |
1627 |
770 |
835 |
936 |
988 |
1144 |
1097 |
|
Of which by
households |
1584 |
2087 |
2495 |
1407 |
1650 |
1863 |
2116 |
2490 |
1903 |
|
Of which: Plant-growing |
1102 |
1421 |
1714 |
816 |
805 |
1150 |
1163 |
1386 |
870 |
|
Livestock |
481 |
666 |
781 |
591 |
845 |
713 |
953 |
1105 |
1033 |
|
Source: Georgian
Agriculture 2000, p. 6
Distribution of Georgian Agricultural
Territory by Inclination
0
– 2 gr. |
2
- 10 gr. |
10
– 20 gr. |
20
gr. over |
Total |
Sq. km |
% |
Sq. km |
% |
Sq. km |
% |
Sq. km |
% |
Sq. km |
% |
13545,9 |
42,3 |
9237,1 |
28,8 |
5146,7 |
16,0 |
4166,7 |
12,9 |
32096,4 |
100 |
Distribution of Agricultural Land
|
1986 |
1991 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Agricultural
lands, total |
3267,1 |
3275,4 |
3048,0 |
3034,5 |
3037,0 |
3063,5* |
3018,4* |
3019,7* |
Of which: Arable |
783,2 |
790,4 |
759,3 |
781,1 |
785,0 |
791,9 |
790,4 |
792,9 |
Of which
sown areas |
730,1** |
701,9** |
452,8 |
597,5 |
616,1 |
594,7 |
610,8 |
|
Perennial plants |
357,0 |
336,9 |
307,0 |
284,6 |
277,5 |
269,8 |
270,1 |
269,3 |
Meadows |
176,3 |
158,4 |
147,9 |
148,6 |
141,2 |
142,7 |
142,5 |
142,3 |
Pastures |
1947,7 |
1983,7 |
1822,1 |
1820,2 |
1833,3 |
1839,7 |
1796,0 |
1795,8 |
Fallow |
2,9 |
6,0 |
11,7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
*Unlike to other years, this data includes
the areas of dwelling and economic buildings and yards - 19,4 ths hectares** -
accordingly 1985-1990
Source: Georgian
Agriculture-2000, Tbilisi 2001, p.18
Areas kept by some plant-growing cultures
(1000 hectares)
Culture |
1988 |
1993 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Cereals and
beans |
272,0 |
256,0 |
437,2 |
415,8 |
378,8 |
386,4 |
|
Industrial crops |
40,6 |
21,1 |
36,5 |
59,0 |
75,8 |
69,8 |
|
Potatoes,
vegetables and melons |
77,0 |
48,8 |
62,4 |
84,7 |
85,7 |
93,1 |
|
Fodder crops |
344,8 |
43,2 |
57,7 |
56,6 |
54,4 |
61,5 |
|
Fruit-berries |
128,2 |
83,5 |
85,3 |
65,3 |
|
|
|
Vineyard |
115,6 |
78,9 |
81,2 |
70,2 |
|
60,0? |
61,0? |
Citruses |
26,7 |
16,7 |
11,4 |
15,9 |
|
|
|
Tea plantations |
65,1 |
33,7 |
34,7 |
39,9 |
|
|
|
Source: State
Department for Statistics; ? Rezonansi, Interview, 04,04.2002
Agricultural production
Name |
Produced, thousand tons |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Wheat |
144,7 |
226,1 |
89,4 |
306,5 |
Barley |
20,2 |
50,8 |
30,0 |
|
Maize |
420,2 |
490,5 |
295,9 |
300,0 |
Pulses |
9,2 |
9,3 |
2,6 |
5,0 |
Sunflower |
22,8 |
40,5 |
2,6 |
30,2 |
Tobacco |
3,4 |
2,1 |
1,5 |
1,6 |
Potatoes |
349,8 |
443,3 |
302,0 |
415,0 |
Vegetables |
380,0 |
417,0 |
354,2 |
350,0 |
Melons |
32,2 |
108,2 |
80,0 |
70,0 |
Annual and perennial grass |
108,3 |
127,3 |
50,0 |
|
Fruits |
279,0 |
296,0 |
250,0 |
200,0 |
Grapes |
238,5 |
220,0 |
210,0 |
150,0 |
Citrus’s |
85,1 |
56,0 |
40,0 |
60,0 |
Tea leaves |
47,2 |
60,0 |
24,0 |
23,0 |
Source: SDS;
Agricultural production
Name |
Produced, thousand tons |
|
1980 |
1985 |
1988 |
1990 |
Wheat |
208,6 |
174,2 |
638,1 |
257,7 |
Barley |
87,5 |
96,7 |
117,8 |
Maize |
306,2 |
321,5 |
270,2 |
Beans (Pulses) |
na |
16,1 |
na |
7,3 |
Soy-Bean |
3,9 |
6,0 |
na |
3,4 |
Sunflower |
9,5 |
9,3 |
16,9 |
7,7 |
Sugar Beet |
119,9 |
61,2 |
51,2 |
30,6 |
Tobacco |
16,8 |
20,4 |
11,9 |
8,1 |
Potatoes |
392,8 |
393,8 |
337,9 |
293,8 |
Vegetables |
583,1 |
604,3 |
662,3 |
443,2 |
Melons |
42,5 |
38,8 |
Annual and perennial grass |
na |
796,9 |
na |
624,3 |
Fruits |
539,3 |
724,2 |
653,0 |
591,2 |
Grapes |
995,6 |
914,9 |
619,7 |
691,0 |
Citrus’s |
147,7 |
134,6 |
436,9 |
283,1 |
Tea leaves |
501,8 |
581,2 |
458,7 |
501,7 |
Source: SDS; Alexandre Didebulidze.
Agriculture and Rural Development in Georgia. UNDP,
Tbilisi, 1997, p.63.
Agricultural Production
Name |
Produced, tons |
1999-2001 as % of 1988-1990 |
1988-1990 |
1999-2001 |
Grain (after cleaning) |
621,9 |
640,2 |
102,9 |
Sunflower |
10,8 |
24,4 |
225,9 |
Potatoes |
321,4 |
386,8 |
120,3 |
Vegetables and Melons |
528,3 |
459,8 |
87,0 |
Tobacco |
9,9 |
1,9 |
19,2 |
Fruits and Berries (without Citruses) |
616,3 |
248,7 |
40,4 |
Grapes |
608,3 |
193,3 |
31,8 |
Citrus’s |
271,4 |
52,0 |
19,2 |
Tea leaves |
486,0 |
35,7 |
7,3 |
Meat |
173,7 |
103,6 |
59,6 |
Milk |
700,4 |
663,1 |
94,7 |
Eggs (mln. pieces) |
840,1 |
382,3 |
45,5 |
Wool |
6,5 |
1,8 |
27,7 |
Number of livestock (for January 01), x1000
|
1988 |
1993 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
Cattle |
1584 |
1002 |
944 |
974 |
1008 |
1027 |
1051 |
1122 |
1177 |
1250 |
Of which:
Milk-cows |
626 |
502 |
514 |
531 |
544 |
551 |
575 |
640 |
646 |
685 |
Horses |
24 |
18 |
20 |
24 |
26 |
28 |
30 |
34 |
35 |
|
Pigs |
1118 |
476 |
367 |
353 |
333 |
330 |
366 |
411 |
443 |
481 |
Sheep and goats |
1921 |
1192 |
793 |
725 |
652 |
584 |
587 |
633 |
628 |
701 |
Poultry |
23900 |
11200 |
12300 |
13847 |
14645 |
15541 |
8240 |
8473 |
7826 |
|
Bees (Families) |
112 |
65 |
35 |
55 |
66 |
77 |
78 |
94 |
98 |
|
Source: SDS
Data series for livestock
Year |
Cattle |
Pigs |
Sheep and goat |
Poultry |
Total |
Public |
Private |
Total |
Public |
Private |
Total |
Public |
Private |
Total |
Public |
Private |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1941 |
1607,0 |
581,5 |
1025,5 |
615,6 |
53,3 |
562,3 |
2193,6 |
1085,7 |
1107,9 |
|
|
|
1942 |
1518,8 |
607,5 |
911,3 |
475,0 |
59,8 |
415,2 |
2051,5 |
1144,0 |
907,5 |
|
|
|
1943 |
1434,3 |
631,7 |
802,6 |
365,9 |
77,2 |
288,7 |
1891,7 |
1156,0 |
735,7 |
|
|
|
1944 |
1480,8 |
658,2 |
822,6 |
424,1 |
74,3 |
349,8 |
1997,5 |
1254,8 |
742,7 |
|
|
|
1945 |
1501,3 |
668,2 |
833,1 |
484,5 |
71,6 |
412,9 |
2170,2 |
1448,5 |
721,7 |
|
|
|
1950 |
1492,7 |
764,7 |
728,0 |
472,7 |
109,6 |
363,1 |
2509,2 |
1988,6 |
520,6 |
6651 |
|
5900 |
1955 |
1319,2 |
677,5 |
641,7 |
557,2 |
124,4 |
432,8 |
1625,8 |
1178,8 |
447,0 |
8173 |
|
7642 |
1960 |
1502,6 |
671,5 |
831,1 |
581,6 |
253,1 |
328,5 |
2125,0 |
1375,2 |
749,8 |
7471 |
|
6016 |
1965 |
1457,6 |
651,6 |
806,0 |
452,5 |
208,1 |
244,4 |
2183,0 |
1409,9 |
773,1 |
8664 |
|
6610 |
1970 |
1445,9 |
616,8 |
829,1 |
588,8 |
237,6 |
351,2 |
1826,8 |
1177,0 |
649,8 |
12046 |
|
8917 |
1975 |
1513,0 |
677,4 |
860,1 |
743,6 |
310,9 |
432,7 |
1982,4 |
1256,7 |
725,7 |
14161 |
|
8172 |
1980 |
1556,3 |
675,0 |
881,3 |
950,7 |
434,3 |
576,4 |
2041,2 |
1302,9 |
738,2 |
18376 |
|
9080 |
1981 |
1564,0 |
671,2 |
892,8 |
943,1 |
428,4 |
514,7 |
2043,8 |
1284,5 |
759,3 |
18781 |
9551 |
9230 |
1982 |
1588,9 |
668,2 |
920,7 |
980,9 |
393,5 |
527,4 |
2109,2 |
1285,1 |
824,1 |
19394 |
10372 |
9022 |
1983 |
1621,8 |
664,3 |
957,5 |
1011,1 |
464,4 |
546,7 |
1947,3 |
1125,1 |
822,2 |
19693 |
10739 |
8954 |
1984 |
1633,8 |
662,6 |
971,2 |
1082,1 |
492,0 |
590,1 |
1984,8 |
1136,9 |
847,9 |
20108 |
11341 |
8767 |
1985 |
1652,6 |
668,1 |
984,5 |
1133,4 |
509,3 |
624,1 |
1955,7 |
1103,5 |
852,2 |
22452 |
13803 |
8649 |
1986 |
1645,5 |
676,2 |
969,3 |
1173,4 |
537,3 |
636,1 |
1976,6 |
1099,3 |
880,3 |
24296 |
14639 |
9657 |
1987 |
1634,7 |
674,1 |
960,6 |
1150,4 |
528,4 |
622,0 |
1938,5 |
1082,5 |
856,0 |
24342 |
14789 |
9553 |
1988 |
1584,8 |
650,5 |
934,3 |
1117,8 |
517,9 |
599,9 |
1920,5 |
1059,9 |
860,6 |
23917 |
14538 |
9378 |
1989 |
1547,8 |
609,8 |
938,0 |
1099,2 |
491,9 |
607,3 |
1894,0 |
1012,9 |
881,1 |
25172 |
15612 |
9560 |
1990 |
1426,6 |
545,7 |
880,9 |
1027,8 |
444,9 |
582,9 |
1833,5 |
970,2 |
863,3 |
24002 |
14322 |
6980 |
1991 |
1298,3 |
468,9 |
829,4 |
880,2 |
357,0 |
523,2 |
1618,1 |
912,7 |
705,4 |
21760 |
10890 |
10870 |
1992 |
1207,9 |
390,5 |
817,4 |
732,5 |
263,7 |
468,8 |
1469,6 |
781,2 |
688,4 |
20167 |
8629 |
11538 |
1993 |
1002,6 |
198,7 |
803,9 |
476,2 |
90,3 |
385,9 |
1191,6 |
550,3 |
641,3 |
11211 |
1379 |
9832 |
1994 |
928,6 |
119,0 |
809,6 |
365,1 |
46,7 |
318,4 |
958,1 |
354,1 |
604,0 |
11858 |
1352 |
10505 |
1995 |
944,1 |
78,9 |
865,2 |
366,9 |
29,9 |
337,0 |
793,3 |
222,5 |
570,8 |
12290 |
462 |
11828 |
1996 |
973,6 |
56,7 |
916,9 |
352,6 |
24,3 |
328,4 |
724,8 |
148,4 |
576,1 |
13847 |
180 |
13667 |
1997 |
1008,0 |
41,9 |
966,1 |
332,5 |
9,1 |
323,4 |
652,0 |
98,1 |
553,9 |
14645 |
8 |
14637 |
1998 |
1027,2 |
24,8 |
1002,4 |
330,3 |
4,4 |
325,9 |
583,5 |
63,5 |
520,0 |
15542 |
115 |
15427 |
1999 |
1050,9 |
15,3 |
1035,6 |
365,9 |
3,0 |
362,9 |
586,7 |
44,5 |
542,2 |
8240 |
100 |
8140 |
2000 |
1122,1 |
11,0 |
1111,2 |
411,1 |
1,5 |
409,6 |
633,4 |
38,4 |
595,0 |
8473 |
84 |
8390 |
2001 |
1177,4 |
6,8 |
1170,6 |
443,4 |
0,8 |
442,6 |
627,6 |
27,4 |
599,8 |
7826 |
82 |
7744 |
2002 |
1250,1 |
|
|
480,5 |
|
|
701,2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Livestock output (Ths. tons)
|
Production |
1988 |
1995 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Meat (in slaughter weight) |
172,1 |
115,4 |
100,5 |
107,9 |
102,4 |
Milk |
730,5 |
475,4 |
660,3 |
618,9 |
710,0 |
Eggs, mln. units |
890,2 |
269,4 |
390,1 |
361,4 |
395,4 |
Wool, in net
weight |
6,3 |
3,1 |
1,7 |
1,9 |
1,9 |
Silk cocoon |
1,9 |
0,05 |
0 |
0 |
|
Honey |
|
0,7 |
1,5 |
1,4 |
|
Source: Georgian
Social-economic indexes, 2000y. Interfax, 04.02.2002
Data series for livestock output
Year |
Meat |
Eggs |
Milk |
Public |
Private |
Public |
Private |
Public |
Private |
1913 |
49,4 |
49,4 |
119 |
119 |
222 |
222 |
1928 |
62,0 |
62,0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1940 |
75,0 |
66,6 |
251,1 |
250,1 |
357,8 |
317,8 |
1945 |
37,4 |
24,5 |
104,2 |
98,4 |
266,4 |
221,4 |
1950 |
51,1 |
33,0 |
156,3 |
148,2 |
292,5 |
210,0 |
1955 |
83,7 |
54,8 |
236,9 |
221,8 |
414,2 |
256,6 |
1960 |
90,4 |
53,5 |
221,3 |
180,8 |
487,1 |
271,0 |
1965 |
92,8 |
65,6 |
305,2 |
225,1 |
470,7 |
286,1 |
1970 |
104,2 |
75,2 |
397,3 |
250,6 |
518,1 |
310,3 |
1975 |
206,8 |
86,4 |
536,8 |
228,8 |
574,9 |
306,7 |
1980 |
143,1 |
82,3 |
654,9 |
330,0 |
642,2 |
340,9 |
1985 |
166,4 |
84,3 |
822,7 |
224,3 |
684,4 |
380,2 |
1986 |
172,2 |
89,7 |
879,8 |
237,9 |
721,7 |
395,1 |
1987 |
174,6 |
89,5 |
887,2 |
238,7 |
724,2 |
395,2 |
1988 |
172,1 |
88,0 |
890,2 |
243,7 |
730,5 |
407,8 |
1989 |
178,8 |
68,0 |
860,8 |
260,7 |
711,4 |
411,4 |
1990 |
170,3 |
81,9 |
769,2 |
263,4 |
659,4 |
402,5 |
1991 |
137,2 |
92,0 |
638,1 |
292,6 |
562,3 |
379,2 |
1992 |
113,4 |
88,6 |
297,3 |
184,2 |
469,5 |
380,2 |
1993 |
100,4 |
90,0 |
242,8 |
205,3 |
433,1 |
387,5 |
1994 |
108,3 |
102,8 |
250,6 |
239,5 |
429,3 |
403,6 |
1995 |
115,4 |
112,0 |
269,4 |
261,4 |
475,4 |
455,8 |
1996 |
117,8 |
116,0 |
350,2 |
348,5 |
530,3 |
514,3 |
1997 |
120,7 |
119,1 |
370,4 |
370,4 |
600,2 |
589,1 |
1998 |
104,1 |
103,5 |
380,4 |
377,0 |
634,7 |
627,7 |
1999 |
101,0 |
100,1 |
390,1 |
386,4 |
660,3 |
655,5 |
2000 |
107,9 |
107,3 |
361,4 |
357,2 |
618,9 |
615,7 |
2001 |
102,4 |
|
395,4 |
|
710,0 |
|
Productivity of Agricultural Cultures
|
1990 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Winter wheat |
28,2 |
12,2 |
13,3 |
17,7 |
11,0 |
20,4 |
10,4 |
26,7 |
Maize |
25,2 |
27,1 |
33,0 |
27,3 |
20,5 |
22,3 |
16,2 |
14,8 |
Tobacco |
11,2 |
8,3 |
9,2 |
11,3 |
11,7 |
11,9 |
10,3 |
|
Sunflower |
5,8 |
2,0 |
1,2 |
8,9 |
4,9 |
6,2 |
2,3 |
6,9 |
Potato |
105,6 |
152,0 |
121,0 |
130,0 |
106,4 |
130,0 |
88,9 |
112,2 |
Vegetables |
110,6 |
140,0 |
136,0 |
151,0 |
92,2 |
96,0 |
93,4 |
88,0 |
Melon |
105,3 |
60,5 |
110,0 |
94,0 |
38,3 |
131,7 |
97,6 |
|
Perennial grass |
27,6 |
16,4 |
14,7 |
27,6 |
26,3 |
23,9 |
11,4 |
|
Maize in silage |
95,1 |
23,0 |
27,4 |
75,0 |
60,4 |
54,2 |
- |
|
Fruit |
58,0 |
41,8 |
40,3 |
40,4 |
49,2 |
52,0 |
|
|
Citruses |
169,8 |
90,3 |
69,4 |
50,5 |
57,7 |
37,0 |
|
|
Grape |
67,6 |
47,5 |
36,4 |
40,5 |
36,3 |
35,0 |
|
|
Tea leaves |
90,0 |
12,6 |
10,4 |
10,5 |
19,5 |
25,0 |
|
|
Machine Park (condition by the end of year)
x1000
Technical means |
1988 |
1994 |
1998 |
2000 |
Demand |
Tractor |
27,2 |
18,2 |
10,7 |
|
18,0 |
Combine |
1,8 |
1,2 |
0,9 |
|
1,2 |
Loading machine |
26,3 |
12,6 |
8,8 |
|
|
Pumping mounting |
1,4 |
0,4 |
0,3 |
|
0,5 |
Sprayer |
0,9 |
0,4 |
0,2 |
|
0,1 |
Source: SSD
Technical Dynamic in Agrarian Sector of
Georgia
Year |
Tractor |
Grain combine |
Plough |
Cultivator |
Seeding machine |
Tractor-drawn
implement |
Mineral
fertilization thrower |
Sprinkler |
Loading machine |
1988 |
26.806 |
1.576 |
10.343 |
5.370 |
4.237 |
10.490 |
2.534 |
4.851 |
20.182 |
1990 |
26.000 |
1.343 |
8.339 |
4.370 |
3.852 |
8.589 |
2.373 |
4.027 |
17.800 |
1992 |
23.009 |
1.236 |
6.720 |
3.184 |
2.987 |
6.846 |
1.832 |
2.928 |
15.255 |
1993 |
20.800 |
1.140 |
5.491 |
2.626 |
2.737 |
5.251 |
1.635 |
2.262 |
13.823 |
1994 |
18.200 |
1.080 |
5.365 |
2.567 |
2.692 |
5.298 |
1.319 |
2.206 |
13.240 |
1995 |
15.160 |
949 |
5.216 |
2.307 |
2.018 |
5.265 |
1.084 |
1.905 |
12.860 |
1996 |
15.240 |
996 |
5.232 |
2.335 |
2.064 |
5.483 |
1.192 |
1.628 |
12.371 |
1997 |
17.583 |
1.018 |
5.367 |
2.340 |
1.910 |
5.617 |
1.230 |
1.498 |
12.110 |
1998 |
17.240 |
969 |
4.190 |
1.750 |
1.870 |
5.083 |
949 |
1.450 |
10.353 |
1999 |
18.147 |
1.064 |
4.434 |
2.346 |
1.912 |
5.610 |
1.030 |
1.428 |
10.240 |
2000 |
17.199 |
1.002 |
4.528 |
2.216 |
1.575 |
5.600 |
709 |
1.102 |
9.398 |
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: The
Ministry of Agriculture and Food
Food consumption in Georgia (1999)
|
Kg per capita |
Scientific standard,
Kg
|
Consumption as
% Of standard
|
Bread, flour, grouts, legumes |
141,1 |
125 |
113 |
Meat & meat products |
19,8 |
78 |
25 |
Milk and milk products |
209 |
405 |
52 |
Eggs, pieces |
124,6 |
232 |
54 |
Fish and canned fish |
1,3 |
10,2 |
13 |
Sugar |
24,8 |
40 |
62 |
Margarine & other fats |
9,0 |
9 |
100 |
Potatoes |
47,6 |
110 |
43 |
Vegetables, melons |
66,8 |
130 |
51 |
Fruit and grape |
43,5 |
90 |
48 |
Source: State Department for Statistics of
Georgia
Consumption of energy, fat and albumen by
population in Georgia
Index |
Measurement |
Dwelling minimum |
In rational
nourishment conditions |
Actual 2000 year |
Energy |
KW in day and night |
2.250 |
3.200 |
2630 |
Albumen |
Gr. in day and night |
74 |
100 |
|
Fat |
Gr. in day and
night |
57 |
130 |
|
Source: Gordeev A,
MSXJ, 2-2000, food consumption condition-t.2
Privatisation in Agriculture of Georgia
(1998)
|
Total
Area
thsd. ha
|
Including |
Private |
Rent |
State property,
%
|
thsd. ha |
% |
thsd. ha |
% |
Arable land |
785,0 |
431,9 |
55,0 |
255,9 |
32,6 |
12,4 |
Perennial plants |
277,5 |
185,7 |
66,9 |
31,0 |
11,2 |
21,9 |
Meadows |
140,6 |
47,6 |
33,9 |
28,6 |
20,3 |
45,8 |
Pastures |
1788,0 |
124,5 |
7,0 |
441,4 |
24,7 |
68,4 |
T o t a l |
2991,1 |
789,7 |
26,4 |
756,9 |
25,3 |
48,3 |
Privatization in Agriculture of Georgia
(2001)
|
Total
Area
thsd. ha
|
Including |
Private |
Rent |
State property,
%
|
thsd. ha |
% |
thsd. ha |
% |
Arable land |
792,9 |
434,8 |
54,8 |
257,5 |
32,5 |
12,7 |
Perennial plants |
269,3 |
181,8 |
67,5 |
31,6 |
11,7 |
20,8 |
Meadows |
142,3 |
41,3 |
29,0 |
57,1 |
40,1 |
30,9 |
Pastures |
1795,8 |
84,3 |
4,7 |
593,4 |
33,0 |
62,2 |
T o t a l |
3019,7 |
762,1 |
25,2 |
939,6 |
31,1 |
43,6 |
Source: Source: State Department of Land
Management, Land Bal; ance for 04.2001 [GFA/KfW, 38]
Farm Structures
Farm type |
Number of entities |
Total area in ha |
Average farm size in ha |
Families with private land |
1 055 200 |
762 100 |
0,72 |
Families and groups with rented land |
31 900 |
352 000 |
11,03 |
Legal entities with rented land |
6 300 |
587 600 |
93,27 |
Source: State Department of Land
Management, Land Balance for 04.2001
Share of private farms in agricultural
output (per cent)
|
1990 |
1995 |
1996 |
1998 |
2000 |
Cereals and bean crops
|
26 |
79 |
78 |
88 |
94 |
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
Winter wheat
|
0,1 |
26 |
20 |
73 |
89 |
Maize
|
62 |
95 |
94 |
94 |
96 |
Bean crops – total
|
62 |
95 |
98 |
98 |
99 |
Sunflower seeds
|
1 |
25 |
52 |
69 |
81 |
Soy beans
|
3 |
50 |
6 |
82 |
96 |
Potatoes
|
49 |
97 |
96 |
90 |
99 |
Vegetables
|
59 |
97 |
95 |
87 |
99 |
Melons
|
52 |
86 |
77 |
62 |
99 |
Fruit
|
80 |
99 |
99 |
99 |
99 |
Citruses
|
83 |
97 |
95 |
98 |
99 |
Grapes
|
45 |
94 |
97 |
97 |
99 |
Tea leaves
|
7 |
47 |
36 |
45 |
34 |
Total output
|
48 |
|
|
|
94 |
Source: Georgian
Agriculture 2000, p.36
Share of private farms in agricultural
output (per cent)
|
1988 |
2000 |
Grain |
25 |
94 |
Sunflower seeds |
1 |
81 |
Soya –beans |
2 |
96 |
Tobacco |
17 |
99 |
Potatoes |
43 |
99 |
Vegetables |
47 |
99 |
Melons |
65 |
99 |
Fruits |
78 |
99 |
Citruses |
77 |
99 |
Grapes |
50 |
99 |
Tea |
7 |
34 |
Total output |
50,1 (1985),
48,0(1990) |
94,0 |
Source: Georgian
Agriculture 2000
Privatisation in Georgian Agriculture
The least |
In private position, % |
1986 |
2001 |
Agricultural lands |
5,6 |
25,2 |
Of which: Arable |
12,3 |
54,7 |
Perennial plants |
23,7 |
63,8 |
Meadows |
1,4 |
29,0 |
Pastures |
0 |
4,7 |
Cattle |
58,9 |
99,4 |
Of which milk cows and she-buffalo |
71,0 |
99,6 |
Pig |
54,2 |
99,8 |
Sheep and goat |
44,5 |
95,6 |
Horse |
74,0 |
98,9 |
Bird and wing |
39,7 |
99,0 |
Poultry |
15,6 |
100 |
Bee family |
45,5 |
100 |
Source: Georgian
Agrostatistic 2000, Tbilisi, 2001. – p
Agriculture in Georgian Export (2001)
Export Position |
Million US$ |
Percentage and Place |
General Export |
320028,8 |
100,0 |
Incl.: Wine |
32195,3 |
10,1 (3) |
Mineral Water |
11663,4 |
3,6 (7) |
Nuts |
9843,5 |
3,1 (9) |
Source: SDS
Import of Main Food Products (2001)
Import Position |
Million US $ |
Percentage and Place |
General Import |
684097,5 |
100,0 |
Incl.: Sugar |
24105,1 |
3,5 (4) |
Tobacco Wares |
24065,2 |
3,5 (5) |
Meal |
14792,9 |
2,2 (8) |
Wheat |
11186,1 |
1,6 (10) |
Source: SDS; * -
estimate
Agricultural Export and Import
Year |
Export |
Import |
Turnover |
1995 |
9536,4 |
11652,1 |
21188,5 |
1996 |
14977,3 |
72917,9 |
87895,2 |
1997 |
12388,0 |
68032,4 |
80420,4 |
1998 |
40918,2 |
268955,5 |
309873,7 |
1999 |
102171,0 |
436740,9 |
538911,9 |
2000 |
139554,5 |
529371,8 |
668926,3 |
Dynamic of Agrarian Export, 1997-2001 (mln
US$)
|
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Tea |
18,5 |
8,9 |
11,4 |
6,1 |
5,8 |
Citruses |
9,1 |
9,5 |
1,9 |
2,5 |
1,6 |
Alcoholic drinks (instead wine) |
5,2 |
5,5 |
5,5 |
4,0 |
5,9 |
Nuts |
5,3 |
9,4 |
15,4 |
19,3 |
9,8 |
Wine |
12,5 |
15,4 |
14,6 |
29,1 |
32,2 |
Mineral waters |
18,5 |
7,2 |
2,6 |
9,5 |
15,2 |
Total export |
239,8 |
192,3 |
238,2 |
329,9 |
320,0 |
Source: IMF
(account No.211, 11.2001, pg.123;) in red State Statistic Department
Dynamic of
Agrarian Import, 1997-2001 (mln US$)
|
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Sugar |
39,1 |
16,2 |
16,2 |
24,6 |
24,1 |
Tobacco wares |
107,8 |
120,0 |
35,2 |
29,4 |
28,8 |
Wheat and flour |
37,1 |
26,5 |
14,8 |
20,3 |
28,2 |
Beer |
3,1 |
0,8 |
0,1 |
0,1 |
0,1 |
Bread products |
57,2 |
31,8 |
15,5 |
21,9 |
17,3 |
Vegetable oil |
2,2 |
4,7 |
1,1 |
1,0 |
3,4 |
Poultry meat, eggs |
10,2 |
12,3 |
14,5 |
11,0 |
10,3 |
Coffee |
9,0 |
5,4 |
5,0 |
4,3 |
2,0 |
Total import |
941,7 |
884,3 |
601,9 |
650,7 |
684,1 |
Source: State
Department of Statistic s; IMF(account No. 211, 11.2001, pg.124);
Investments in Fixed Capital
Year |
Investments in Fixed Capital, total,Mln GEL |
Of which Foreign
Investments |
Share of
Agriculture, % |
Mln GEL |
% of Total |
1995 |
127 |
42 |
33,9 |
0 |
1996 |
170 |
86 |
50,6 |
0 |
1997 |
266 |
180 |
67,7 |
0 |
1998 |
512 |
401 |
78,3 |
0,04 |
1999 |
364 |
169 |
46,4 |
1,7 |
2000 |
349 |
119 |
34,1 |
0,4 |
Source: SDS,
25.01.2001
Foreign investments in fixed capital by
fields and years
(in actual prices,
mln Lari)
|
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Foreign investments |
42,9 |
86,4 |
179,9 |
401,0 |
168,6 |
119,0 |
128,2 |
The same in
US$ |
33,2 |
68,5 |
138,6 |
271,2 |
83,1 |
60,2 |
62,2 |
Of which:
Agriculture |
- |
- |
- |
0,2 |
6,0 |
1,3 |
|
Food industry |
2,6 |
3,2 |
4,4 |
19,9 |
14,8 |
17,6 |
|
The same Gagua
(EK 3/4/00 |
|
3,455 |
4,902 |
21,714 |
|
|
|
Sum |
2,6 |
3,2 |
4,4 |
20,1 |
20,8 |
18,9 |
|
% of Foreign
Investments |
6,1 |
3,7 |
2,4 |
5,3 |
12,3 |
15,9 |
|
Source: Investment
activities in Georgia, State Statistic Department, 1999
Most Exportable Agricultural Products.
Georgian Wines. Georgia is known as the birthplace of viticulture and winemaking
and has 5000 years of wine culture. The rich land, hot sun and hard work have
developed about 500 varieties of wine in Georgia.
According to the State Department of
Statistics exports of different types of Georgian wine during first nine month
of the 2001 made up 18186,5 thousand USD which is 7,8 percent of the total
Georgian exports.
At the end of the 20th century, the collapse of
the Soviet Union has caused an economic decline in Georgia, which negatively
affected the Georgian wine sector. To be more precise – the overall territory
of vineyards has decreased by 50%, (1990 – 112,6 thousand hectares, 2000y –
60,5 thousand hectares). This tendency was mainly caused by the following reasons:
lack of enough funds among farmers to purchase chemicals, technical devices and
machines for vine cultivation, also huge numbers of farmers had to convert
their vineyards into land to grow edible products such as corn, vegetables, and
grain.
In addition, from the mid 1990s the tendency of vineyard
rehabilitation has been quite dynamic, still the total area of vineyards is far
less than it was even 20 years ago.
Table # 1 Tendency of wine sector development for the last
ten years
Sector |
Measure |
1981-85 average per year |
1986-90 average per year |
1990 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Total area of vineyards |
(1000)
Hectares
|
137,4 |
116,1 |
112,6 |
94,2 |
94,0 |
72,0 |
70,0 |
60,1 |
60,5 |
61,5 |
Production of grape |
(1000)
Tones
|
768,0 |
712,0 |
691,0 |
160,0 |
342,0 |
370,0 |
370,0 |
219,0 |
210,0 |
170,0 |
Grape
Processing
|
(1000)
Tones
|
564,3 |
422,5 |
433,5 |
38,0 |
60,0 |
46,0 |
23,5 |
29,5 |
34,4 |
19,1 |
Production of wine materials |
(1000)
decaliters
|
21969,0 |
14997,0 |
16283 |
3670 |
2223 |
3121,6 |
2303,8 |
1859,2 |
1816 |
1900 |
Production of champagne and sparkling wines |
(1000) decalitres |
1375,7 |
1526 |
1451 |
49,2 |
94,6 |
75,6 |
40,3 |
64,7 |
87,9 |
88,35 |
Production of Brandy |
(10000 decaliters |
1563 |
1865 |
2165 |
158 |
135 |
82.,3 |
37,8 |
30,4 |
70,6 |
71,0 |
Production of the liqueur |
(10000decaliters) |
937.0 |
523,0 |
822 |
103 |
132 |
251 |
112,7 |
473,0 |
430,0 |
569,0 |
Source: Samtrest, Ministry of Agriculture.2002
Even though the Georgian wine sector is famous for its 500
traditional grape varieties, the vast majority is currently grown and available
only in limited areas and numbers. Traditionally in accordance with climate and
soil characteristics – Georgia is divided into 5 main wine producing regions.
Kakheti, Kartli, Imereti, Racha-lechkhumi and the Black Sea Subtropical zone.
In accordance with the development and strength of the wine
sector Kakheti could be easily considered as the leader. The region is
characterized by huge variety of grapes and assortment of wine.
From the structural point of view, 80% of Georgian
vineyards is allocated to white grapes: Rkaciteli amounts to almost 75% of all
white wines and the remaining 25% is allocated to Cicka, Colikauri, Mcvane, and
Tetra. The dominant type in red grapes is presented by Saperavi which holds
70%. The remaining 30% is allocated to the following red grapes: Aleksandriuli,
Mijuretuli, Ojaleshi, and Vaios Saperavi.
Table # 2 below indicates the total area by regions (1000
hectares) as of year 2001.
Region |
State Vineyards |
Private Vineyards |
Total |
Kakheti |
1,35 |
43,73 |
45,08 (~ 75%) |
Kartli |
0,18 |
5,83 |
6,01 (~10%) |
West Georgia |
0,27 |
8,74 |
9,01 (~15%) |
Total |
1,8 |
58,3 |
60,1 (100%) |
Source: Ministry of Agriculture, 2002
Table #3 below indicates the information on main types of
Georgian grape, as of 2001
Species of grapes |
Colour |
Regions of prevalent |
Sugar content (%) |
General acidity (%) |
Yield of Grapewine (kg) |
Aladasturi |
Red |
Chokhatauri, Vani, Bagdadi |
19,5-20,0 |
8,8-9,2 |
2,0-2,5 |
Aleksandreuli |
Red |
Ambrolauri, Tsageri, Oni |
22.0-23,0 |
7,0-7,5 |
1,5-2,0 |
Chkaveri |
Red |
Chokhatauri, Ozurgeti |
19,5-21,0 |
8,1-9,6 |
1,8-2,0 |
Mtsvane |
White |
Telavi,Sagarejo, Akhmeta |
21,5-22,0 |
9,5-10,0 |
1,5-2,0 |
Ojaleshi |
Red |
Martvili, Tsageri |
21.0-22,0 |
9,0-9,5 |
1,4-1,6 |
Rkatsiteli |
White |
Kakheti |
19,0-20,- |
6,0-6,5 |
1,4-1,5 |
Saperavi |
Red |
Kakheti |
20,0-22,0 |
7,0-8,5 |
1,5-1,7 |
Tetra |
White |
Ambrolauri |
20,0-22,0 |
7,5-8,5 |
1,5-1,7 |
Tsitska |
White |
Imereti, Lanchkhuti |
18,5-20,5 |
8,5-10,0 |
1,5-2,0 |
Tsolikauri |
White |
Imereti |
19,0-21,5 |
9,0-10,5 |
1,5-2,0 |
Usakhelauri |
White |
Tsageri |
19,0-21,0 |
7,5-9,0 |
1,4-1,8 |
Vaios Saperavi |
Red |
Keda |
20,0-20,5 |
8,5-9,0 |
2,4-2,8 |
Source: Samtrest, Ministry of Agriculture, 2002
Today the production of two main types of grapes per
hectare of land is the Rkaciteli – 7.0-8.0 tons, and the Saperavi – 5.0-6.0.
These numbers are can increase by 25-35 % under normal working conditions and
with all necessary tools and machinery readily available.
By taking into consideration the fact that during the grape
processing period the market price for one kilogram of white grape ranges from
$0,10 to $0,20, which is slightly above of its base price, then accordingly it
could be forecasted that in the case of an increase in the volume of grapes the
price per kilo will drop and the farmer’s revenue will increase, thus creating
the ability for the farmer to procure some necessary tools, chemicals and
machinery and increase the volume of his grapes for the next season. This could
lead to the rehabilitation and positive redevelopment of the whole Georgian
wine sector, though it should be mentioned that this positive tendency will not
be implemented without sophisticated grape processing factories and new export
markets.
In Table #1 it is clearly indicated that during the first
part of last decade of the 20th century there was a huge drop in the
volume of processed grape. This was mainly caused by the following reasons:
Weak economic condition of the country, loss of traditional Russian market and
huge amount of fake vintage Georgian wines, both in the Georgian and Russian
markets. It should be mentioned that during the same period both farmers and
wine factories had huge amounts of grapes in their warehouses, which did not
find its path towards wine, simply because of the aspects mentioned above. And
this is happening in Georgia – a country, which during the Soviet period was
producing 55% of the total vintage wines and more than 25% of brandy in the
USSR.
Despite all the negative factors mentioned above, in the
second part of last decade of the 20th century developmental steps ahead
were made in the Georgian wine sector, which on its behalf has led to the
participation of foreign investors in the sector. The positive aspects were
mainly caused by the fact that a new generation businessmen have acquired
western knowledge of management and marketing, the consumer’s nostalgia for
Georgian wines, and the government’s support. Lately, the participation of
foreign companies is getting clearly noticeable – both in the fields of
wine-making and in establishing new vineyards.
As a result, the number of local
Georgian wine-making companies could be easily outlined in accordance with
their financial strength, good marketing campaign, progressive management and
export volume. These companies are: GWS (Georgian wines and spirits), “Telavi wine
cellar”, “Akhasheni”, “Tbilwine” “Vaziani”, “Kinzmarauli”, “David
Sarajishvili and Eniseli”, “Okami”, “Teliani Veli”, “Rachuli Gvino” and “Zmebi
askaneli”.
Mineral and Spring Waters. According to the State Department of Statistics exports of different
types of Georgian mineral waters during the first nine months of 2001 made up
6646,9 thousand USD which is 2.8 percent of the total Georgian exports.
One of the biggest assets – essential for the resort development in
the country is represented by mineral waters. In Georgia almost all kinds of
mineral water can be found, with more than 2,000 mineral springs, out of which
1700 are natural phenomena and 300 are boreholes. Their estimated total yield
per day is 120 million liters. The most common kind is a carbonic acid mineral
water, the daily yield of which amounts to approximately 60 million liters.
[19][1]Structural
geologic and hydrochemical properties of the so-called geotechtonic zones
account for the distribution of various kinds of mineral waters in Georgia. For
instance, within the limits of the Main Range and the Southern slope of the
Greater Caucasus – cold, mostly carbonic and hydrocarbonated waters
predominate. On Georgian Block the typical water includes cold as well as
thermal sulphide-methane and nitric-methane, chloride and sulphate. Within the
Adjara –Trialeti system and the adjoining Somkhiti Block the following kinds of
water predominate: carbonic acid hydrocarbonated or chloride-hydrocarbonated as
well as weak sulphide nitric, sulphate-chloride or carbonate-bicarbonate.
Georgia has large reserves of thermal water of various chemical
compositions. The territory occupied by Georgian Block and Adjara Trialeti
System is especially rich in them. Thermal radioactive (Radonic) mineral waters
are the main natural curative factors of the Tskaltubo and Tkvarcheli Resorts.
So-called hyperthermal waters, forming a class by themselves are extracted from
the earth’s deep levels by boring. The main pools of these waters are: Tsaishi
(Temp 81-82 C), Kvaloni (Temp 94 C), Kindghi (103 C), Khorga (Temp 110 C).
Hyperthermal waters are mostly used for heating purposes.
Drinkable mineral waters are used for
health-restoration not only at resorts, but also outside them in the form of
bottled mineral waters. Such as Borjomi, Nabeglavi, Sairme, Ucera, Djava, and
Zvare.
Borjomi Mineral Water. The Borjomi resort is considered as one of the most spectacular
locations in Georgia. It is located at 950 meters above sea level between the
evergreen slopes of the Meskheti and Trialeti Ridges.
Besides its beautiful nature and
climate, the Borjomi region is famous for its mineral waters, which represent
the other major natural curative factor of this place. Instead of natural
springs known since older times, gusher-boreholes are being used at present.
In terms of chemical composition the
mineral waters are of acidulous, hydrocarbonate, sodium variety, containing 0.5
to 1.5 g/l of free carbon dioxide. They also contain ions of chlorine and small
amounts of bromine, lithium, barium and some other substances. Temperature of
the water in various springs ranges from +17 to 38 C. There are ten capped
boreholes at the resort wit a total yield of 700-800 thousand liters.
Mineral waters are mainly used as a
curative drink, for medical baths, inhalation, and levage of stomach and
intestine. They are used as a curative and table drink outside the resort.
Borjomi mineral water is the most
popular mineral water available in the CIS. In the 1980s exports reached over
420 million bottles per year. However Borjomi production and sales declined
significantly between 1990-1995 due to the economic collapse in the former
Soviet Union
In September of 1995 the Georgian
Glass and Mineral Water company. N.V. (GG&MW) began to produce Borjomi
mineral water at two Soviet – era bottling plants in Borjomi. A short period
later the bottling plants, pipelines and quality control systems were brought
up to world standards.
The Khashuri Glass plant, located 30
km from Borjomi, has also been reconstructed. After being purchased by
GG&MW, the production process was modernized and a new automated
bottle-packaging system was installed.
In 1997, GG&MW obtained the
license and exclusive right to use the Borjomi name until 2007. In order to
restore Borjomi mineral water and make it compatible with international
standards, GG&MW found it essential to cooperate with international
financial institutions, such as: IFC, EBRD, ING Barings, and TBC Group of
Georgia.
GG&MW mainly orients its exports
towards the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Baltic States, USA, and Israel, and it
is considered as the biggest, financially strongest and most progressive
Borjomi bottling company.
Sairme Mineral Waters. The Sairme resort is situated in the valley of the Tsalabris
tskali river 950 m above sea level and 55 km south of the second biggest town
in Georgia – Kutaisi. The nearby mountainsides are overgrown with leaf bearing
(oak, beech, etc.) and also coniferous woods. The resort has been operating
since 1930. Climate of the region is moderately humid, subtropical, average
temperature of the air totals 8.8 C, the annual amount of precipitation makes
up on average 1100mm, average humidity of the air is 80%.
The word “Sairme” in Georgian means “a
place of deer”. In winter many deer and roes used to come down to the mineral
watering places from the nearby woods, therefore the hunters called the place
“Sairme.”
As it was mentioned above, the Sairme
resort is rich with mineral water springs – the major natural curative factor
of the resort. Sairme mineral waters are known since the end of the 19th
century. In terms of their chemical composition, they are of acidulous hydrocarbonate
calcium-sodium kind of acidulous hydrocarbonate sodium Borjomi – like variety.
It has been established that “Sairme” acidulos waters have a curative action
against diseases of kidneys, urinary tracts, and liver.
The only company that bottles Sairme
is the CARTU group. The company uses a German bottling line and produces water
in 1 liter PET and 0.33 and 0.5-liter green glass bottles. The only raw
materials the company imports are capsules for its bottles from Turkey, bottle
caps from Bulgaria and Turkey, and clay from Turkey. The company mainly orients
its export towards the FSU republics.
A new foreign company with better
experience in promotion and distribution could easily enter the Sairme bottling
market. This takes into consideration the fact that CARTU has a normal license
and is not the exclusive company to bottle Sairme water.
Mitarbi Mineral Water. The Mitarbi source is located near the Borjomi resort and is
surrounded by picturesque mountains in an unspoilt and unpolluted environment.
The debit of the water constitutes 40.000 M per year.
Mitarbi was bottled and very
successfully marketed during Soviet times throughout the USSR and in some
foreign countries. Success to the waters came due to their taste and curative
features. These are colorless, odorless, fully transparent waters with a mild
taste.
Mitarbi is prescribed in cases of
chronic gastric diseases, stomach and duodena ulcer in remission, chronic
hepatitis, chronic cholecystitis, chronic pancreatic disease, and diabetes.
Production and sales of Mitarbi
reached its peak in the late eighties, particularly annual sales volume of
Mitarbi then totaled 19 million bottles. After the collapse of the USSR, due to
severe political and economic circumstances bottling of water was temporarily
seized.
At present the CARTU Group is the only
company which has the ordinary type of bottling license (which is not
exclusive). The volume of output is low due to promotional and sale problems.
Accordingly, a newcomer with better experience and knowledge of the potential
markets for mineral waters might find itself in a more advantageous position
than CARTU.
Nabeglavi Mineral Water. The Nabeglavi resort is located in the Chokhatauri district, 35 km
south of the district center and 50 km from the railway station of Samtredia,
in the valley of the Gubazeuli river (a tributary of the Supsa river) at the
foothills of the Meskheti ridge and 470-490 m above sea level. The resort is
protected on the south by mountains covered with mixed woods (oak, beech,
hornbeam, fir, and pine).
The major natural curative factors are
mineral waters, which in terms of their chemical composition fall into the
category of acidulous hydrocarbonated sodium waters with a salination of
7.5-8.0 g/l. They also contain solicic acid, bromine and other biologically
active substances. Mineral waters are used for medicinal drinking and
balneologic procedures.
The company “Ckali Margebeli” (Healthy
Water) obtained a license for use of the above mentioned water.
The company uses PET type plastic bottles (1 L, 1.5-L capacity) and
green colored glass bottles (1 L). Presently the company is having problems
with the promotion and sale of the product, accordingly it is not working at
its full capacity and is looking for a foreign partner with professional
knowledge and expertise in the field of mineral waters.
Zvare Mineral Water. The Zvare resort is located in the Orjonikidze district, on the
western slope of the Likhi Ridge (connecting the lesser and great Caucasus
mountains), 600-700 m above sea level, in the valley of the Zvarula-River, 4 km
away from the railway station of Moliti. The nearby mountainsides are mainly covered
with leaf-bearing woods (oak, beech, hornbeam and other species).
Mineral water from Zvare belongs to
the class of acidulous, chloridehydrocarbonate, calcium-sodium waters with a
mineralization of 5-6 g/l. The daily yield of springs is up to 20,000 litres.
Water is considered beneficial for its
health properties, it was traditionally used as a refreshing beverage and, at
the same time recommended for prophylactics of intestine diseases and healing
of metabolism disorders.
The company ZVARE Ltd. obtained an
exclusive license on Zvare water production (its license for abstraction and
use is valid until 2009).
Presently the company does not
operate. It is looking for a foreign partner, who would help it to update the
available facilities, conduct hydro-geological and other professional studies,
construction works, and purchase of transport facilities.
The Georgian law dealing with all
aspects of abstraction, development, exploitation of natural reserves (water)
is enacted. Water regulations are Western oriented and cover the labeling,
packaging and content of bottled water. The only possible change in regulations
could be connected to inevitable transition towards international standards
(ISO). In the first place, changes are expected in the field of assessment and
quality control of water where the former Soviet State Standards (GOST) are
still binding.
The present situation of the water
market in Georgia and possibilities for development of the water business (due
to its unique properties; significant intangible assets, experience of water
production, infrastructure and low cost base), and the general situation of the
international water market and other significant aspects leads one to predict
the possibility of the successful operation of a newcomer in the form of a
strong foreign company.
Nuts. The hazelnuts of Mediterranean origin have been well known in
Georgia since ancient times. Scientists conclude that this species of thick
hazelnuts originates from the Caucasus. Since the mid-1990s farmers started a
mass planting of hazelnuts in Western Georgia, particularly in the Black Sea
coastal region and in Eastern Georgia in the region of Kakheti. It should be
mentioned that since 1998 Georgian nuts have become one of the country’s major
export products.
One of the advantages of Georgia’s agricultural sector is the high
percentage of produce that is organic in nature. The country has not been using
fertilizers and pesticides for some 10 years. Now the country is preparing a
certification process whereby all farmers producing organic food will have
their farms approved and certified as organic. This is expected to generate new
interest in Georgia’s agricultural sector, particularly from markets in the
West where demand for organic food is increasing far beyond supply.
Georgian Tea. Georgia is a northerly tea growing country with a relatively
shorter growing season than other tea producing nations. Tea is grown in West
Georgia in Guria, Samegrelo, Ajara, and Imereti Regions. According to official
statistics for 2001[20][2], these regions possess slightly more than one-quarter of the
country’s total 564,518 hectares of agricultural land.
At independence in 1991, the country had 64,500 hectares of
state-owned tea plantations. Civil war, decline in demand from former markets
in the FSU and the loss of state financing have caused much of the area
formerly planted to tea to be abandoned. As of January 2002, 37,296 hectares of
agriculture land were planted to tea. Tea plantations now occupy 65 percent of
Guria’s total agricultural land, 27 percent of Samegrelo’s total agricultural
land, 58 percent of Ajara’s total agricultural land and 6 percent of Imereti’s
total agricultural land (Table 1). Following the abolition of collective
agriculture, land under tea plantations has mostly been privatized in Guria,
while in Samegrelo, Ajara, and Imereti most of the tea plantations have been
leased out.
Tea leaf production data in the early
1990s is extremely unreliable and so not reported here. It is clear that
production levels have fallen greatly from those of the late 1980s. Production
has generally continued to drift downward since the mid-1990s (Tables 2-3,
Figures 1-2).
According to the Ministry of Agriculture and Food, as of January 1,
2001 there were 146 tea processing enterprises in Georgia (including Abkhazeti)
with a total annual capacity of 722,800 tons. There were 50 tea factories in
Samegrelo, 30 in Guria, 16 in Imereti, and 18 in Ajara. Forty-six of the 50
enterprises in Samegrelo had been privatized, while 30, 11 and 1 enterprises
had been privatized in Guria, Imereti, and Ajara, respectively. These
enterprises mostly use worn-out, obsolete equipment and are in poor financial
condition. Some of these enterprises are reported to have vertically
integrated operations, while others operate on a contractual basis with tea
growers. As might be expected, almost all tea grown appears to be sold to the
factories so that the processing trends follow those of production (Table 4,
Figure 3). The nature of tea also means that the producers are much more
dependent on the processors than are, say, owners of vineyards. Homemade wine
is a reasonable and widely practiced option for primary producers; homemade tea
is not.
During 1994-2001 Georgia was a net
exporter of tea, although it also was a substantial importer and the balance of
trade appears to be turning against Georgia (Table 5, Figure 4). In the early
and mid 1990s the major importers of Georgian tea were in the FSU, but since
1997 geographic coverage has widened as processors developed new markets.
Exports of Georgia tea to US, Germany, and Poland show an increase (Table 6).
Tea remains an important cash crop
among rural households in most of West Georgia. The share of households in
total tealeaf production in 1999 was 43 percent, in 2000, 34 percent, and 93
percent in 2001 (Table 7).
Table 1. Land under Tea Plantations,
2001
Region
|
District
|
Total
Agricultural Land, ha
|
Total Area under
Tea Plantations,
ha
|
Area of Tea
Plantations
Damaged, ha
|
Area of Usable
Plantations,
ha
|
Percent of Plantations
Damaged, %
|
Share of the
Region in total agricultural land of Georgia
|
Area of Land
under Tea as Percent of Total Agricultural Land in Region
|
Ajara |
Regional Total |
9590 |
5,518 |
1,674 |
3,844 |
30% |
1.70 |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samegrelo |
Zugdidi |
10,169 |
5,061 |
654 |
4,407 |
13% |
1.80 |
50 |
|
Martvili |
9,334 |
2,721 |
330 |
2,391 |
12% |
1.65 |
29 |
|
Senaki |
9,699 |
1,202 |
324 |
878 |
27% |
1.72 |
12 |
|
Chkhorotsku |
4,830 |
2,492 |
463 |
2,029 |
19% |
0.86 |
52 |
|
Tsalenjikha |
3,886 |
2,993 |
0 |
2,993 |
0% |
0.69 |
77 |
|
Abasha |
9,654 |
67 |
67 |
0 |
100% |
1.71 |
1 |
|
Khobi |
10,340 |
1,438 |
0 |
1,438 |
0% |
1.83 |
14 |
|
Regional Total |
58524 |
15974 |
1838 |
14136 |
12 |
10.37 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guria |
Ozurgeti |
5,501 |
7,358 |
890 |
6,468 |
12% |
0.97 |
|
|
Lanchkhuti |
7,864 |
1,988 |
445 |
1,543 |
22% |
1.39 |
25 |
|
Chokhatauri |
3,720 |
1,786 |
518 |
1,268 |
29% |
0.66 |
48 |
|
Regional Total |
17085 |
15,974 |
1,838 |
14,136 |
12% |
3.03 |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imereti |
Tskaltubo |
12,025 |
1,141 |
385 |
756 |
34% |
2.13 |
9 |
|
Tkibuli |
3,811 |
1,073 |
200 |
873 |
19% |
0.68 |
28 |
|
Chiatura |
7,323 |
246 |
38 |
208 |
15% |
1.30 |
3 |
|
Vani |
5,335 |
130 |
70 |
60 |
54% |
0.95 |
2 |
|
Zestafoni |
6,127 |
38 |
0 |
38 |
0% |
1.09 |
1 |
|
Terjola |
7,741 |
120 |
39 |
81 |
33% |
1.37 |
2 |
|
Samtredia |
8,103 |
380 |
0 |
380 |
0% |
1.44 |
5 |
|
Khoni |
6,971 |
1,544 |
790 |
754 |
51% |
1.23 |
22 |
|
Regional Total |
73065 |
11,132 |
1,853 |
9,279 |
17% |
12.94 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia, Excluding Abkhazeti
|
TOTAL
|
564,518
|
37,296
|
6,887
|
30,409
|
18%
|
28%
|
7
|
Source: State
Department of Statistics of Georgia, author's estimates. The data for Ozurgeti
clearly contain an error.
Table
2. Annual Tea Leaf Production in Georgia, 1985-2001
(tons)
1985 |
581,200 |
1990 |
501,700 |
1994 |
60,700 |
1995 |
38,500 |
1996 |
34,000 |
1997 |
33,200 |
1998 |
47,200 |
1999 |
60,330 |
2000 |
23,999 |
2001 |
23,000 |
Source: State Department of Statistics of Georgia
Table
3. Tea Leaf Production by Regions, tons
|
Ajara |
Imereti |
Samegrelo |
Guria |
Georgia |
1999 |
7,326 |
6,693 |
28,791 |
17,520 |
60,330 |
2000 |
2,914 |
2,662 |
11,453 |
6,970 |
23,999 |
2001 |
1,924 |
1,050 |
12,518 |
7,508 |
23,000 |
Source: State Department of Statistics of Georgia,
author's estimates
Table 4. Tea Processing, 1994-2001
(tons)
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
First Stage
Processing,
Including
|
13,424.3 |
7,992.0 |
8,895.7 |
9,158.5 |
9,988.9 |
12,897.8 |
4,793.1 |
4,478.6 |
Black Baikhi
|
|
6,732.0 |
5,804.7 |
6,152.6 |
8,360.7 |
11,789.8 |
4,361.9 |
4,219.4 |
Green Baikhi |
|
1,260.0 |
3,091.0 |
3,005.9 |
1,628.2 |
1,108.0 |
431.2 |
259.2 |
Natural Tea,
Including |
4,473.3 |
4,230.0 |
3,747.4 |
7,759.2 |
4,871.0 |
4,509.0 |
3,014.7 |
3,765.1 |
Packed
|
4,003.9 |
1,997.2 |
2,796.2 |
6,420.0 |
2,955.7 |
2,648.4 |
1,904.8 |
2,695.5 |
Green Break |
469.4 |
2,232.8 |
951.2 |
1,339.2 |
1,915.3 |
1,860.6 |
1,109.9 |
1,069.6 |
Granulated Tea |
|
|
|
144.0 |
890.1 |
605.3 |
474.1 |
658.7 |
Liquid Tea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.0 |
58.0 |
Total |
17,897.6 |
12,222.0 |
12,643.1 |
17,061.7 |
15,750.0 |
18,012.1 |
8,320.9 |
8,960.4 |
Source: State
Department of Statistics
Table
5. Georgia’s Tea Trade
|
Imports,
USD |
Exports,
USD |
Coverage
Ratio, % |
1994 |
12439 |
11555495 |
929.0 |
1995 |
157876 |
8380262 |
53.1 |
1996 |
151898 |
16814164 |
110.7 |
1997 |
292190 |
13872490 |
47.5 |
1998 |
434761 |
8918643 |
20.5 |
1999 |
380428 |
11394714 |
30.0 |
2000 |
536702 |
6084280 |
11.3 |
2001 |
544454 |
5792750 |
10.6 |
Source: State
Department of Statistics, author’s estimates
Table
6. Top 10 Export Destinations of Georgian Tea, 1994-2001
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
1 |
RUS |
TKM |
TKM |
RUS |
RUS |
RUS |
RUS |
RUS |
2 |
UKR |
RUS |
RUS |
UZB |
UZB |
UKR |
UKR |
POL |
3 |
BLR |
UKR |
UZB |
TKM |
DEU |
DEU |
DEU |
USA |
4 |
TKM |
KGZ |
TJK |
TJK |
TJK |
TKM |
USA |
DEU |
5 |
UZB |
KAZ |
UKR |
MNG |
SYR |
USA |
MNG |
UKR |
6 |
TJK |
UZB |
KAZ |
UKR |
NLD |
UZB |
UZB |
MNG |
7 |
KAZ |
TJK |
MNG |
POL |
MNG |
MNG |
POL |
UZB |
8 |
TUR |
MNG |
AZE |
KAZ |
BLR |
TJK |
UKR |
TKM |
9 |
MDA |
BLR |
BLR |
BLR |
UKR |
BLR |
KAZ |
IDN |
10 |
POL |
MDA |
KGZ |
KEN |
KAZ |
POL |
TKM |
TJK |
Source: State
Department of Statistics, author’s estimates
Table7.
Household Contribution to Total Production
All
of Georgia excluding Abkhazia
|
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
Production by Households, tons |
25,942 |
8,160 |
21,390 |
Total Production, tons |
60,330 |
23,999 |
23,000 |
Household Share in Total Production,
percent |
0.43% |
0.34% |
0.93% |
Source: State Department of Statistics,
author's estimates
Georgian Foreign Trade
Statistics. In 2002
Georgian foreign trade turnover (registered) totalled US$1045,0 million, that
is 104,6 % of previous year's data for the appropriate period. From this
export is US$325,0 million (101,5% accordingly) and import -US $720,0 million
(106,1%). Negative trade balance of Georgian trade for 2002 stood at US$395,0
million.
The following table shows the trends in Georgia's trade balance:
|
|
Number
of Countries
|
Foreign
Trade Balance - US$ million
|
Negative trade balance |
Year 2001 |
88 |
378,8 |
Year 2002 |
89 |
454,2 |
Positive trade balance |
Year 2001 |
30 |
20,1 |
Year 2002 |
40 |
59,2 |
All trade partners |
Year 2001 |
118 |
358,7 |
Year 2002 |
129 |
395,0 |
|
|
In 2002 Georgia had a negative trade balance with 89
partner countries, with whom the trade gap amounted 454,2 million US Dollars
in comparison with the last year when the same figure was indicated by 378,8
million US $ with 88 partner countries. Georgia had a positive trade balance
of US $ 59,2 million with 40 countries, and in 2001 with 30 countries
(positive balance of US $ 59,2 million).
In 2002 the foreign trade with CIS countries have increased. The 30.6% of the
trade gap covers these countries (29.7% for the same period of the last
year). The foreign trade with CIS countries amounted US $ 4337.4 million in
2002 (the amount increased by 10.6% in comparison with the same period of the
year 2001). CIS countries share 41,9% of Georgia's foreign trade turnover,
among them exports share 48,7% and imports 38,8% (accordingly 39.6%; 45.1%
and 37.0% - in the year 2001).
Trade turnover with Russia reflected US $ 162.8 million and has declined by
1.2% in comparison with the same period of the year 2001, and Georgian
foreign trade turnover with Russia have decreased by 0.9 per cent points from
16.5% to 15.6%.
Georgian
Foreign Trade: 2001-2002 (in US$ millions)
Georgia's Top Ten Export Destinations in 2002 (in US$ millions)
Major export products in 2002 (in US$ millions)
|
Overview of Georgian
Construction Sector. Georgian construction
sector mainly consists of civil, industrial, hydro-technical, transport, and
communication construction projects.
The construction sector was
established long before the formation of the country as a legal state and has
passed from primitive buildings to complicated and sophisticated complexes.
Throughout various stages of the country’s development, buildings and other
construction projects reflect the period in which they were built. For nearly
the last two centuries Georgia was part of the Russian empire and the Soviet
Union, thus, the development of the construction sector was in accordance with
the laws and conditions accepted by Russia and the FSU, i.e. massive
construction of industrial facilities. During that period the construction
sector employed almost 250,000 people and produced construction materials worth
approximately US$1.5 million annually.
After the collapse of the Soviet
Union, the Georgian construction sector ceased development, which was mainly
caused by the political, social and economic conditions of the country (i.e. a
coup, civil war, and armed conflicts in Abkhazia and South Osetia), and also by
non-efficient, highly energy consuming technologies and outdated equipment and
machinery. As a result, almost one hundred percent of the construction
factories and facilities ceased functioning.
During the early ‘90s, when Georgia
became independent and positioned itself towards democracy and integration into
the world economy, the Georgian construction sector realized that it was
totally unprepared to meet the demands and standards of country’s development
phase. The main negative aspects characterizing such non-preparedness
were:
1.
Non-efficient and partially destroyed equipment
and machinery.
2.
Lack of investment in majority spheres of
construction (except private construction).
3.
Weak management of the sector from the
government’s side.
4.
Lack of professional managers and specialists
with knowledge of international principles.
5.
Great need of specialized trainings for the
staff.
6.
Harsh economic condition of scientific,
projecting and architecture institutions.
7.
Import of foreign construction materials and
workforce.
Among other important factors,
considering the importance and crucial character of the construction industry
for the country’s economic development, the Georgian government made several
positive steps towards rehabilitation of the construction industry to create a
favourable investment environment including passing the law on promotion and
guarantee of foreign investment activities, and instituting a process of
restructuring and privatisation. A few years ago the government of Georgia
launched a process of restructuring and privatisation of large Soviet era
construction enterprises. As a result, various non-efficient, illiquid and
monster enterprises have changed their organizational structure and been
converted into small cost and energy efficient, liquid plants. Derived from the
privatisation process the majority of state construction companies have become
private joint stock and limited liability companies. In addition, a huge number
of uncompleted construction sites have been privatised and completed.
Main Indicators of Development
in the Construction Sector. The slight revival and positive trends in the construction
sector have been noticed since 1995 – the period when the Georgian
national currency the Lari (GEL) was introduced.
The table below indicates the main financial flow in the
construction sector during 1995-2002 (first nine months).
Year |
Monetary unit |
Investment in main capital |
Government investment |
Construction and engineering work |
Personal funds of population* |
Foreign investment |
1990 |
Million
Rubles |
2545 |
2233 |
1313 |
93 |
- |
1991 |
2698 |
2435 |
1882 |
140 |
- |
1992 |
12368 |
11521 |
8636 |
532 |
- |
1993 |
Billion
Coupon |
311 |
142 |
270 |
168 |
- |
1994 |
55821 |
30769 |
41758 |
25000 |
- |
1995 |
Million Lari |
127 |
65 |
90 |
19 |
43 |
1996 |
170 |
60 |
91 |
24 |
86 |
1997 |
266 |
67 |
114 |
19 |
180 |
1998 |
512 |
915 |
244 |
16 |
401 |
1999 |
364 |
119 |
248 |
76 |
169 |
2000 |
349 |
141 |
181 |
89 |
119 |
2001 |
362 |
201 |
101 |
33 |
128 |
2002 |
246 |
158 |
86 |
59 |
29 |
Source: Ministry of Construction and Urbanization
* The construction of dwellings in Georgia is mainly based on
up-front deposits made by people who will live there after the construction is
completed.
According to the table investments in main capital from
1995-2002 constitutes 2396 million Georgian Lari (1109 million USD) which
includes: Government investment – 906 million GEL (419 million USD) – 37.8%,
personal funds of the population – 335 million GEL (155 million USD) – 14.0%,
foreign investment – 1155 million GEL (534 million USD) – (48.2%). Derived from
this data we can state that investment in main capital shows a trend toward a
positive increase (+2.7) from 1995-2001 compared to 1995. In addition, the
increase in foreign investment is quite noticeable. This was mainly due to the
construction of the oil pipeline and Supsa oil terminal in 1998.
In 2002 the positive developments in the construction sector
continue to accelerate, resulting in construction of 545 buildings, among
theses are the construction of a new Marriott hotel, 62 stores, 38 gas
stations, and 12 food outlets (all in Tbilisi).
Market demand (Construction
Materials). Even though
several local construction material manufacturing plants have been restructured
and rehabilitated, the goods manufactured by them do not have a high demand among Georgian customers. Mainly this is due to low
quality and narrow assortment. The only Georgian made product of comparatively
good quality is cement, produced by the Rustavcement and Kaspicement companies.
This situation represents a good opportunity for U.S.
firms to invest in and/or upgrade local building materials manufacturing
plants. Presently, product imported from Turkey, Dubai, Iran and Russia
occupies almost 95% of the Georgian building materials market. Even though they
are perceived to be of a lower quality, the majority
of people still buy them because of the low price. Nevertheless, another
Georgian customer segment, the high income family, still prefers building
materials made in the U.S. or Europe, due to the high quality and regardless of the higher price.
The following imported materials are in the highest demand on
the Georgian market:
·
Ceramic
Products (tile, mats)
·
Insulated American style windows, doors.
·
Various colored wood and flooring materials.
·
Heat, ventilation, air conditioning systems.
·
Roofing materials
·
Varnish paints
·
Plastic tubes for water communication
·
Wallpapers
·
Lights and bulbs
·
Vinyl sidings
Due to the growing wave of
construction, a large market share still remains unoccupied and is ready for
new companies and potential investors. The construction sector will play an
essential and important role in Georgia’s further economic development and
integration into the world economy.
4. Business
Enterprise register. Registration of an enterprise is to be carried out by the Court by
making due records in the Enterprise Register. The information concerning the
registration is to be recorded into the Register Card. The Register Card
specimens are presented below:
Registration
card (sample) for Limited Liability Companies (LLC)
Ser.
No.
|
Date
|
Subject
of activity and aggregate capital of the society
|
Name,
date and place of birth, occupation, address of partners
|
Name,
date and place of birth, occupation, address of directors
|
Name,
date and place of birth, occupation of members of the supervisory council (if
any)
|
Representation
of directors
|
Trade
representatives (procurators)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registration
card (sample) for Joint Stock Companies (JSC)
Ser.
No.
|
Date
|
Subject
of activity and capital
|
Tapes
of shares; sharing
|
Name,
date and place of birth, occupation, address of directors
|
Name,
date and place of birth, occupation address of members of the supervisory
council
|
Representation
of directors
|
Trade
representatives (procurators)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Law on Entrepreneurs provides that
data on newly registered companies should be published in the official
newspaper. The Law also guarantees information on any company entered into the
enterprise register held by courts be available to the public. Any person
should be able to view the records and obtain extracts from the registration
file.
Procedure for registering (establishing) an enterprise. Figure 4.1.1.1 provides an outline of the sequence of the procedures
to register and establish a business in Georgia.
Figure
4.1.1.1 Business Registration Procedures
* Statistical Department registration and
stamp approval. Although the law no longer requires these procedures, they are
still being followed by some entities and required by certain authorities due
to uncertainty, lack of information, and corruption.
In practice, the entire registration
process reportedly takes 2 to 3 weeks. However, it is possible to register a
company within few days by means of unofficial payments.
Registration with the Local
Court. In accordance with the procedures set
forth in the Law on Entrepreneurs, all legal businesses are required to
register at the local court that has jurisdiction over the legal address of the
enterprise. Further, all registered companies are required to officially record
any changes in their registration data.
In order to register an LLC, the
following documents must be submitted to a local court:
(1) Application form signed by the founders. Application form
must include:
Firm name (firm);
Organizational and legal form;
Location (legal address);
Subject of the activity;
Information on the start and end of
the fiscal year;
For each founder - the family name,
first name, date and place of birth, occupation and place of residence of the
entrepreneur;
Representative authorities.
(2) Charter (five copies)
(3) Minutes of the foundation meeting
(4) Founder’s decision to set up the company
(5) Director’s sample of signature
(6) Document confirming the legal address of
the company (this may be a lease agreement, a certificate issued by manager of
the company that subleases the office space, or notarised consent of the owner
of a flat)
(7) Copy of the company founder’s passport, if
the founder is an individual person; or a registration certificate (e.g.,
extract from the register of enterprises), if the founder is a legal entity. If
the founder is a Georgian company, the certificate of the local court should be
less than 1 week old.
(8) The amount of the authorized equity
capital and the documents confirming payment of at least 50 percent of the
equity capital (a certificate from the bank or, for in-kind contributions, an
auditor’s assessment of its value)
(9) A document confirming payment of the registration fee.
To register a JSC, the decision of the
supervisory board to appoint directors is required in addition to the
above-listed documents.
The following supporting documents are required to register a branch
or a representative office:
(1) Charter of the foreign company
(2) Decision of the foreign company to set up the
representative office
(3) Document certifying the solvency of the foreign investor
(e.g., a letter from a foreign bank or a foreign tax service)
(4) Bylaws of the representative office.
All registration documents must be
submitted in the Georgian language and must be notarized. Foreign documents
must be certified by an apostille[21] or undergo a procedure of legalization and be translated by a
certified translator.
According to the law, the courts are
required to process registration applications within 7 days. Registration of
amendments to a charter or any other changes to entries are to be processed
within 7 days. No official expedited service is available, but reportedly
registration can be performed in 1 day if the court registrar has the time and
if an additional unofficial payment is made (roughly 100–400 GEL). Box II.2
provides a summary of the official registration fees.
A company receives a court resolution
when the company is registered. The law on entrepreneurs provides automatic
registration by default if the court fails to respond within 7 days.
If a company changes its legal address
to an address that falls within the jurisdiction of another local court, the
company is not required to change its court registration and its registration
file stays at the initial court of registration. However, the company must
re-register with the local tax office that has jurisdiction over the new legal
address.
Registration Fees. Registration fees are determined by the company’s legal form. The
court stamp duty is currently $180 to register a JSC, $80 to register a LLC,
$90 to register a branch of a JSC, and $40 to register a branch of a LLC. Fees
for registering changes to entries are half of the fee for registering the
respective type of company (i.e. $40 to register changes for an LLC and $90 for
a JSC).
All the payments charged for
notarization of an enterprise’s charter are different in each case and depend
on the amount of the authorized capital. The percentage of the amount to be
paid is reduced with the increase of the authorized capital and ranges from 3
to 0.05 per cent of the authorized capital. The charge must not be less than
GEL 25 and must not be more than GEL 50. It should be noted that a 20% VAT is
added to the sum charged for the notarization.
Peripheral services can be provided by
private lawyers and related professionals at additional cost. Lawyer charge in
the range of $300-600 to draft a company’s charter and to provide advice. A
notary public typically charges about $30 to certify the documents and about $2
per page to certify copies of the documents.
Taxation Department Registration. In accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers Decree 899 (December
31, 1994), within 10 days of completing the company registration process, an
investor must register with the local office of the taxation department that
has jurisdiction over the legal company address. This registration requirement
applies to all tax types except the value-added tax (VAT). VAT registration is
required for all firms with total taxable transactions greater than GEL 24,000.
A taxpayer registration application
package should contain the following documents:
(1) Taxpayer registration form (4 copies)
(2) Court resolution showing company registration (notarised
copy)
(3) Charter (original or notarised copy)
(4) Minutes of the foundation meeting
(original or notarised copy)
(5) Decision to set up the company (original
or notarised copy)
(6) Director’s sample of signature (notarised)
(7) Document confirming the legal address of
the company (original or notarised copy).
In accordance with Decree 899, the
Taxation Department is required to issue a taxpayer registration certificate
within 10 working days. The compliance with the 10-day limit depends on whether
or not operations at local taxation offices are computerized. There is no fee
for taxpayer registration.
Taxpayers are assigned a 9-digit
taxpayer identification number (TIN). The first digit specifies the taxpayer
type (1 is for an individual person, 2 is for a legal entity), the next 7
digits are sequential numbers (each local tax office has its own block of
7-digit sequential numbers), and the last digit is a control digit. There is no
relation between a court registration number and a TIN.
If a company changes its legal address, opens
a branch, changes bank accounts, or makes any other changes that require
registration at the enterprise register, then the investor is required to
notify the tax department within 10 days of the change.
As of June 2001, sole proprietorships
are no longer required to register with the courts. They need only to register
with the relevant local taxation office.
If a company’s total taxable
transactions over the previous 12 months equal or exceed 24,000 GEL, the
company is required to register for VAT within 1 month of the change in tax
liability status. A separate VAT registration certificate is issued.
Stamp Approval. In accordance with the amendments to the Law on Entrepreneurs
(effective June 1, 2001), company stamps are no longer required, and state
institutions have been explicitly prohibited from requiring a company to
present a stamp for any purpose. Information regarding this change in the law
apparently has not been widely disseminated because in July 2001, many
companies and lawyers still complied with the old requirements for company
stamps. Further, it appears that the police department continues to issue stamp
approvals (at a fee of 10 GEL) despite the change in the law.
Department for Statistics
Registration. Amendments to the Law on
Entrepreneurs and the Administrative Code have eliminated the requirement that
a business must register with the Department of Statistics. Under the new
regulations, this requirement has been replaced by a notification process
between the courts and the Department of Statistics. The new regulations may be
summarized as follows:
In accordance with the Law on
Entrepreneurs,[22] the courts are required to send copies of the court business
registration resolutions to the Statistical Department on a monthly basis. This
information should be submitted by the 5th day of every month.
On June 19, 2001, parliament amended
the Law on Entrepreneurs and abolished the provision that the courts must
assign tax and statistics codes when a company has registered with the relevant
bodies.
Amendments[23] to the Administrative Code in July 2001 have removed the provision
that companies must provide a statistical code in order to open a commercial
bank account.
However, in practice, companies
throughout Georgia still go to the central bureau of the statistical department
in Tbilisi to register in order to comply with the previous provisions of the
law.
Public Availability of Information. Company registration data are recorded in the registration card as
approved under the law (see in the above). The same format is used to respond
to requests for company registration information. The following information is
required to complete a registration card:
·
Name of the local court
·
Court registration number
·
Company name
·
Address
·
Activities
·
Equity capital
·
Names of partner(s), their occupations, and
addresses
·
Names of director(s), their occupations, and
addresses
·
Members of the supervisory board, their
occupations, and addresses (if a supervisory board was established)
·
Representation powers of director(s)
·
Trade representative (procurator)
·
Legal status
·
Date of registration
·
Remarks
As mentioned above, a company may be
registered in any one of 66 local courts throughout Georgia.
General. The law of
Georgia on "Licensing of Entrepreneurial Activity" adopted on 14 May,
1999 defines those business activities which can be carried out only by
licenses issued by the corresponding state agencies.
The law lists those types of business activities about which
corresponding state bodies must be notified. The law does not cover
export-import relations, environmental control and utilization of natural
resources, electric power, oil and natural gas, communication and post
services, where licensing procedures are regulated by special legal acts.
Activities to be Licensed and
Licensing Agencies. The types of
business activities that require obtaining a license and the respective state
licensing agencies are as follows:
a)
Insurance activities
and intermediary (agency) services in the field of insurance – Insurance State
Supervision Service of Georgia;
b)
Banking activities,
activities of foreign currency exchange points – National Bank of Georgia;
c)
Production, repair of
and trading with arms and ammunition – Ministry of Justice of Georgia (within
the limits defined by National Security Council of Georgia);
d)
Air transportation of
passengers and goods or/and carrying out aviation related work at the territory
of Georgia, maritime transportation and hauling – Ministry of Transport and
Communications of Georgia;
e)
Activities of the
regulated participants of the securities market (brokerage companies, brokers,
stock exchanges, central securities depositary and securities registrars) –
Ministry of Finance of Georgia;
f)
Organizing lotteries
and other money-making games – Ministry of Finance of Georgia;
g)
Production of medicines
and substances that are subject to special control, medicines used in
veterinary, activities of health care organizations – Ministry of Labor, Health
and Social Protection;
h)
Activities of
diagnostic centers for technical examination of motor vehicles –Ministry of
Internal Affairs of Georgia;
i)
Design - construction
works – Ministry of Urbanization and Construction of Georgia (in the cases
defined by the law);
j)
Activities of auditing
firms – Parliamentary Council on Audit Activity of Georgia;
k)
Activities of private
educational institutions – Ministry of Education of Georgia;
l)
Production and repair
of metrological and measurement equipment – Department of Standardization,
Metrology and Certification of Georgia;
m)
Production of food
products (including child's food products) and tobacco - Ministry of
Agriculture and Food of Georgia.
Notification about Carrying Out
Activities. The following fields of activities are subject for compulsory
notification of the relevant state
agencies as defined in this paragraph:
a)
Activities related to
precious metals, precious stones and their products – Testing Supervisory
Inspection of Ministry of Finance of Georgia;
b)
Aero photographing of
the country's territory, creating state geodesic network, works related to the
publication of maps and plans – State Department of Geodesy and Cartography;
c)
Activities related to
job finding services (including abroad) - Ministry of Labor, Health and Social
Protection;
d)
Geologic activities -
State Department of Geology;
e)
Transportation of
passengers by a minicab – Relevant Department of local government
(self-government) authorities;
f)
Activities of public
dining halls, which can simultaneously accommodate 25 persons or more -
Relevant Department of local government (self-government) authorities.
The notification is made as a statement, which
includes:
a)
For an individual –
data about the identification card of a citizen of Georgia, registration into
enterprise register, occupation, home address);
b)
For a legal entity -
the company's name, legal status, location (legal address), name of authorized
representative;
c)
Indication about the
type of activity and the place, where the person carries out this activity.
Within 15 days from starting the activity, a person is
required to notify about starting this activity the relevant agency, which is
obliged to issue a document certifying the receipt of such notification within
3 days after receiving the notification.
The Documentation that has to be Submitted for
Obtaining a License.
A license seeker submits a
written application about obtaining the license to a licensing agency. The
application about obtaining the license should include:
For an
individual:
a)
First name, last name, date and place of birth
b)
Registration data from the registry
c)
Registration number
d)
Occupation
e)
Work and home addresses
f)
Type of license requested
g)
Document proving the payment of license fee
For a legal entity:
a)
Company name
b)
Organizational-legal status
c)
Legal address
d)
First and last names of company representative
e)
Type of license requested
f)
Proof of payment for license fee
Licensing Fee. A
license seeker pays a licensing fee for issuing a license certificate. The
amount of a licensing fee, the procedure of its payment into the budget and
claiming back is defined in "Law of Georgia on Licensing Fees". For
issuing a copy of a license, the license holder covers the cost of making a
copy of the license.
Duration of a License. A license is issued for an indefinite period of
time. A license holder carries out the activity defined by the license since
the date of making decision by the licensing agency about issuing the license.
The transfer of a license to another person is prohibited.
License Register and its Maintenance. There are two types of license register: a) Departmental
license register; and b) The state license register. A licensing agency enters
the data related to a license into a departmental license register within 3
days after making the decision about issuing a license. The following data is
recorded into a departmental license register:
For an
individual:
a)
Data about the holder of a license (first name,
last name)
b)
Home address
c)
The type (types) of licensed activities
d)
The number of a license and the date of issue
e)
Data about suspending, resuming, revoking a
license or issuing a copy of the license
For a legal entity:
a)
Data about the holder of a license (the
company's name)
b)
The company's legal status
c)
The data of the state registration
d)
Location (legal address)
e)
The data about making amendments into the
company's name, legal status and location (legal address), as well as about the
reorganization of the company
f)
The type (types) of licensed activities
g)
The number of a license and the date of issue
f)
Data about suspending, resuming, revoking a
license or issuing a copy of the license
First,
we will analyse the aggregate figures concerning all Joint Stock Companies
(JSC) traded at Georgian Stock Exchange (GSE) and then will present the data on
individual enterprises.
Market Capitalization. The figures
describing the market capitalization of all Joint Stock Companies traded at GSE
are presented in Table 4.1.1.1:
Table
4.1.1.1 Market Capitalization of all JSCs
Year
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
Market Capitalization (GEL)
|
66,799,785 |
184,017,886 |
218,402,008 |
Source: GSE
|
The
more useful benchmark for judging the market performance of the private
companies usually is the ratio of the market capitalization over the Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) of that country. Figure 4.1.1.1 shows the values of this
ratio for Georgia and also for other Eastern European (mainly former Soviet
Block) countries, whose economies are in transition mode from the command
economy to a market driven system likewise Georgia. It can be seen from this
Figure that Georgian stock market is rather underdeveloped in comparison to
other Eastern European countries, not to speak about the Western European
Countries and the USA, which have much higher values of this ratio.
Fig.
4.1.1.1. Market Capitalization as % of GDP for Eastern European Countries,
including Georgia
It
is interesting to note that about 82.8% of the total market capitalization is
formed by only 10 companies. The remaining 278 companies that are admitted for
trading at the GSE constitute to only about 17.2% of the total market
capitalization. This is shown in Fig. 4.1.1.2:
Fig.
4.1.1.2 Market Capitalization of 10 Leading Georgian Joint Stock Companies
Volume and Value of Trades. The
figures given in Table 4.1.1.2 reflect the combined volume and value of trades
of all Joint Stock Companies conducted at GSE since its inception to date.
Table
4.1.1.2 Volume & Value of Trades at GSE
Year
|
2000*
|
2001
|
2002
|
2003**
|
Volume of Trades (Shares)
|
4,354,640 |
10,862,784 |
11,418,196 |
5,103,555 |
Value of Trades (GEL)
|
5,892,326 |
13,077,244 |
8,401,206 |
1,398,781 |
* Apr. – Dec.
2000; ** Jan. – Oct. 2003.
Source: GSE
|
Value Turnover. The value turnover is calculated by dividing the annual value of
trades over the total market capitalization in that year. This is shown in
Table 4.1.1.3 for years 2001 and 2002:
Year
|
2001
|
2002
|
Value of Trades (GEL)
|
13,077,244 |
8,401,206 |
Market Capitalization (GEL)
|
184,017,886 |
218,402,008 |
Value Turnover
|
7.11% |
3.85% |
Source: GSE
|
Table
4.1.1.3 Value Turnover at GSE
The large part of the total value of
trades comes on the trading of the securities of 10 leading companies mentioned
in the above. This is shown in Fig. 4.1.1.3:
Fig.
4.1.1.3 Value of Trades of 10 Leading Georgian Companies
Liquidity.
All the factors considered in the previous paragraphs, i.e. Low Market Capitalization, low Volume and Value of Trades, and low
Value Turnover, all indicate that there is little (or even no) liquidity at the
GSE.
Indeed, out of 282 companies, whose shares are currently admitted for trading
at the GSE, the shares of only 93 companies (i.e. 33%) were traded in 2002. The
shares of the remaining companies were not traded during the year at all. This is shown in Figure 4.1.1.4:
Fig. 4.1.1.4 Number of Admitted Companies Actually Traded in 2002
Even those companies, whose
shares have been traded in the past, do not satisfy
the requirements for getting listed at the GSE. The main listing criteria are:
a) Company should be functioning for more than 3 years; b) Equity Capital of a
company should be greater than 100,000 USD; and c) Company should be profitable for 2 years during the last 3-year
period (GSE, 2003). Out of 282 companies, only 2 companies were listed at the
GSE in 2001, while only 1 company has been left listed in 2002, after the GSE
removed 1 company from the list. Furthermore, the
total number of trades and therefore an average number of trades per trading
session are also extremely low, as shown in Tab. 4.1.1.4:
Table
4.1.1.4 Average Number of Trades per Trading Session
Year
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
Total Number of Trades
|
601 |
1,591 |
1,343 |
Number of Trading Sessions
|
80 |
102 |
102 |
Average Number of Trades per Session*
|
8 |
16 |
13 |
* Figures are
Rounded to the Nearest Integer
Source: GSE
|
In total, 309 trading sessions have
been held during 2000 – 2003 and 3780 trades have been executed during this
period. It then follows, that average number of trades per trading session
(i.e. per day) is equal to 12. This figure gives some idea about the number of buyers
and sellers participating in trades each
day. Also note that the total number of the securities admitted for trading at
the GSE is equal to 282. All these means that there are virtually no liquid
shares at the GSE.
Composite Index. The poor performance of the GSE in
terms of all the above-mentioned market indicators indicate that the nature of
the composite index would be rather unreliable and would not reflect the true
picture of market performance. One solution to the problem is to select only
the leading companies (blue-chip companies) and construct the index for these
companies. Indeed, such approach is employed by Georgian Investment Bank Galt
& Taggart (G&T) Securities LLC, which publishes so-called G&T
Blue-Chip Index. This is shown in Fig. 4.1.1.5:
Fig. 4.1.1.5 G&T Blue-Chip Index (GEL), 2002
The problems facing GSE. Below is the problem tree describing
the set of problems currently facing GSE:
General recommendations for
improving the performance of GSE. The fact
that at present there is no sound and liquid capital
market in Georgia can be attributed to two fundamental problems: (I) A low
potential of the capital market in Georgia; and (II) A high unrealized
potential of Georgian capital market. The government of Georgia (GoG)
should undertake both, long-term and short-to-medium term measures in order to
improve the performance of Georgian Stock Exchange (GSE).
(I) It is suggested that the potential
of the capital market in Georgia could be increased by means of:
Long-term
goals:
Increasing the rate of country's
economic growth;
Reducing the size of the shadow
economy;
Attracting higher Foreign Direct
Investments (FDI).
short-to-medium term goals:
Conducting the 2nd round of
the privatization through GSE by involving investment funds into the
privatization process;
Including the majority of leading
Georgian companies into the listing of the securities traded at GSE.
(II) A high unrealized potential of
Georgian capital market can be explained by low
confidence (trust) amongst the investors towards the stock market, which in
turn is the result of the problems existing in terms of protecting the
shareholders' rights. In order to solve the latter problem, there is a need:
(i) to improve the corporate governance practice, and (ii) to ensure
the fairness of the market. These mainly are the goals that can be achieved
in short-to-medium term.
The measures needed to improve the
corporate governance practice in Georgia include:
To simplify the tax system;
To adopt the International
Standards on Auditing (ISA) into law;
To enforce the International
Accounting Standards (IAS).
These measures are designed to remove the incentives to pay bribes for the purposes of hiding profits and avoiding paying taxes, which would result in lower levels of corruption in tax
administrations and increased transparency of corporate disclosure.
Another measure to improve the corporate governance practice in Georgia is:
To conduct an educational campaign
amongst shareholders, company directors and the members
of supervisory boards.
The objective of the educational campaign is to lessen the entrenched culture of abusive self-dealing and to
give to shareholders sufficient knowledge about their rights. The entrenched
culture of abusive self-dealing can also be alleviated by means of putting in
place effective regulations and institutions for controlling the self-dealing.
All these should lead to regular shareholder meetings and increase the role of the
supervisory boards in giving the strategic direction to companies.
Another important factor for
improving the corporate governance practice in Georgia is to have an active
market for corporate control. Namely, there is a need:
To put in place an adequate
legislation for investor protection. More specifically, to introduce the
investment compensation schemes, strengthen the bankruptcy system and adopt the
rules for takeovers;
To adopt the legislation regulating
the financial intermediaries (such as private pension
funds and mutual funds), which at present are absent in
Georgia.
Properly functioning financial intermediaries would act as large
domestic institutional investors and ensure that large volumes of capital
resources are directed to the market. This, in turn, would facilitate the
competition in the financial market and lead to an active market for corporate
control.
The measures needed to ensure the
fairness of the market include:
To Enforce a trading transparency;
To deter an unfair trading.
The last two objectives can be reached by means of ensuring an
effective functioning of the National Securities Commission of Georgia (NSCG),
which should be capable of ensuring an effective enforcement of the securities
regulations. More specifically:
The NSCG should have an adequate
Inspection, Investigation and Enforcement power, including the criminal
prosecution authority;
The Government of Georgia (GoG) should
increase the budgetary support of the NSCG to ensure a proper functioning of
the agency;
The NSCG should be more accountable to
GoG for its activities regarding the regulation of Georgian capital market;
The NSCG should develop a program to
supervise the activities of Self‑Regulatory Organizations (SROs); and
The NSCG has to develop a code of
ethics for its staff.
Another measure needed to ensure the
fairness of the market is:
To enforce adequately the rights of
the shareholders, which should be done through the improved court system.
In order to improve Georgian court system, it is important to
conduct training of judges in the topics concerning the corporate law and
operation of the securities market
All the above-described measures are
designed to achieve in future a
sound and liquid capital market in Georgia.
Specific recommendations for
improving the performance of GSE. More specific
recommendations, together with the objectives to be
achieved, performance indicators, responsible agencies, duration, etc., are
presented in the next page. Objectives given in parenthesis correspond to the
Problem Tree given in the above:
Recommendations
|
Objectives to be Achieved
|
Performance Indicators
|
Responsible Agencies
|
Duration
|
Comment
|
· Conduct the 2nd round of the
privatization process through GSE;
· Involve the Investment Funds into the
privatization process.
|
· Privatization process is improved
(Objective 13);
· Potential of the capital market is
increased (Objective 2).
|
· The companies included in the
privatization list of the 2nd round should be privatized through
GSE;
· A number of (at least 3-5) Investment
Funds take part into the privatization process.
|
DSPM
NSCG
GSE
|
· 1-2 years |
· With the technical assistance of the WB. |
· About 80% of the leading Georgian
companies, which currently are not traded at GSE, have to be included into
the list of the securities traded at GSE;
· Government of Georgia (GoG) must
introduce some incentives (e.g. simplified tax regime) for those corporations
that decide to be listed at GSE.
|
· Majority of leading companies are traded
at GSE (Objective 4);
· Potential of the capital market is
increased (Objective 2).
|
· Majority of leading Georgian companies
are listed at GSE;
· Simplified tax regime is introduced for
the corporations traded at GSE.
|
PoG
MoF
NSCG
GSE
|
· 1-2 years |
· With the technical assistance of the WB |
· Prepare and adopt the amendments into the
Tax Code of Georgia (TCG);
· Conduct the tax administration reform.
·
|
· The tax system is simplified (Objective
7);
· There is an adequate tax code (Objective
6);
· Incentives for paying bribes/Hiding
profits are reduced (Objective 11);
· The level of corruption is reduced
(Objective 10);
· Transparency of corporate disclosure is
increased (Objective 12);
· Reliability of financial disclosure is
increased (Objective 28);
· Corporate governance practice is improved
(Objective 17).
|
· Business-friendly tax code is in place;
· Simplified tax regime for securities and
corporations are established;
· No frequent changes into the tax code are
made;
· Collection of taxes is increased;
· Companies file more reliable information
about their profits;
· Companies increase the transparency and
quality of corporate disclosure.
|
PoG
MoF
STD
|
· 6 months
· Ongoing
|
· With the technical assistance of the WB;
· In consultations with NSCG.
|
· Make amendments into Law on Audit
Activity (LAA) to adopt International Standards on Auditing (ISA);
· Ministry of Finances (MoF), together with
Parliamentary Council on Audit Activity (PCAA), requires audit companies to
conduct audits in compliance with the International Standards on Auditing
(ISA).
|
· ISA is adopted into the law
(Objective 34);
· There are adequate auditing standards
(Objective 33);
· Incentives for paying bribes/Hiding
profits are reduced (Objective 11);
· The level of corruption is reduced
(Objective 10);
· Transparency of corporate disclosure is
increased (Objective 12);
· Reliability of financial disclosure is
increased (Objective 28);
· Corporate governance practice is improved
(Objective 17).
|
· International Standards on Auditing is
adopted into law;
· Audits are conducted in compliance with
International Standards on Auditing;
· Companies file more reliable information
about their profits;
· Companies increase the transparency and
quality of corporate disclosure.
|
PoG
PCAA
MoF
|
· 6 months
· Ongoing
|
· With the technical assistance of the WB;
· In consultations with NSCG and GSIA.
|
· National Securities commission of Georgia
(NSCG) requires reporting companies to prepare their financial accounts in
compliance with the International Accounting Standards (IAS). |
· IAS is enforced (Objective 9);
· There are adequate accounting standards
(Objective 8);
· Incentives for paying bribes/Hiding
profits are reduced (Objective 11);
· The level of corruption is reduced
(Objective 10);
· Transparency of corporate disclosure is
increased (Objective 12);
· Reliability of financial disclosure is
increased (Objective 28);
· Corporate governance practice is improved
(Objective 17).
|
· Reporting companies prepare their
financial accounts in compliance with the International Accounting Standards;
· Companies file more reliable information
about their profits;
· Companies increase the transparency and
quality of corporate disclosure.
|
NSCG
MoF
|
· 3 months
· Ongoing
|
· In consultations with GSIA. |
· National Anti-Corruption Bureau of
Georgia (NACB) conducts the assessment of the activities carried out by the
tax administrations. |
· The level of corruption is reduced
(Objective 10);
· Transparency of corporate disclosure is
increased (Objective 12);
· Reliability of financial disclosure is
increased (Objective 28);
· Corporate governance practice is improved
(Objective 17).
|
· Index of corruption is lowered;
· Companies file more reliable information
about their profits;
· Companies increase the transparency and
quality of corporate disclosure.
|
NACB |
· Ongoing |
· With the technical assistance of the WB. |
· Georgian Securities Industry Association
(GSIA) should conduct training courses, seminars, workshops, etc. amongst
shareholders, company directors and members of supervisory boards on the best
practices of corporate governance;
· NSCG enforces the corporate governance standards.
|
· Educational campaign is conducted
(Objective 27);
· Shareholders have sufficient knowledge
about their rights (Objective 26);
· Entrenched culture of abusive
self-dealing is lessened (Objective 16);
· Shareholders' meetings are held regularly
(Objective 29);
· The role of supervisory boards is
increased (Objective 35);
· Corporate governance practice is improved
(Objective 17).
|
· Majority of company directors and members of supervisory boards,
as well as interested shareholders take part in training courses;
· NSCG conduct quarterly/annual audits of
JSCs;
· Shareholders' meetings are held annually;
· Supervisory boards' meetings are held on a quarterly basis.
|
NSCG
GSIA
|
· 1 year
· Ongoing
|
· With the financial and technical
assistance of the USAID. |
· Prepare and adopt the regulations for
Pension Funds;
· Prepare and adopt the regulations for
Mutual Funds.
|
· Legislation for financial intermediaries
is adopted (Objective 23);
· Financial intermediaries are
well-developed (Objective 21);
· Large domestic institutional investors
are present at GSE (Objective 20);
· Larger volumes of capital resources are
directed to GSE (Objective 18);
· There is a competition at GSE (Objective 22);
· There is a strong market for corporate
control (Objective 30).
|
· Private Pension Funds start functioning
in the country;
· Mutual Funds start functioning in the
country;
· Large domestic institutional
investors take part in trading at GSE;
· Volume of trades at GSE is increased
substantially;
· Number of participants in trading at GSE
is increased;
· Investment funds take active role in the
work of supervisory boards/shareholders meetings.
|
PoG
MoF
NSCG
GSE
|
· 1 year |
· With the technical assistance of the WB. |
· Adopt the investment compensation
schemes;
· Strengthen the bankruptcy system;
· Adopt the rules for takeovers.
|
· Adequate legislation for investor
protection is adopted (Objective 24);
· Financial intermediaries are
well-developed (Objective 21);
· Large domestic institutional investors
are present at GSE (Objective 20);
· Larger volumes of capital resources are
directed to GSE (Objective 18);
· There is a competition at GSE (Objective 22);
· There is a strong market for corporate
control (Objective 30).
|
· Investment compensation schemes are in
place;
· Regulations for the bankruptcy system are in place;
· Rules for takeovers are in place;
· Large domestic institutional
investors take part in trading at GSE;
· Volume of trades at GSE is increased
substantially;
· Number of participants in trading at GSE
is increased;
· Investment funds take active role in the
work of supervisory boards/shareholders meetings.
|
MoF
NSCG
GSE
|
· 1 year |
· With the technical assistance of the WB. |
· Assign an adequate Inspection,
Investigation and Enforcement power, including the criminal prosecution
authority to the National Securities Commission of Georgia (NSCG);
· Increase the budgetary support of the
NSCG;
· Make the NSCG accountable to the
President of Georgia;
· Develop the code of ethics for NSCG;
· Develop the program to supervise Self‑Regulatory
Organizations (SROs);
· NSCG installs the market surveillance and
stock watch system.
|
· Power of the NSCG is increased (Objective
40);
· Budgetary support of the NSCG is
increased (Objective 37);
· Accountability of the NSCG is increased
(Objective 36);
· Code of ethics for the NSCG staff is
developed (Objective 38);
· Program to supervise Self‑
Regulatory Organizations (SROs) is developed (Objective 39);
· The NSCG does function in an effective
manner (Objective 39);
· Regulations are enforced in an effective
manner (Objective 42);
· Trading transparency is enforced
(Objective 43);
· Unfair trading is deterred (Objective
44);
· Fairness of Market is ensured
(Objective 45).
|
· NSCG has the criminal prosecution
authority;
· Budget allocations to NSCG is increased;
· Rules are in place that make the NSCG
accountable to the President of Georgia;
· The code of ethics for NSCG is in place;
· The program to supervise SROs is in
place;
· Trades are conducted in a transparent
manner/information is easily available;
· Facts of unfair trading are detected
and/or deterred.
|
PoG
NSCG
GSE
|
· 6 months – 1 year |
· In consultation with the IOSCO. |
· Special training courses are conducted for the judges
dealing with corporate disputes/ protection of shareholders rights. |
· Georgian court system is improved
(Objective 32);
· Shareholders rights are enforced
adequately (Objective 31);
· Fairness of Market is ensured
(Objective 45).
|
· Judges have sufficient knowledge of
corporate/securities laws;
· Number of complaints against judges is
reduced.
|
MoJ
NSCG
GSIA
|
· 6 months |
|
Kazbegi JSC
|
Sector:
|
Consumer Goods
|
GSE Ticker:
|
KAZB
|
Summary Information:
· Kazbegi JSC is the leading Georgian
brewery and producer of non-alcoholic drinks, coffee, cigarettes, etc.;
· Last year the company reported an
impressive 75% increase in annual sales to GEL 9.4 mln., although the sales
figure fell somewhat behind the management's ambitious estimate of GEL 12
mln.;
· Net profit of the company increased by
18% to GEL 1.4 mln., translating into EPS of GEL 0.51;
· Capital expenditures amounted to GEL 1.7
mln. that were mainly used for modernizing the existing facilities;
· The company's assets grew by 21% over the
year to reach GEL 7.7 mln.;
· The company's equity increased by 25% and
amounted to GEL 5.6 mln.;
· The company continues to pay dividends,
which amounted to GEL 240 thousand or GEL 0.086 per share. At current prices
dividend yield amounts to 3%.
|
Source: Galt
& Taggart
|
Kazbegi JSC - Summary
|
Current Price (GEL)
|
2.50 |
Year High (GEL)
|
2.50 |
Year Low (GEL)
|
2.50 |
Market Capitalization (GEL mln.)
|
7.0 |
Shares Outstanding (mln.)
|
2.8 |
Free Float (%)
|
42.7 |
Free Float (GEL mln.)
|
3.0 |
Source: Galt
& Taggart
|
Kazbegi JSC – Key Figures (IAS)
|
Year Ending
December 31 |
2001
|
2002
|
Net Sales (GEL mln.)
|
5.4 |
9.4 |
Net Income (GEL mln.)
|
1.2 |
1.4 |
EPS (GEL)
|
0.43 |
0.51 |
Total Assets (GEL mln.)
|
6.3 |
7.7 |
Equity/Assets (%)
|
70.8 |
73.2 |
ROA (%)
|
19.0 |
18.2 |
ROE (%)
|
26.8 |
24.9 |
Book Value per Share (GEL)
|
1.60 |
2.00 |
P/E
|
5.77 |
4.91 |
P/BV
|
1.57 |
1.25 |
Sources:
Kazbegi, Galt & Taggart
|
Kazbegi JSC – Valuation (Refer to Annex 1)
|
Valuation Limits
|
True Value (GEL mln.)
|
True Value/Market Cap.
|
Low
|
15.0 |
2 |
High
|
22.5 |
3 |
BANK OF GEORGIA JSC
|
Sector:
|
Financial Services
|
GSE Ticker:
|
GEB
|
Summary Information:
· Bank of Georgia JSC is the country's
leading commercial bank;
· Last year the company reported about 6%
increase in annual sales to GEL 36.6 mln.;
· Net profit of the company has decreased
by about 7% in 2002 mainly due to higher administrative expenses;
· The Earning Per Share (EPS) in 2002 was
GEL 0.72;
· The company's assets grew by remarkable
30% over the year to reach GEL 176.7 mln.;
· The company's equity increased by 13%
over the last year and amounted to GEL 46.6 mln.;
· The company continues to pay dividends,
which amounted to GEL 2 mln.or GEL 0.20 per share.
|
Source: Galt
& Taggart
|
BANK OF GEORGIA JSC - Summary
|
Current Price (GEL)
|
1.55 |
Year High (GEL)
|
1.90 |
Year Low (GEL)
|
1.00 |
Market Capitalization (GEL mln.)
|
15.5 |
Shares Outstanding (mln.)
|
10.0 |
Free Float (%)
|
47.6 |
Free Float (GEL mln.)
|
7.4 |
Source: Galt
& Taggart
|
BANK OF GEORGIA JSC – Key Figures
(IAS)
|
Year Ending
December 31 |
2001
|
2002
|
Net Sales (GEL mln.)
|
34.4 |
36.6 |
Net Income (GEL mln.)
|
7.7 |
7.1 |
EPS (GEL)
|
0.78 |
0.72 |
Total Assets (GEL mln.)
|
135.6 |
176.7 |
Equity/Assets (%)
|
30.5 |
35.8 |
ROA (%)
|
5.7 |
4.0 |
ROE (%)
|
18.6 |
16.5 |
Book Value per Share (GEL)
|
4.13 |
5.14 |
P/E
|
2.02 |
2.15 |
P/BV
|
0.38 |
0.30 |
Sources: Bank
of Georgia, Galt & Taggart
|
BANK OF GEORGIA JSC – Valuation
(Refer to Annex 1)
|
Valuation Limits
|
True Value (GEL mln.)
|
True Value/Market Cap.
|
Low
|
50.8 |
3.3 |
High
|
68.6 |
4.4 |
4.3.1
Business Schools/Universities
European School of Management (ESM).
Data Sheet.
- European School
of Management ESM-Tbilisi
- 40, Vazha
Pshavela Ave. 1077, Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia
Tel.: (995-32) 39 68 64
Fax: (995-32) 37 55 16
e-mail: esmtbs@gol.ge
Internet: esm-tbilisi.ge
- Simon Kadagidze
- Mission of European School of Management in
Tbilisi (ESM-Tbilisi) is to create a new Georgian management elite -
professionally thinking and professionally acting under market economy
managers – providing high
quality management education using modern and innovative teaching
technologies and highly qualified faculty.
- LTD, Nonprofit
- Self financed
through students tuition fees
- 1992
- 20
- 87
- 4 -
Undergraduate Program, Graduate Program, Base Certificate Program,
Foundation Program
- 224+46+58+50
- Look the
attached sheets
- Undergraduate –
4 years
Graduate – 2 years
Base Certificate Program – 7 months
Foundation Program – 1 year
- Undergraduate -
224
Graduate - 46
Base Certificate Program - 58
Foundation Program - 50
- School leavers
and young professionals
- Undergraduate
Program - secondary school leavers with certificate
Graduate Program - young people with min bachelor
diplomas and min 2
years experience
Base certificate program - any person with high education
Foundation Program - secondary school leavers or students
in their last school year
- Undergraduate -
$ 2200/ year
Graduate - $ 3500
Base Certificate Program - $ 1200
Foundation Program - $ 1000
- Entrance
examinations, visiting schools with presentation, visiting educational
fairs, marketing campaign through an advertising agency
- Georgian with
good command of either English or German languages.
- Undergraduate -
Bachelor of Business Administration
(General Management)
Graduate - Master of Business
Administration
(General Management,
Finance, Marketing)
Base Certificate Program - Certificate
- $ 2000/year
The ESM Evening & Weekend MBA Program,
A Curriculum
2003-2005
4.3.2
Government Sponsored Training Programs
GEPA's In-Company Export Marketing
Programme.
|
The objective of GEPA's new programme is to increase the export capabilities
of Georgian companies. An integrated programme has been designed to assist
Georgian companies to systematically plan and prepare for export marketing.
The programme includes in-company export market development, training, the
organisation of inward and outward missions and a cost sharing grant scheme.
The in-company programme involves GEPA's Export Advisers working closely with
individual companies to establish an export marketing function. Participating
companies will be assisted and guided through the process of defining their
objectives and capabilities, the first step in the process. They will be
shown how to identify suitable markets and have access to all the information
sources in the Export Information Centre. They will then be in a position to
draw up a realistic export marketing strategy. GEPA staff will help them to
prepare for exporting and to implement their defined strategy.
In working through the programme, training needs will be identified and
addressed and some financial assistance may be available to assist companies
in financing eligible actions they need to take to prepare for exporting.
Participating companies will have in place a system for reviewing and
redefining their export marketing strategies on an on-going basis. This will
enable Georgian companies to anticipate and to be prepared for the ever
changing marketing environment, rather than just reacting to it.
During recent weeks GEPA staff has been visiting companies to explain the
programme in detail. Four companies have already begun the first stage of the
programme and another four will be added over the next few weeks. Companies
committed to developing an achievable export marketing strategy and willing
to devote time and effort to the process are invited to contact GEPA.
|
5. Other Donors’
Activities
Projects under implementation
|
Commitment
(US$ million)
|
Develp’t.
Objective
|
Impl.
Progress.
|
Approval
Date
|
Signing Date
|
Closing Date
|
Social Investment Fund |
25.0 |
S |
S |
12/11/97 |
06/05/98 |
12/31/03 |
Primary Health Care Dev. |
20.3 |
S |
S |
08/01/02 |
05/06/03 |
12/31/07 |
Education 1 (APL) |
25.9 |
S |
S |
03/20/01 |
12/03/01 |
06/30/05 |
Social Investment Fund 2 |
15.0 |
S |
S |
05/15/03 |
08/29/03 |
09/30/07 |
Roads Project |
40.0 |
S |
S |
05/25/00 |
01/31/01 |
12/31/04 |
Electricity Market Supp. |
27.4 |
S |
S |
05/03/01 |
09/26/02 |
12/31/05 |
Energy Transit Institution |
9.6 |
S |
S |
03/13/01 |
11/19/01 |
07/31/05 |
Municipal Development 2 |
19.4 |
S |
S |
08/01/02 |
02/19/03 |
06/30/06 |
SAC3 |
40.0 |
S |
S |
06/29/99 |
08/02/99 |
10/30/02 |
Structural Ref. Support |
16.5 |
S |
S |
06/29/99 |
09/22/99 |
03/31/04 |
Judicial Reform |
13.4 |
S |
S |
06/29/99 |
09/22/99 |
12/31/04 |
Enterprise
Rehabilitation |
15.0 |
S |
S |
12/17/98 |
09/08/99 |
12/31/04 |
Agriculture Development |
15.0 |
U |
U |
03/25/97 |
08/21/97 |
04/30/04 |
Forestry Development |
15.7 |
S |
S |
08/01/02 |
04/22/03 |
06/30/09 |
Protected Areas Dev
(GEF) |
8.7 |
|
S |
05/24/01 |
04/26/02 |
12/31/06 |
Integrated Coastal
Mngmt |
4.4 |
S |
S |
12/17/98 |
05/21/99 |
12/31/04 |
Irrig/Drainage Dev. |
27.0 |
S |
S |
06/28/01 |
02/20/02 |
04/30/07 |
Cultural Heritage |
4.5 |
S |
S |
02/13/98 |
05/18/98 |
12/31/03 |
Integrated Coastal
Mngmt (GEF) |
1.3 |
|
U |
12/17/98 |
05/21/99 |
12/31/04 |
Agriculture Research
Ext (GEF) |
2.5 |
S |
S |
05/11/00 |
02/05/01 |
12/31/05 |
Agriculture Research
Ext |
7.6 |
S |
S |
05/11/00 |
02/05/01 |
12/31/05 |
Total
|
354.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROJECT
|
AMOUNT
(millions)
|
|
Rehabilitation Credit |
US$
75.0 |
Closed June 1996. Fully disbursed. |
SAC |
US$
60.0 |
Closed December 1997. Fully disbursed. |
SATAC |
US$
4.8 |
Closed December 1998. Fully disbursed. |
Institution Building Credit |
US$
10.1 |
Closed June 1998. Fully disbursed |
SAC II |
US$
60.0 |
Closed December 1998. Fully disbursed
|
Transport |
US$
12.0 |
Closed June 30, 1999. Fully disbursed. |
SATAC II |
US$ 5.0 |
Closed December 31, 1999. Fully
disbursed. |
Municipal Infrastructure Rehabilitation |
US$ 18.0 |
Closed June 30, 2000. Fully disbursed. |
Power Rehabilitation |
US$ 52.3 |
Closed June 30, 2000. |
Oil Institution Building |
US$ 1.4 |
Closed December 31, 2000. Fully
disbursed. |
Energy Sector Adjustment Credit (ESAC) |
US$ 25.0 |
Closed March 1, 2002. Fully disbursed. |
Third Structural Adjustment Credit (SACIII) |
US$ 60.0
|
Closed October 30, 2002. Fully disbursed |
Total:
|
US$
383.6
|
|
REHABILITATION CREDIT
Implementing
Agency Temuri
Basilia, Chief Economic Advisor to the President of Georgia; State
Chancellery, 7 Ingorokva str.
(99532)989953,
(99532) 999757
Fax:
(99532)995797
Task
Manager Michaelle
Riboud, EC4C2
Phone: (202)
4738743
Fax:
(202)4773387
Project
Objective The
main objective is to support the government’s economic reform program aimed at
restoring macroeconomic stability and at promoting resumption of growth and
improvement in living standards. The other objectives are to:
1. Provide
budgetary support to maintain the level of basic public expenditures, in
particular for wages and the social safety net;
2. Provide
foreign exchange for the purchase of critical imports;
3. Improve
the functioning of the foreign exchange market;
4. Provide a
framework for assistance from other donor agencies.
Project
Description The
reform program to be supported by the credit comprises three sets of policies:
a) those
aimed at reducing and redefining the role of the public sector in the economy
b) those
theta foster the development and increase efficiency of markets;
c) those that
maintain a minimum social safety net through improved targeting of benefits.
Disbursement Fully
disbursed
INSTITUTION BUILDING
Project Objective Assist
the Georgian government in its efforts to move to a private market economy
through strengthening public institutions on three functional areas: (a)
financial sector, (b) economic management , (c) privatization and enterprise
reform
Project Description 1.
Financial Sector Reform (US$ 2.325 million)
(a)
Financial Sector Infrastructure:
Consulting
service and equipment:
-- to
introduce and implement Broadly Adapted Financial Statement (BASF), and
internationally acceptable accounting and auditing system;
-- to
conduct diagnostic studies in five state-owned banks and make recommendation
for steps to streamline the system;
-- review
existing payment system and make recommendations for steps to streamline the
system
2.
Economic management (US$ 5.660 million)
(b)
Economic Policy Formulation
Support will
be provided to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (now Chief Economic
Advisor to the President) to design a strategy for the restructuring and the
reform of the government’s economic management agencies, particularly the
Ministries of Finance and Economy, and to strengthen economic policy
formulation and analyses.
(c)
Statistical Services:
Consulting
services, training, and equipment to assist the Committee for Social and
Economic Information in
-- reviewing
the methodology used for generating and maintaining national accounts and
initiating steps to introduce the internationally acceptable System of National
Accounts (SNA);
-- designing
and conducting an improved household survey in the city Tbilisi
(d) Tax
Administration:
--
computerization of tax offices; IDA pilot project for the modernization and
computerization of the central State Tax Inspectorate (STI) and the Tbilisi
City Inspectorate;
-- training
of the STI staff.
(e) Treasure:
-- first
phase: a central treasury function will be established in the Ministry of
Finance and regional branch in Tbilisi;
-- second
phase: regional Treasuries will be established throughout of Georgia:
-- IDA will
finance computers for the establishment of the Treasury offices.
(g)
Strengthening of Customs Administration:
Support will
be provided to the Customs Committee in
(i) simplifying
and reforming the organization and procedures of customs operations: (ii)
modernizing customs management ;
(iii)
training the customs staff in the customs management and the computerization;
(iv)
computerizing customs clearance procedures, accounts, and statistics at Tbilisi
headquarters and at the Tbilisi airport as the first pilot site.
(h) Aid
Coordination:
-- Project
will finance long-term external advisor and equipment to assist and train the
staff of Aid Management Unit (AMU) in maintaining donor procedures,
coordinating country’s external aid priorities consistent with the national
development objectives, and communicating those with the external aid agencies.
-- Project
will finance experts to assist the government staff in analyzing Sectoral
information with the objective to design and develop project that will be
acceptable to the donor community.
(i)
Project Implementation: The project will finance:
-- an
external procurement consulting firm to assist the PIU with the preparation of
procurement an disbursement documents under this project, and to ensure that
all procurement under the project follow the World Bank’s procurement
guidelines
3. Privatization and Enterprise Reform (US$ 2.27 million)
(j)
Support for Privatization:
-- one
short-term senior level adviser to assist the Ministry of the state Property
Management and the Office of the Chief Economic adviser to the President in
reviewing the current privatization plan;
-- experts
and equipment to assist in:
a)
formulation the mass privatization program and the voucher scheme
b) the design
and implementation of a public information campaign to support the mass
privatization campaign;
c) provide
training aimed at strengthening the institutional capabilities of SPM;
d) review and
further development of a legislative framework for privatization.
Implementing Agency Alex Sikharulidze, Head of PIU, 42, Kazbegi ave.,
Phone:
(99532)950865
Fax:
(99532)950865
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CREDIT (SATAC)
Project Objective To
support the Government’s reform program to stabilize the economy and create the
conditions for a resumption of growth and an improvement in living standards.
Project
Description 1. Privatization and post-privatization (US$ 0.95 million)
(i) Continued support for the implementations of the privatization
program and on support for the establishment of the share registries.
(ii)
Introduction of cash auctions and an international tender program;
(iii)
Strengthening of institutional capacities, elaboration of standard procedures,
advise on structuring of transactions and bid evaluation, as well as legal
assistance and licensing of private share registries.
(iv)
Elaboration of operational guidelines, training of officials in securities
market and in the starting-up of pilot registries.
2.
Financial Sector ( US$ 0.78 million )
(i) Advisory
services on supervisory issues as well as the development of training programs.
(ii) Audits
if the three former state banks will be financed to dacilitate a realistic
assessment of the financial position of each bank.
3. Energy
sector reform ( US$ 0.86 million )
(i)
Assistance in creating the capacity to monitor and manage payment performance,
and in reviewing structural and tariff issues.
(ii)
Assistance in reviewing the scope of the regulatory authority and its tariff
policy functions.
4. Social
Protection ( US$ 0.56 million)
(i)
Assistance in the design of a program of social assistance which meets the
needs of poor families that do not qualify under any existing program;
(ii)
Facilitating the establishment of private pension schemes.
5.
Resource mobilization and public information
( US$ 1.43 million)
(i) A program
aimed at improving the revenue collection performance of the Customs
Department through training, revision of procedures and controls, and
anti-fraud measures;
(ii) A public
information/education program on economic reforms, including mass media
campaigns, round-tables/seminars on key issues, and the design of an education
program focusing on skills in high demand in market economics
Implementing Agency Zaal Japaridze, Head of PIU, 12 Kazbegi Ave.
Phone:
(99532) 950865
Ministry
of Trade and Foreign Economic Relations
42,
Kazbegi Ave.
Phone: (99532) 225186 / (99532) 389652
TRANSPORT
REHABILITATION
Project Objective 1.
To support policy reform in the transport sectoral and restructure its
institutions to operate in a market economy.
2. To repair
and maintain some of the most critical elements of the transport system.
Project Description (1)
Institution Building Component (US$ 4.9 million):
(i) advice
and support to teams preparing sector reforms;
(ii)
technical assistance for the formulation of technical and legal framework
necessary to the restructuring,
commercialization
and privatization of sector entities;
(iii)
managerial assistance for public and private transport enterprises;
(iv) a
training program to update transport technical staff of the private and public
sectors;
(v) project
management.
(2)
Investment Component ( US$ 13.2million )
(i) road
maintenance program, including selected equipment and spares for road
maintenance as well as emergency repairs and the necessary imported road
building materials;
(ii) a
railway sub-component, including bridge repairs and the required structural
steel, track materials (ties, rails and fastenings), spares for locomotives,
and communications and selected signaling equipment
Implementing Agency Gia Tsagareli, Head of PIU, 12 Kazbegi Ave.
Phone:
(99532) 986385
Fax:
(99532) 990461
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
CREDIT (SAC)
Project Objective: The main
objective is to consolidate stabilization, foster a strong and sustained growth
recovery and reduce poverty.
The reform program aims at:
(a)
maintaining a tight monetary
program supported by an improving fiscal position;
(b)
streamlining the
Government sector and improving efficiency of public spending;
(c)
inducing a rapid
adjustment of the productive sector to new market signals.
The other objectives
are;
(i)
provide budgetary
support to maintain the level of critical public expenditures;
(ii)
provide foreign
exchange for the purchase of critical imports;
(iii)
provide a framework for
financial assistance from other donor agencies.
Project
Description: 1. Maintaining a Tight Monetary
Policy:
- reduce inflation to 20-25 percent in 1996 and
strengthen the international position of NBG;
- increase the range of monetary instruments and enhance
the capacity of the NBG to achieve monetary objectives.
2. Improving
the Fiscal System:
- ensure sustainability of stabilization;
- increase tax revenue to 6.7 percent of GDP in 1996;
- reach a revenue to expenditure ration of 70 percent in
1996 and maintain budget deficit at 3-4 percent of GDP in 1996.
3.
Streamlining of the Government Sector and Improving the Efficiency of Public
Spending:
- to maintain critical public function within the
framework of a tight expenditure program (expenditure maintained at about 13
percent of GDP in 1996);
- reforming government pay and employment;
- reforming the provision and financing of social
services reforming social insurance and social protection;
- eliminating energy subsidies;
4. Fostering
Adjustment of the Productive Sector:
- accelerating privatization;
- restructuring the financial sector;
- fostering export growth.
Disbursement: US$ 29.88 million
The
disbursement of the loan is linked to agreed targets specified for each tranche
release – to be met by the Georgian Government in implementing its structural
reform program.
SECOND STRUCRUTAL ADJUSTMENT
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CREDIT (SATAC II)
Project Description: The Government’s structural reform program outline in the Letter of
development Policy was presented with the Second Adjustment Credit (SACII), $60
million (which closed in December 1998). To facilitate the timely
implementation of structural reforms, the Government requested a program of
technical assistance to support the design and implementation of reform
measures in the key areas. The institutional capacity of the Government to
implement structural reform measures has been successfully strengthened under
the Institutional Building Credit (IBC) and the Structural Adjustment Technical
Assistance Credit (SATAC). Lessons learned from these two technical assistance
projects were incorporated in the design of SATAC II.
The Core objective of SATAC II is to enhance the capacity of the
Georgian Government to implement the structural reform program supported by SAC
II.
The technical assistance is divided into seven broad categories:
·
judicial reform and anti-corruption initiative;
·
financial sector;
·
energy sector reforms;
·
social protection
·
health
·
resource mobilization
·
public information
The World Bank and IMF Partnership in Georgia’s Development Strategy
1.
The IMF has taken the lead in assisting Georgia
in enhancing macroeconomic stability. In this regard, the Fund has encouraged
the authorities to pursue a prudent fiscal policy, including by increasing tax
revenues and reducing domestic expenditure arrears. The IMF Board approved a
new three-year program under the Fund’s Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF)
in January 2001. The first and the second reviews under the PRGF were
completed in October 2001 and July 2002, respectively. Implementation of the
2002 macroeconomic program was broadly on track. Quantitative criteria and
indicative targets were met, except for those on domestic arrears, fuel and
excise tax collection and reserve money. At 2
percent of GDP, the fiscal deficit was slightly higher than programmed because
of shortfalls in external financing, and revenue collection improved only slightly
from 14.3 percent of GDP to 14.4 percent over the period. An IMF mission which
visited Georgia in July 2003 to discuss completion of the postponed third
review found that the fiscal pressures that emerged in early 2003 had
continued, with tax revenue falling short of budget targets, and an
accumulation of substantial new budget arrears. The IMF thus saw the need inter
alia to introduce some tax reform measures, adjust electricity tariffs and
revise the 2003 budget to close the fiscal gap. The authorities achieved the
first two but were unable to secure parliamentary approval of a revised
budget. The current PRGF will expire in the next several months and the IMF
will soon be initiating discussions to assess prospects for a possible new
three-year program to support Georgia’s EDPRP.
2.
The World Bank has taken the lead in the policy
dialogue on structural issues, focusing on: (i) strengthening public
expenditure management; (ii) deepening and diversifying sources of growth,
(iii) protecting the environment; and (iv) reducing poverty. The table on page
53 summarizes the division of responsibility between the two institutions. In
a number of areas – for example the social sectors, rural development,
environment, and infrastructure – the Bank takes the lead in the dialogue and
there is no cross conditionality with the IMF-supported program. The Bank is
also leading the dialogue on private sector reform, and Bank analysis serves as
inputs into the Fund program. In other areas – energy, the financial sector,
public expenditure management, and revenue and customs – both institutions work
together. Finally, in areas like monetary policy the IMF takes the lead with
little Bank involvement.
Areas in which the World Bank leads and there is no direct IMF involvement
3.
Areas in which the Bank leads and there is no
direct IMF involvement include the social sectors, infrastructure and
environment.
·
In the social sectors the Bank conducts
annual updates of Georgia’s Poverty Assessment based on household data collected
on a quarterly basis. The Bank’s focus has been to improve the budget
execution of expenditures for health, education and poverty benefits and to
raise the efficiency in the use of scarce public resources. Through the Social
Investment Fund Credits IDA is focusing in particular on areas with high
poverty levels to provide basic infrastructure to the poorest communities. A
recently approved Self-reliance Fund Grant will help authorities address the
complex issues related to internally displaced people. IDA is also supporting
a dialogue with the Government on social protection reform that may lead to an
IDA-supported project.
·
In education the Education Adaptable
Program Credit aims at improving the learning outcomes of primary and
secondary students, through curriculum reform, development of an examination
system, training of teachers, provision of learning materials, and development
of capacity to make better use of Georgia’s physical, financial and human resources.
While the investment needs of school buildings are substantially higher than is
currently affordable for Georgia, the Social Investment Fund projects continue
to assist in financing urgent repairs to school facilities in many
communities.
·
In health IDA Credits to support the
Government in improving the health care financing system, exploring
risk-pooling options, introducing a new system of primary health care and
improving the focus of services funded through public funds on the poor and on
priority public health interventions. In addition hospital restructuring has
been supported by SAC 3 and the Structural Reform Support Credit.
·
In infrastructure support is being
provided through the Municipal Development and Decentralization Credit and the
Social Investment Fund Credit. These projects are providing financing at the
community level for critical infrastructure needs, primarily for school and
health facilities heating and repair, small hydropower schemes to provide
electricity, drinking water and sanitation rehabilitation, as well as
transportation infrastructure rehabilitation.
·
In rural development IDA credits have
supported the development of private sector farming and agro-processing
improvements, agricultural credit, irrigation and drainage, and agriculture
research and extension. IDA has also been supporting
the creation of local institutions such as rural credit unions and water users
associations through its Credits.
Areas in which the World Bank leads and its analysis serves as input
into the IMF program
4.
The Bank has been leading the dialogue on
structural reforms through SAC 3, approved by the Bank’s Board of Executive
Directors in June, 1999, and closed in October, 2002. Despite considerable
delays, the core conditions of SAC 3 were met, but their impact was reduced by
poor governance. Institution building and technical assistance has been
supported through the Structural Reform Support Credit, also approved by the
Bank’s Board of Executive Directors on June 29, 1999. The Bank also leads in
the areas of:
·
Private sector development. SAC 3 supported improvements in the environment for private
sector development, focusing on: (i) simpler licensing regulations; (ii) more
transparent government procurement; (iii) reduced cost of entry for businesses;
and (iv) privatization of state-owned commercial assets. IDA has also been
supporting private sector participation in other areas such as energy,
telecommunications, urban services and agriculture. The IMF has worked with
the authorities to initiate audits of the 2002 accounts of three major state
owned enterprises.
·
Energy. The
energy system is in poor condition, with unreliable supply, massive non-payment
and mounting debts. IDA has been working with other donors, including the IMF,
to encourage more private management and ownership, and to implement a series
of short-term action plans to improve the overall functioning of the sector.
The IMF has also been focusing on improved payments for electricity.
·
Public Sector Management. The Bank is supporting the development of a civil service reform
program, while the Fund is providing technical assistance in support of tax and
customs administration reform.
Areas of shared responsibility of the World Bank
and IMF
5.
The Bank and the Fund have been working jointly
in the following main areas (supported by the Bank’s SAC 3 and Structural
Reform Support Credit, several investment operations and the Fund’s PRGF):
·
Poverty Reduction Strategy. Both institutions
have been working closely with the Government to provide support to the
development of the PRSP, through seminars and workshops, direct staff input,
and a multi-donor Trust Fund to support the work of the PRSP secretariat..
·
Budget Planning and Execution. The annual
process-based Public Expenditure Reviews will provide the underpinnings for
systemic changes in expenditure management, with the immediate aim being
improved budget formulation in 2004. The IMF is focusing on Treasury reform
within the Ministry of Finance.
·
Financial Sector Reforms. The joint Financial
Sector Assessment Program has supported: (i) strengthened banking and
non-banking supervision; (ii) introduction of international accounting
standards; (iii) and consolidation of banks through higher capital requirement
ratios; and (iv) anti money-laundering legislation. The IMF has focused in
particular on banking supervision.
·
Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA). Given
Georgia’s heavy external debt burden, the Bank and the Fund conduct joint Debt
Sustainability Analysis on a regular basis.
Areas in which the IMF leads and its analysis serves
as input into the World Bank program
·
Fiscal Framework. The IMF’s focus on prudent
fiscal policy has served as an important framework for IDA’s work on public
expenditure management.
Areas in which the IMF leads and there is no direct World Bank
involvement
·
Monetary Framework. The IMF closely collaborates
with the NBG in the design and implementation of a monetary program that aims
at remonetization of the economy, while keeping inflation low and the exchange
rate of the Lari stable
·
Economic Statistics. IMF technical assistance
has been conducive to improvements in national accounts, price, monetary and
government financial statistics.
Activities
(as identified in the EDPRP)
|
Responsible Agencies
|
Focus of Bank
Actions
|
Expected Results FY04-06
|
Bank Group Program
|
Part-ners
|
WB Performance
Indicators for End FY06
|
Improvement of Governance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Development of a comprehensive,
long-term concept and action plan of executive government reforms, and of a
program to improve structure and number of employees in organizations under
budgetary financing |
State Chancellery, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of
Finance
relevant executive government bodies
|
Assistance to the State Chancellery in carrying out a
functional analysis of the central government agencies and assessment of
budgetary employment, remuneration, and training policy; on the basis of
the above studies, develop recommendations |
Widely owned program to improve functioning of government
administration and agencies; remuneration and retrenchment policy for core
civil service introduced, and plans for civil service training developed |
Public Sector Management Project |
DFID, USAID, UNDP |
Initiation of reform and restructuring of civil service |
·
Inventory of normative
acts defining the competence of government agencies to avoid duplication of
local government functions |
State Chancellery of Georgia, Ministry of Justice |
Review of the existing legal framework |
Initiation of legislative change and amendments |
Public Sector Management Project; Public Expenditure
Reviews |
DFID
EU USAID UNDP
|
Duplications and overlap among the central state agencies
reduced, mandates more clearly defined |
·
Distinction of municipal
property from central government and private property |
State Chancellery, Ministry of Economy, Industry and
Trade, Agency of State
Property Management, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of
Finance
|
Advice on financing mechanism for transfer of road and
transport properties and legal mechanisms for owning and managing very low
volume farm access roads |
Revised functional/administration classification of
roads; sound allocation formula for dividing Road Fund revenues between
road owners |
Secondary Roads Project; Trade and Transport Facilitation
Project; Rural Infrastructure Study |
Kuwait Fund for Economic Development |
New road classification; new procedures for managing the
road fund, including allocation of funds between road owners |
Macroeconomic Stability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Preparation of indicative
plans of development for the economy for 2004 and 2005 |
Ministry of Economy, Industry and Trade |
Improvement of linkage between policy, resource
constraints and budgets |
Develop a more realistic medium-term budget framework |
Public Expenditure Reviews, PRSC in High Case |
IMF
DFID
|
Budget execution closer to planned |
·
Initiate the process to
convert a portion of government debt liabilities into long-term debt
instruments |
National Bank |
Assistance
to the MoF develop long-term debt instruments, e.g. government bond market |
MoF starts to use medium to long-term
government bonds to replace the rolling of short-term debt instruments |
Financial
Sector Advisory Program |
IMF |
1-10
year government bond market in place |
·
Improvement of the management
of international reserves of the NBG |
National Bank |
Advise to National Bank on management of reserves |
Increased import coverage |
Financial Sector Advisory Program |
IMF |
Gross foreign reserves to reach over 2 months of imports |
·
Completion of tax and customs
administration reform |
Ministry of Finance, State Tax and Customs Departments |
Development of a business-friendly tax environment |
Increased collection of excise taxes and improved VAT administration |
Public Expenditure Reviews, Business Environment
Study, PRSC in High Case |
IMF USAID
EU |
Collection of excise taxes to reach over 2 percent of GDP |
·
Implementation of treasury
reform, centralization of treasury service; development and introduction of
commitment accounting and control system; development and introduction of
expenditure control system |
Ministry of Finance |
Assistance
to the MOF to improve its cash and debt management capacity and skills |
Consolidation of effective control system, and adoption
of a single treasury account |
CPAR Updates, Public Expenditure Reviews, PRSC in High
Case |
IMF |
Improved
cash management and debt management capacity |
·
Improve government procurement
system and expand scope of its coverage |
State Procurement Department, Ministry of Economy,
Industry and Trade |
Establishment of a transparent state procurement system;
decentralization of State procurement functions to line agencies |
Greater efficiency and competition within the system; reduced
delays and corruption in procurement process |
CPAR, Public Expenditure Reviews, PRSC, project lending
(e.g. Secondary Roads and Trade and Transport Facilitation) |
|
Recommendations of Country Portfolio Assessment Report
implemented
|
·
Gradual increase of the
share of targeted programs in the state budget |
Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economy, Industry and
Trade |
Develop program-based budgeting |
Improve consistency between medium-term indicative plan
and the budget |
Public Expenditure Reviews, Public Sector Management
Credit, PRSC in High Case |
DFID |
Public Expenditure Reviews assessment of better targeting
of programs in the budget |
·
Inventory of budgetary
arrears |
Ministry of Finance |
Establish accurate estimates of past government liabilities |
Better information on, and reduction in, arrears |
CFAA Updates, Public Expenditure Reviews |
IMF |
Reduced arrears |
·
Increase the number of participants
in treasury bill market and improve bidding mechanisms to increase maturity
and reduce the discount rate through market |
Ministry of Finance, National Bank, National Commission
of Securities |
More competitive and efficient T-bill market |
Short term: more participants for competitive bidding,
and for non-competitive quota; medium term: cash management, coordination
between MOF & NBG on T-bills/open market operations; long term:
independent debt management office |
Financial Sector Advisory Program, PRSC in High Case |
USAID
FIRST
|
Lower T-bill yield |
·
Develop legislation promoting
the activities of investment funds in order to introduce best corporate
management practice in enterprises and develop stock market |
Ministry of Finance, National Commission of Securities |
Help build legal environment for investment funds;
provide information/advice |
Establishment of legal environment for investment funds |
Financial
Sector Advisory Program |
|
Regulation of investment funds in place; NCS has capacity
to supervise those funds |
·
Prepare and adopt bill “on
Personification and Registration of Insurance Contributions to Social
Insurance System” required for regularizing first (distributive) pillar of
pension system and development of pensioners’ personified registration system |
Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Protection |
Support to Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Protection
on legal reforms and their implementation |
Law adopted successfully |
Social Protection Reform Project |
|
Regularization of 1st pillar of pension system; better
links between pensions and contributions |
·
For private pension funds,
adopt statutory normative acts in accordance with the laws “on Non-Government
Pension Funds” and “on Securities Market” |
National Securities Commission, Ministry of Labor,
Health and Social Protection |
Support to National Securities Commission and Ministry
of Labor, Health and Social Protection on legal reforms and their implementation |
Normative acts developed and adopted |
Social Protection Reform Project |
|
Improved regulatory environment in the area of private
pensions |
·
Prepare amendments to the
Tax Code and investment rules of pension assets to promote the development of
non-banking financial sector, including nongovernmental voluntary insurance
system |
Ministry of Finance, State Service of Insurance Supervision,
National Commission of Securities |
Support to relevant agencies on amendments to tax code
and investment rules |
Improved functioning of non-banking financial sector,
including insurance companies/private pension funds |
Social Protection Reform Project |
|
Greater and more effective role for non-banking financial
sector, including insurance companies and private pension funds |
Structural Reforms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Assess magnitude and share
smuggled goods and those manufactured in informal sector of the economy by
various commodity groups |
Ministry of Economy, Industry and Trade; State
Department of Statistics |
Support for initiatives to reduce smuggling and the
shadow economy |
Reduction in smuggling and in the shadow economy |
Trade Facilitation Project; Private Sector Development
Project; Public Sector Reform
Project; PRSC in High Case |
USAID |
Increase in tax revenues, including increase in revenues
from petroleum products and cigarettes to over 2.5% of GDP |
·
Develop proposals to
encourage investment |
Ministry of Economy, Industry and Trade; Ministry of Finance;
Ministry of Justice |
Intensified
dialogue with Government on reform of the banking system as a means of
improving the investment climate |
Increase
in banks’ capitalization; better corporate governance principles and
internal control systems; expansion of banking networks; real time banking
settlement; anti-money-laundering legislation; deposit insurance introduced |
Private Sector Development Project; Financial Sector Advisory
Program; Business Environment Study |
USAID
IMF
FIRST
|
Minimum capital raised to ˆ3.5m; improved confidence in
banking system; better access to finance; anti money laundering regulations
in compliance with FATF requirements |
·
Implement export promotion
measures |
Ministry of Economy, Industry and Trade; Ministry of
Finance |
Support for removal of institutional (governance)
obstacles to fulfilling Georgia’s Export Potential |
Progress in implementing recommendations of Trade
Study/Workshop |
Trade and Transport Facilitation Project; Private Sector
Development Project; Business Environment Study; Rural Development Project |
USAID |
Improved perception of environment for exporters in
business surveys |
Human Capital Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvement of Health
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Revise government commitments
in healthcare sector to ensure full financing |
Ministry of Labor, Healthcare and Social Protection;
Ministry of finance |
Assist government to define health financing strategy focusing
on improvements in mobilization, allocation and management of public and
private resources, help build government capacity in evidence based
policy-making, planning, monitoring and evaluation, as well as regulation |
Definition of basic benefit package, financing methodology
and co-payments, as well as recurrent costs; improved resource mobilization
and allocation, including introduction of incentive-compatible provider
payment systems |
Health Sector Note, JSDF Grant on community health
insurance |
JSDF SIDA
DFID WHO
|
Definition of basic benefit package, financing
methodology, co-payments, and recurrent costs; better resource mobilization
and allocation, including introduction of incentive-compatible provider
payment systems |
Improvement of Education
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Develop programs for basic
education |
Ministry of Education, Ministry of Culture |
Improving quality of education and access of the poor |
Stakeholders actively engaged in improving education
quality and outcomes |
Education Project |
SOROS |
97 percent enrollment in basic education for the poorest
quintile; 60% of consolidated education expenditures continue to be
allocated to primary/secondary education |
Improvement of Social Risks
Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Definition of nature and
periodicity of government commitments in the social sector to ensure full
financing |
Ministry of Labor, Healthcare and Social Protection;
State Social Security Fund; Ministry of Finance |
Timely execution of Government obligations in the social
sectors; fiscal affordability and sustainability |
No-arrears in social transfers, increased poverty
alleviation impact |
Public Expenditure Reviews, PRSC in High Case |
|
No new arrears; poverty incidence decreased by 6
percentage points |
·
Enforce package of draft
bills on compulsory social insurance |
Ministry of Labor, Healthcare and Social Protection,
State Social Security Fund |
Support to implementation of social insurance system |
Better performance of the pension system |
Social Protection Reform Project |
|
No pension arrears; financing of social insurance/assistance
benefits separated |
·
Phased increase of
pensions |
Ministry of Labor, Healthcare and Social Protection,
State Social Security Fund |
Dialogue on pension policies |
Increase in pensions |
Public Expenditure Reviews; Social Protection Reform
Project |
|
Average real pension increased by 20%; extreme poverty
among elderly reduced |
·
Fiscal sustainability of
pension system based on compulsory social insurance |
Ministry of Labor, Healthcare and Social Protection,
State Social Security Fund |
Dialogue on pension policies |
Satisfactory performance of the pension system |
Public Expenditure Reviews; Social Protection Reform
Project |
|
Improved fiscal sustainability of pension system |
Development of Priority Branches of the
Economy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Reorganize electricity
wholesale market to resume the functions of financial and technical operator |
Ministry of Fuel and Energy |
Support for direct contracts between
generators and large end consumers, subject to transparent terms and
implementation |
Direct contracts between generators and
large end consumers |
EMSP |
EBRD
KfW
USAID
|
Electricity market successfully
reorganized |
·
Amend tariff policy in
line with model of wholesale market and consider liberalization of prices |
Ministry of Fuel and Energy; Energy Regulatory Commission;
Ministry of Economy |
Tariff policy; adequate appropriations
to energy in state budgets |
Lower commercial losses; state budgets
fully cover energy costs; higher collections by state energy companies in
distribution, transmission; improved financial viability |
EMSP |
EBRD
IMF
KfW
USAID
|
Cash payment collections at the
wholesale electricity market above 65%; dissemination to public of detailed
sector performance indicators |
·
Approve strategy to manage
energy sector debts |
Ministry of Fuel and Energy, Ministry of Finance |
Establishment of a professional Debt Restructuring
Agency for the power sector |
Legacy debt no longer a threat to the financial
viability of the power sector |
EMSP |
EBRD
IMF
KfW
USAID
|
Debt Restructuring
Agency led by international experts in full operation; legacy debt issue
resolved |
·
Transfer energy sector companies,
including National Distribution Company, under management contract in
accordance with existing strategy |
Ministry of Fuel and Energy |
Georgian Unified Distribution Company (GUDC) under
long-term management contract |
GUDC under long-term management contract |
EMSP |
EBRD
KfW
USAID
|
GUDC under long-term management
contract; other management contracts fully operational |
·
Improve transport
regulatory administration |
Ministry of Transport and Communication |
MOTC restructuring |
Improved functioning of restructured MOTC |
Secondary Roads Project; Transport Facilitation Project |
|
SDRG restructured and road financing arranged to provide
stable source for road funding to maintain and improve roads |
·
Technical monitoring of
emergency conditions, restore status of premises and constructions of
strategic importance and special complexity of the energy, transportation,
communication and construction infrastructure as well as those damaged from
earthquakes |
Ministry of Economy, Industry and Trade, Ministry of
Fuel-Energy, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, State Department
of Highways |
Development of road data bank for SDRG to take prompt,
cost-effective action in emergencies |
The data bank is used to prioritize annual road program |
Secondary Roads Project; Transport Facilitation Project |
|
Road data bank in use and SDRG expanded to cover local
rural roads |
·
Improve implementation of
road construction plan, identify strategic projects and sources of financing |
State Department of Highways |
Road construction plan, equipping SDRG with tools to
develop and manage the plan |
5 year rolling plan a standard procedure in SDRG |
Secondary Roads Project; Transport Facilitation Project |
EU, Kuwait Development Fund |
Performance indicators to be developed in Secondary Roads
project |
·
Form information network
covering the entire country |
State
Department of Information |
Improving rural access to telecommunications services |
Better and more affordable access by the rural population
to telecommunications |
Rural Telecommunications Project |
|
Higher proportion of the rural population having affordable
access to telecommunications |
Tourism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Prepare special program to
attract additional funding from international donor organizations to develop
tourism |
State
Department of Tourism and Resorts |
Development of community-based tourism |
Realistic development strategy for tourism -- especially
community-based tourism -- that promotes broad-based local development,
reduces administrative barriers to tourism, and supports preservation |
Community-based tourism |
|
Realistic development strategy for community-based
tourism, including reduced administrative barriers and more focus on
preservation |
Agriculture
and Food
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Establish water consumer
associations in rural areas |
Ministry of Agriculture, Melioration System Management
Department |
Support to establishing new, and strengthening existing,
water users associations to manage irrigation facilities |
More and better functioning water user associations |
Irrigation and Drainage Rehabilitation Project |
EU
TACIS
|
Legal framework for WUAs established; number of water
user associations registered increased |
·
Develop unified geographic
computer system of land cadastre and registration |
Ministry of Agriculture and Food, State Department of
Land Management |
Support to strengthening capacity of State Department of
Land Management to carry out land registration based on cadastre survey |
Increased capacity of State Department of Land Management |
Agriculture Development Project |
IFAD, USAID KfW |
Eleven land registration centers established; satellite
imagery used for titling in mountainous regions |
·
Establish private
veterinary services |
Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Veterinary Department |
Dialogue with Government on Veterinary reforms |
Law to establish private veterinarians passed |
ARET |
USAID |
Government starts veterinary reform process |
·
Structural reorganization
of plants protection services |
Ministry of Agriculture and Food,
Plant Protection Service |
Discussion with MAF on reform of plant protection
services |
Follow-up to merging of three agencies into a single
plant protection agency |
ADP |
USAID |
Reduced illegal trade of agro-chemicals; relevant laws
passed |
SECTOR
|
LEAD NATIONAL AGENCY
|
PARTNERS
|
Agriculture |
Ministry
of Agriculture and Food |
IFAD,
FAO, DFID, UNDP, KFW |
Culture |
Ministry
of Culture
Fund
for Cultural Heritage Protection
|
EU |
Education |
Ministry
of Education |
SOROS |
Energy |
Ministry
of Fuel and Energy
Georgian
National Energy Regulatory Commission
|
USAID,
KFW, EBRD |
Financial
Sector |
Ministry
of Finance and Tax Revenues
National Bank of Georgia
National
Securities Commission
Foreign
Investment Advisory Council
|
IMF |
Forestry |
State
Department of Forestry |
FAO,
WWF, CIDA |
Governance |
State
Chancellery, Anti-corruption Policy Coordination Council |
Netherlands,
IMF, DFID, USAID, UNDP, |
Health |
Ministry
of Labor, Health and Social Affairs |
SIDA,
DFID, WHO |
Judicial |
Ministry
of Justice
Supreme
Court
ALPE
(Association of Legal Public Education)
|
EU,
USAID, SOROS, ABA, DOJ |
Municipal
Development and Decentralization |
Georgian
Municipal Development Fund (MDF) |
|
Poverty
Reduction |
Secretariat
of Governmental Commission on PREGP (Poverty reduction and Economic Growth
Program) |
IMF,
UNDP, DFID, USAID |
Private
Sector |
Ministry
of Economy, Industry and Trade |
USAID,
EBRD, BP |
Protected
Areas |
State
Department of Protected Territories, Preserves and Hunting Grounds |
UNDP |
Roads |
Ministry
of Transport, Telecommunications and Post
State
Department of Roads
|
Kuwait Fund for
Economic Development
|
Social
Infrastructure |
Georgian
Social Investment Fund (GSIF) |
KFW |
Transport
and Communications |
Ministry
of Transport, Telecommunications and Post
National
Commission of Telecommunications and Transport
|
|
USAID
assistance in the economic growth area focuses on strengthening agriculture
sector, assisting the NBG to improve its supervision, inspection, and
enforcement capacity, and furthering land market reform. The Georgian
Enterprise Growth Initiative (GEGI) is a major new private sector development
activity to be implemented in close coordination with the CAS programs. USAID
has been actively involved in the energy and environmental sectors providing TA
to regulatory bodies, supporting privatization of the energy sector and
improvement of the international investment climate, assisting in elaboration
of environmentally sound laws in the energy sector as well as policies in the
sector oriented towards energy efficiency, conservation and water management.
Through democracy and governance oriented projects USAID supports increased
awareness of legal rights, judicial and BAR reform initiatives, strengthening
local governments, building professionalism of independent mass media as well
as capacity of civil society and NGOs. USAID initiatives in the social sectors
include programs in the regions to support income generation and economic
self-reliance activities among internally displaced persons, crisis assistance
to the most vulnerable, health care partnership programs and reproductive
health programs which promote improved maternal and perinatal services, safe
motherhood, family planning, health information systems, and STI/HIV awareness
and prevention.
EBRD
main objective in Georgia is to expand private sector development activities in
the country. During years 2002 and 2003 it has been engaged in the active
political dialogue with the Government to support the substantial reduction of
administrative barriers to investments, representation on the board of
companies and banks, support of the initiatives of local business associations.
EBRD aims at further strengthening of the Georgian banking sector through
ongoing support to the regulator, management training, and further consolidation.
EBRD’s interventions include financing to business start-ups and existing
micro, small and medium-sized enterprises as well as selectively supporting
critical investments in infrastructure with specific focus on those projects
that promote the commercialization of infrastructure, particularly of the
energy sector.
EU’s
Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) provides for cooperation in a wide
range of areas including Food Security Program (in amount of ˆ 25 million for
the period 2002-2003), rehabilitation in conflict zones (Engury Power Plan in
Abkhazia), macro-financial assistance (establishment of an agricultural credit
institutions, reforms in accountancy and audit, assistance to the insurance
sector and securities market regulation), support to trade liberalization,
customs, and development of transport infrastructure networks, advice on
economic legislation and country legislature harmonization with the EU
standards, investments in primary health care reconstruction program and
development of the Georgian National Health Program and training of medical and
administrative personnel as well as provision of the technical assistance for
the development of the model of Regional Health financing. TACIS is the main
financial instrument supporting the implementation of the PCA.
GTZ,
working on behalf of German Government, provides support in the health sector
primarily focusing on structural improvements and training for medical
technicians, promotes vocational training sector to improve commercial and
agricultural training and upgrading, implements projects to privatize
agriculture and build up effective land- and debt-management systems, promotes
export and investment, and has been assisting in judicial and legal training as
well as practical application of civil law in Georgia. German assistance is
also channelled through KfW supporting credit line to agriculture sector
enterprises, participating with an equity stake in Procredit Bank, is
conducting cadastral works almost all over the country, and contributing to
social infrastructure in the districts bordering Borjomi-Kharagauli National
Park as well as supporting the Government to rehabilitate schools and health
facilities damaged during the recent earthquake.
Bilateral assistance also comes from Canada
(CIDA) mostly through the regional projects supporting trade policy capacity,
expanding the micro credit programs, promoting NGO capacity development program
that supports the principles of good governance, strengthening health reform
through the appropriate application of health information technology and
information management strategies, and contributing drought victims relief
operations.
DFID
has recently approved a new Primary Health Care (PHC) Development project
through which technical assistance will be provided to the Government in the
areas of human resource development for the PHC system, health care financing,
health management information systems, capacity building for the health policy
development. DFID has been supporting the SDS in the multi-sector household and
labor market surveys. The ongoing program also has a component aiming at development
of good governance and civil society in two regions of Georgia as well as
conflict reduction and confidence-building component.
The Netherlands has provided
support for a wide range of activities, focusing on good governance, human
rights and peace building, as well as substantial budget support in conjunction
with SAC III. Dutch support in the three focus areas will continue, including
for . election preparation, prevention of trafficking in human beings,
confidence building measures in Abkhazia and support for NGOs involved in
poverty alleviation and human rights
In the agriculture sector IFAD
supports rural development program for mountainous and highland areas and
credit-union development and rural credit activities for small farmers, while
FAO provides financial support to hazelnut sector rehabilitation project.
UNDP in
Georgia focuses its program activities in three areas: (a) democratic
governance; (b) poverty reduction; and (c) environmental protection, as
outlined in the second Country Cooperation Framework for Georgia (2001-2005).
In the sphere of Governance, major ongoing initiatives include support to
Foreign Investment Advisory Council, strengthening the Anti-corruption
Promotion Group, and assistance to the Constitutional Court and Public
Defender’s Office. UNDP has been active in capacity building of the Georgian
International Oil Corporation and of the National Security Policy Management.
UNDP is contributing to land market development through creation of a
computerized program of registration. Technical and financial inputs have been
provided to strengthen the capacity of Georgian institutions responsible for
national statistics, notably the State Department of Statistics. Environmental
challenges are being addressed through the projects supporting recovery,
conversation and sustainable use of Georgia’s agro-biodiversity, removal of
barriers to small hydro power sector development, and capacity building of the
Ministry of Environment.
UNICEF
priorities in Georgia include: education, integrated childhood development,
immunization, fighting HIV/AIDS, and protecting children from violence,
exploitation, abuse and discrimination. It has been assisting the Government in
national training of health workers and professionals and in providing
universal access to basic health services for women and children. UNICEF has
been helping the Government in promoting the implementation of the Convention
on the Rights of the Child. Support also includes ensuring inclusive education
for children with disabilities and providing psychosocial support to children
in need of special protection as well as introducing alternative,
non-institutional methods of childcare. Child de-institutionalization has been
also supported by SIDA through provision of technical assistance during social
protection reform project preparation and implementation phases.
[1]
Presidential Decree 678 calls for elaboration of a new law on privatization of
agricultural land and completion of the national land cadastre by the year
2005. Apparently a draft of such a law is already circulated in the Parliament.
[2]
Amended September 3, 1997; September 18, 1997; December 12, 1997; February 5,
1998; May 1, 1998; May 13, 1998; May 29, 1998; June 26, 1998; October 13, 1998;
October 30, 1998; December 24, 1998; April 2, 1999; April 16, 1999; June 8,
1999; June 9, 1999; June 25, 1999; July 23, 1999; September 9, 1999; December
9, 1999; December 24, 1999; December 28, 1999; March 24, 2000; June 28, 2000;
July 13, 2000; September 27, 2000; September 28, 2000; October 11, 2000;
October 13, 2000; November 10, 2000; November 24, 2000; December 5, 2000;
December 13, 2000; December 29, 2000; March 16, 2001; April 27, 2001; June 8,
2001.
[3]
Resident physical persons: who received income that was not taxed at the source
of payment in Georgia; who have funds in accounts in foreign banks; or whose
expenditures during the tax year exceed 25,000 GEL. As well as, non-resident
physical persons with income from a Georgian source that is not taxed at the
source of payment.
[4]
In hindsight, the VAT threshold should have been much higher when the VAT was
adopted.
[5]
For example, it would help screen shell companies created for the very purpose
to evade tax payments.
[6]
FIAS, Georgia: Study of administrative barriers to investment, December 2001.
[7]
This also applies to foreign investors, as numerous critical articles on
taxation in Georgia published by the American Chamber of Commerce newspaper
demonstrate.
[8] O: Observed.
[9] LO: Largely Observed.
[10] MNO: Materially Non-Observed.
[11] NO: Non-Observed.
[12] NA: Not Applicable.
[13] Although a draft law on Investment Funds has been prepared with
assistance from USAID (IOSCO, 2001)
[14] C: Compliant.
[15] PC: Partially Compliant.
[16] MNC: Materially Non-Compliant.
[17] NC: Non-Compliant.
[18] NA: Not Applicable.
[21] Because Georgia is a member of the 1961 Hague Convention, on the
abolition of legalization requirements of documents issued in foreign
countries, only documents originating from countries not signatories to the
Hague Convention require legalization by the consular offices.
[22] Article 4.3
[23] No. 2132-11s
|